Volume 10 · Number 3 · Pages 405–411
Amusement, Delight, and Whimsy: Humor Has Its Reasons that Reason Cannot Ignore

Edith K. Ackermann

Download the full text in
PDF (662 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: The idea for this article sprang from a desire to revive a conversation with the late Ernst von Glasersfeld on the heuristic function - and epistemological status - of forms of ideations that resist linguistic or empirical scrutiny. A close look into the uses of humor seemed a thread worth pursuing, albeit tenuous, to further explore some of the controversies surrounding the evocative power of the imaginal and other oblique forms of knowing characteristic of creative individuals. Problem: People generally respond to humor, i.e., they are inclined to smile at things they find funny. People like to crack jokes, make puns, and, starting at age two, human infants engage in pretense or fantasy play. Research on creativity, on the other hand, has mostly scorned the trickster within. Cognitivists in particular are quick to relegate wit, whimsy, and even playfulness to the ranks of artful or poetic frivolities. Method: We use the emblems of the craftsman, the trickster, and the poet to highlight some of the oblique ways of knowing by which creative thinkers bring forth new insights. Each epitomizes dimensions intrinsic to the art of “possibilizing.” Taken together, they help us better understand what it means to be playful beyond curious, rigorous beyond reasonable, and why this should matter, even to constructivists! Results: The musings characteristic of creative individuals (artists, scientists, children) speak to intelligent beings’ ability to use glitches intentionally or serendipitously as a means to open up possibilities; to hold on to a thought before spelling it out; and to resist treating words or images as conventional and arbitrary signs regardless of their evocative power. To fall into nominalism, Bachelard insisted, is a poet’s nightmare! Implications: Psyche is image, said Jung, and when we feel alive we rely on the imaginal to guide our reason. Note that image is not here to be understood as a picture in the head or a photographic snapshot of the world. The imaginal does not represent, it brings forth what we understand beyond words. It does not lock us into a single mode. Instead, it is a call to be mindful, in Ellen Langer’s sense: in the present, mentally alert, and on the outlook for our psyche’s own surprising wisdom (sagacity. Constructivist content: Debates on the heuristic function and epistemological status of oblique ways of knowing have long occupied constructivist scholars. I can only guess whether my uses of Jung’s imaginal or Bachelard’s anti-nominalism would have amused or exasperated Ernst! I do know that, on occasion, Ernst the connoisseur, bricoleur, and translator allowed the rationalist-within to include the poet’s power to evoke as a legitimate form of rationality. He himself has written about oblique knowing as legit!

Key words: Incongruity, playfulness, mindfulness, trickster, craftsman, poet, glitches.


Ackermann E. K. (2015) Amusement, delight, and whimsy: Humor has its reasons that reason cannot ignore. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 405–411. http://constructivist.info/10/3/405

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Glasersfeld E. von & Ackermann E. K. (2011) Reflections on the Concept of Experience and the Role of Consciousness. Unfinished Fragments
Ackermann E. K. (2015) Author’s Response: Impenetrable Minds, Delusion of Shared Experience: Let’s Pretend (“dicciamo che io ero la mamma”)


Ackermann E. (2004) Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In: Tokoro M. & Steels L. (eds.) A learning zone of one’s own: Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 15–37. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ackermann E. (2013) Musings on mind and meaning: Fragments of conversation. In: Hug T., Schorner M. & Mitterer J. (eds.) Ernst von Glasersfeld Archive inauguration. Innsbrick University Press, Innsbruck: 31–36. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Apte M. L. (1985) Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Aristotle (1941) The basic works of Aristotle. Edited by Richard McKeon. Random House, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bachelard G. (1994) The poetics of space. Beacon Press, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson G. (1991) A social scientist views the emotions. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) A sacred unity. A Cornelia & Michael Bessie Book, New York: 127–131. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson G. (1991) The double-bind theory – misunderstood? In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) A sacred unity. A Cornelia & Michael Bessie Book, New York: 147–150. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beattie J. (1779) An essay on laughter and ludicrous composition. In: Beattie J., Essays: On poetry and music. E. and C. Dilly, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blumenberg H. (2015) The laughter of the Thracian woman: A protohistory of theory. Bloomsbury, New York. German original published in 1987 as: Das Lachen der Thrakerin. Eine Urgeschichte der Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boghossian P. A. (2006) Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Clarendon Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown T. & McNamara O. (2005) New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education. Springer, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cassirer E. (1944) An essay on man. Yale University Press, New Haven CT. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chronaki A. & Matos A. (2014) Technology use and mathematics teaching: Teacher change as discursive identity work. Learning, Media and Technology 39(1): 107–125. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ciompi L. (1997) Die emotionalen Grundlagen des Denkens. Entwurf einer fraktalen Affektlogik. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Duerr H. P. (ed.) (1981) Der Wissenschaftler und das Irrationale. 2 volumes. Syndikat, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Elkana Y. (2011) Rethinking the enlightenment. Approaching Religion 1(2): 3–6. http://ojs.abo.fi/index.php/ar/article/view/117/97.
Feyerabend P. K. (1962) Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In: Feigl H. & Maxwell G. (eds.) Scientific explanation, space, and time. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis: 28–97. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feyerabend P. K. (1984) Wissenschaft als Kunst. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Friesen N. & Hug T. (2011) After the mediatic turn: McLuhan’s training of the senses and media pedagogy today. In: Fromme J., Iske S. & Marotzki W. (eds.) Medialität und Realität. Zur konstitutiven Kraft der Medien. VS, Wiesbaden: 83–101. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1994) Die Struktur des individuellen Wissens. In: Felixberger P. (ed.) Aufbruch in neue Lernwelten. Passagen, Vienna: 33–39. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1997) The incommensurability of scientific and poetic knowledge. Methodologia 17: 1–7. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/199
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Metaphern als indirekte Beschreibung. In: Fischer H.-R. (ed.) Eine Rose ist ein Rose… Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist: 145–155. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/268
Handelman D. & Kapferer B. (1972) Forms of joking activity: A comparative approach. American Anthropologist 74: 484–517. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hershkowitz R., Dreyfus T., Ben-Zvi D., Friedlander A., Hadas N., Resnick T., Schwarz B. B. & Tabach M. (2002) Mathematics curriculum development for computerized environments: A designer-researcher-teacher-learner activity. In: English L. D. (ed.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ: 656–694. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hillman J. (1975) Re-visoning psychology. Harper Collins, New York NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hug T. & Perger J. (2000) Transversale als “reine” Vernunft? – Ein Plädoyer für die Relativierung des Reinheitsgebots. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. Streitforum für Erwägungskultur. 11(1): 132–134. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Huizinga J. (1955) Homo Ludens: A study of the play elements in culture. The Beacon Press, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jung C. G. (1956) On the psychology of the trickster figure. In: Radin P., The trickster: A study of American Indian mythology Translated by R. F. C. Hull. Philosophical Library, New York: 195–211. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kant I. (1911) Critique of judgment. Translated by J. Creed Meredith. Clarendon Press, Oxford. German original published in 1790. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kelly G. A. (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Volume 1. Norton, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kelly G. A. (1969) The language of hypothesis: Man’s psychological instrument. In: Maher B. (ed.) Clinical Psychology and personality. The selected papers of George Kelly. John Wiley, New York: 147–162. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kenny V. (1989) Life, the multiverse, and everything. An introduction to the ideas of Humberto Maturana. In: Goudsmit A. L. (ed.) Self-organization in psychotherapy. Demarcations of a new perspective. Springer, New York: 17–47. http://www.oikos.org/vinclife.htm
Kenny V. (2015) Transcending illusions and illusions of transcendence. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 242–245. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/10/2/242.kenny
Koestler A. (1964) The act of creation. Macmillan, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krippendorff K. (2006) The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Langer E. J. (1989) Mindfulness. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lyotard J.-F. (1989) The differend: Phrases in dispute. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. French original published in 1983 as: Le Différend. Éditions de Minuit, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mariotti M. (2002) Influences of technologies advances in students’ math learning. In: English L. D. (ed.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ: 695–723. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory. Conference workbook. The American Society for Cybernetics: 1–53. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McLuhan M. (1964) Understanding media: The extensions of man. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM, Reston VA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1951) Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. Heineman, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Plato (1921) Plato in twelve volumes, Volume 12. Translated by Harold N. Fowler. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rancière J. (1999) Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Translated by J. Rose. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. French original published in 1995. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ranciere J. (1991) The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford University Press, Stanford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Raskin V. (1985) Semantic mechanisms of humor. Reidel, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reich K. (2008) Konstruktivistische Didaktik. Lehren und Lernen aus interaktiver Sicht. Third edition including Methodenpool on CD. Beltz, Weinheim. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2011) From objects to processes: A proposal to rewrite radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 1–9 & 37–47. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/7/1/001.schmidt
Schulz B. (1993) Mityzacja rzeczywistości [The mythologization of reality] Republika Marzen. Translated by John Bates. Chimera, Warsaw: 49–50. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sennett R. (2008) The craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven CT. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simmel G. (1964) The stranger. In: Wolff K. H. (eds.) The sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press, New York: 402–408. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stiny G. (2006) Shape: Talking about seeing and doing. MIT Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Surana V. (2009) Indische Sinnesfelder in Alltag, Kunst und Philosophie. polylog. Zeitschrift für Interkulturelles Philosophieren 22: 15–24. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Welsch W. (1995) Vernunft. Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Winnicott D. W. (1971) Playing and reality. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Winnicott D. W. (1973) The child, the family, and the outside world. Penguin, Middlesex. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wittgenstein L. (1968) Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Žižek S. (2006) The parallax view. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.