Volume 11 · Number 2 · Pages 234–245
Interactivity and Enaction in Human Cognition

Matthew Isaac Harvey, Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen & Sune Vork Steffensen

Download the full text in
PDF (960 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Distributed language and interactivity are central members of a set of concepts that are rapidly developing into rigorous, exciting additions to 4E cognitive science. Because they share certain assumptions and methodological commitments with enactivism, the two have sometimes been confused; additionally, while enactivism is a well-developed paradigm, interactivity has relied more on methodological development and on a set of focal examples. Problem: The goal of this article is to clarify the core conceptual commitments of both interactivity-based and enactive approaches to cognitive science by contrasting the two and highlighting their differences in assumptions, focus, and explanatory strategies. Method: We begin with the shared commitments of interactivity and enactivism - e.g., antirepresentationalism, naturalism, interdisciplinarity, the importance of biology, etc. We then give an overview of several important varieties of enactivism, including sensorimotor and anti-representationalist enactivism, and then walk through the history of the “core” varieties, taking care to contrast Maturana’s approach with that of Varela and the current researchers following in Varela’s footsteps. We then describe the differences between this latter group and interactivity-based approaches to cognitive science. Results: We argue that enactivism’s core concepts are explanatorily inadequate in two ways. First, they mis-portray the organization of many living systems, which are not operationally closed. Second, they fail to realize that most epistemic activity (i.e., “sense-making”) depends on engagement with non-local resources. Both problems can be dealt with by adopting an interactivity-based perspective, in which agency and cognition are fundamentally distributed and involve integration of non-local resources into the local coupling of organism and environment. Implications: The article’s primary goal is theoretical clarification and exposition; its primary implication is that enactive concepts need to be modified or extended in some way in order to explain fully many aspects of cognition and directed biological activity. Or, read another way, the article’s primary implication is that interactivity already provides a rich set of concepts for doing just that, which, while closely allied with enactivism in several ways, are not enactivist concepts. Constructivist content: The article consists entirely of a comparison between two constructivist fields of theory. Key Words: Interactivity, enactivism, distributed language, radical embodied cognitive science, ecological psychology, autonomy.

Citation

Harvey M. I., Gahrn-Andersen R. & Steffensen S. V. (2016) Interactivity and enaction in human cognition. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 234–245. http://constructivist.info/11/2/234

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Ashby W. R. (1952) Design for a brain. Chapman and Hall, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Attanasi A., Cavagna A., Del Castello L., Giardina I., Grigera T. S., Jelić, A., Melillo S., Parisi L., Pohl O., Shen E. & Viale M. (2014) Information transfer and behavioural inertia in starling flocks. Nature Physics 10: 691–696. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baber C. (2015) Thinking through tools: What can tool-use tell us about distributed cognition? Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 41(1): 25–40. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baber C., Parekh M. & Cengiz T. G. (2014) Tool use as distributed cognition: How tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 116. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00116/
Bailly F. & Longo G. (2008) Extended critical situations: The physical singularity of life phenomena. Journal of Biological Systems 16(2): 309–336. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barandiaran X. E. & Di Paolo E. A. (2014) A geneological map of the concept of habit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 522. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522
Barandiaran X. E. & Egbert M. D. (2014) Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life 20: 5–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barandiaran X. E. (2012) Pushing the accelerator on enactive perception: How sensorimotor dynamics can constitute minds. Seminario Interuniversitario de Ciencia Cognitiva, XXII. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barandiaran X. E., Di Paolo E. A. & Rohde M. (2009) Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry and spatio-temporality in action. Journal of Adaptive Behavior 17(5): 367–386. http://cepa.info/324
Barrett N. F. (2015) Enactive theory and the problem of non-sense. Adaptive Behavior 23: 234–240. http://cepa.info/2472
Barrett N. F. (2015) The normative turn in enactive theory: An examination of its roots and implications. Topoi. Online first. http://cepa.info/2473
Barrows W. M. (1915) The reactions of an orb-weaving spider, Epeira Sclopetaria Clerck, to rhythmic vibrations of its web. Biological Bulletin 29(5): 316–326+328. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barth F. G. (1985) Neuroethology of the spider vibration sense. In: F. G. Barth (ed.) Neurobiology of Arachnids. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 203–229. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bingham G. P. (1988) Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science 7: 225–264. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buhrmann T. & Di Paolo E. (2014) Non-representational sensorimotor knowledge. In: Del Pobil A. P, Chinellato E., Ester Martinez-Martin E., Hallam J., Cervera E. & Morales A. (eds.) From animals to animats 13. Springer, New York: 21–31. http://cepa.info/2521
Buhrmann T., Di Paolo E. & Barandiaran X. (2013) A dynamical systems account of sensorimotor contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 285. http://cepa.info/2386
Cannon W. B. (1929) Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews 9(3): 399–431. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cavagna A., Cimarelli A., Giardina I., Parisi G., Santagati R. & Stefanini F., Massimiliano. (2010) Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. PNAS 107(26): 11865–11870. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Colombetti G. (2014) The feeling body. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. http://cepa.info/777
Cowley S. J & Nash L. (2013) Language, interactivity and solution probing: Repetition without repetition. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 187–198. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. & Gahrn-Andersen R. (2015) Deflating autonomy: Human interactivity in the emerging social world. Intellectica 63: 49–63. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. & Steffensen S. V. (2015) Coordination and language: Temporality and time-ranging. Interaction Studies 16(3): 474–494. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. & Vallée-Tourangeau F. (eds.) (2013) Cognition beyond the brain. Springer, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. (2009) Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics and Cognition 17(3): 495–507. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. (2011) Distributed language. John Benjamins, Philadelphia PA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cowley S. J. (2016) Entrenchment. In: Schmid H. J. (ed.) Entrenchment, memory and automaticity: The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning. De Gruyter, New York. In: Press. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Craig A. D. (2015) How do you feel? An interoceptive moment with your neurobiological self. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cuffari E. C. (2014) On being mindful about misunderstandings in languaging: Making sense of non-sense as the way to sharing linguistic meaning. In: Cappuccio M. & Froese T. (eds.) Enactive cognition at the edge of sense-making: Making sense of non-sense. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke UK: 207–237. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cuffari E. C., Di Paolo E. & De Jaegher H. (2014) From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14(4): 1089–1125. http://cepa.info/2516
Cummins F. (2009) Rhythm as an affordance for the entrainment of movement. Phonetics 66: 15–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cummins F. (2013) Towards an enactive account of action: Speaking and joint speaking as exemplary domains. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 178–186. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cummins J. (2012) Do the origins of biological general intelligence lie in an adaptation of the stress response? In: Simeonov P. L., Smith L. S.& Andrée C. Ehresmann A. C. (eds.) Integral biomathics. Springer, Berlin: 155–168. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. A. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. http://cepa.info/2387
De Jaegher H. & Froese T. (2009) On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior 17: 444–460. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jaegher H., Di Paolo E. & Gallagher S. (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(10): 441–447. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jesus: (2015) Autopoietic enactivism, phenomenology and the deep continuity between life and mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–25. http://cepa.info/2385
Degenaar J. & Myin E. (2014) Representation-hunger reconsidered. Synthese 191: 3639–3648. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Di Paolo E. A. (2003) Organismically-inspired robotics: Homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. In: Murase K. & Asakura T. (eds.) Dynamical systems approach to embodiment and sociality. Advanced Knowledge International, Adelaide: 19–42. http://cepa.info/2514
Di Paolo E. A. (2005) Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 429–452. http://cepa.info/2269
Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Extended life. Topoi 28(1): 9–21. http://cepa.info/322
Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Overcoming autopoiesis: An enactive detour on the way from life to society. In: Magalhães R. & Sanchez R. (eds.) Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice. Emerald, Bingley UK: 43–68. http://cepa.info/2366
Di Paolo E. A. (2015) Interactive time-travel: On the intersubjective retro-modulation of intentions. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(1–2): 49–74. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Di Paolo E. A., Rohde M. & De Jaegher H. (2010) Horizons for the enactive mind. In: Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. (eds.) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 33–88. http://cepa.info/2413
Dretske F. (1988) Explaining behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ellis N. C. & Larsen-Freeman D. (2006) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics 27(4): 558–589. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Enfield N. J. (2011) Sources of asymmetry in human interaction. In: Stivers T., Mondada L. & Steensig J. (eds.) The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 285–312. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Enfield N. J. (2013) Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Enfield N. J. (2014) Causal dynamics of language. In: Enfield N. J., Kockelman P. & Sidnell J. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 325–342. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer A. H. & Mansted A. (2008) Social functions of emotion. In: Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. & Barrett L. (eds.) Handbook of emotions. The Guilford Press, London: 456–470. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fowler C. A. (2014) Talking as doing: Language forms a public language. New Ideas in Psychology 32: 174–182. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fox A. (2009) Dushun’s huayan fajie guan men (Meditative approaches to the huayan dharmadhatu). In: Edelglass W. & Garfield J. L. (eds.) Buddhist philosophy: Essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 73–82. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 439–463. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2010) Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science 22(1): 43–68. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1): 1–36. http://cepa.info/2367
Froese T. & Fuchs T. (2012) The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 205–235. http://cepa.info/2389
Froese T. & Gallagher S. (2012) Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies 13(3): 436–468. http://cepa.info/2368
Froese T. & Stewart J. (2010) Life after Ashby: Ultrastability and the autopoietic foundations of biological autonomy. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 17(4): 7–49. http://cepa.info/387
Froese T. & Stewart J. (2012) Enactive cognitive science and the biology of cognition: A response to Humberto Maturana. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 19(4): 61–74. http://cepa.info/2388
Froese T. & Ziemke T. (2009) Enactive artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 173(3): 466–500. http://cepa.info/279
Froese T., Virgo N. & Ikegami T. (2014) Motility at the origin of life: Its characterization and a model. Artificial Life 20(1): 55–76. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T., Woodward A. & Ikegami T. (2013) Turing instabilities in biology, culture, and consciousness? On the enactive origins of symbolic material culture. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 199–214. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fuchs T. (2013) The phenomenology and development of social perspectives. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12: 655–683. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. & Hutto D. (2008) Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In: Zlatev J., Racine T. P., Sinha C. & Itkonen E. (eds.) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 17–38. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2013) The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research 25–26: 4–12. http://cepa.info/2483
Gangopadhyay N. & Kiverstein J. (2008) Enactivism and the unity of perception and action. Topoi 28: 63–73. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goldstein L. & Fowler C. A. (2003) Articulatory phonology. In: Schiller N. O. & Meyer A. S. (eds.) Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin: 159–207. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gordon D. M. (2010) Ant encounters. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Griffiths E. & Scarantino A. (2005) Emotions in the wild. In: Robbins P. & Aydede M. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 437–453. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gu X. & FitzGerald T. H. (2014) Interoceptive inference: Homeostasis and decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18(6): 269–270. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harvey M. (2015) Content in languaging: Why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences 48: 90–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Havelange V. (2010) The ontological constitution of cognition and the epistemological constitution of cognitive science: Phenomenology, enaction, and technology. In: Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. A. (eds.) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 335–359. http://cepa.info/2466
Heras-Escribano M., Noble J. & De Pinedo M. (2014) Enactivism, action and normativity: A Wittgensteinian analysis. Adaptive Behavior 23(1): 20–33. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoppitt W. & Laland K. N. (2013) Social learning. Princeton University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hurley S. (2001) Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese 129(1): 3–40. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hurley S. (2002) Concsciousness in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutchins E. (2014) The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology 27(1): 34–49. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing enactivism. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. & Satne G. (2015) The natural origins of content. Philosophia 43(3): 521–536. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. (2005) Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 389–405. http://cepa.info/2391
Hutto D. D. (2013) Exorcising action oriented representations: Ridding cognitive science of its Nazgûl. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 142–150. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. (2015) Overly enactive imagination? Radically re-imagining imagining. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 53(S1): 68–89. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D., Kirchhoff M. & Myin E. (2014) Extensive enactivism: Why keep it all in? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 706. http://cepa.info/2392
Iizuka H., Ando H. & Maeda T. (2013) Extended homeostatic adaptation model with metabolic causation in plasticity mechanism: Toward constructing a dynamic neural network model for mental imagery. Adaptive Behavior 21(4): 263–273. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jensen T. W. (2014) Emotion in languaging: Language and emotion as affective, adaptive and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 720. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson G. J., Bruner II G. C. & Kumar A. (2006) Interactivity and its facets revisited: Theory and empirical test. Journal of Advertising 35(4): 35–52. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kalupahana D. (1992) A history of Buddhist philosophy. Continuities and discontinuities. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kello C. T. & Van Orden G. C. (2009) Soft-assembly of sensorimotor function. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 13(1): 57–73. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kelso J. A. S. (1995) Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behaviour. MIT Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirsh D. (1997) Initeractivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science 25: 79–96. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirsh D. (2015) The importance of chance and interactivity in creativity. Pragmatics and Cognition 22(1): 5–26. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kiverstein J. & Rietveld E. (2015) The primacy of skilled intentionality: On Hutto and Satne’s The Natural Origins of Content. Philosophia 43(3): 1–21. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406–015–9645-z/fulltext.html
Konvalinka I., Xygalatas D., Bulbulia J., Schjødt U., Jegindø E.-M. Wallot S. & Roepstorff A. (2011) Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. PNAS 108(20): 8514–8519. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laland K. N., Odling-Smee J. & Feldman M. W. (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 131–175. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (2013) An inquiry into modes of existence. Translated by Catherine Porter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. French original published in 2012. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lemke J. (2000) Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(4): 273–290. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Loughlin V. (2014) Sensorimotor knowledge and the radical alternative. In: Bishop J. M. & Martin A. O. (eds.) Contemporary sensorimotor theory. Springer, Heidelberg: 105–116. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
MacWhinney B. (2005) The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science 17(3–4) 191–211. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malafouris L. (2013) How things shape the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malafouris L. (2015) Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind 8(4): 351–371. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Poerksen B. (2004) From being to doing. Carl-Auer Verlag. German original published in 2001. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. Reidel, Dordecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) The tree of knowledge. Shambhala Publications, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1970) Biology of cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL) Research Report BCL 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana. http://cepa.info/535
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: G. A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63. http://cepa.info/549
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics, Felton CA. http://cepa.info/597
Maturana H. R. (2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling, and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 9(3–4): 5–34. http://cepa.info/685
Maturana H. R. (2011) Ultrastability… autopoiesis? Reflective response to Tom Froese and John Stewart. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 18(1–2): 143–152. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McMillan S. J. (2006) Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions. In: Lievrouw L. A. & Livingstone S. (eds.) The Handbook of New Media. Sage, London: 205–230. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McTaggart J. M. E. (1908) The unreality of time. Mind 17: 456–473. http://www.ditext.com/mctaggart/time.html
Menary R. (2010) Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 459–463. http://cepa.info/2284
Merker B. & Okanoya K. (2007) The natural history of human language. In: Lyon C., Nehaniv C. L. & Cangelosi A. (eds.) Emergence of Communication and Language. Springer London: 403–420. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Millikan R. (2004) Varieties of Meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Miłkowski M. (2015) Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms. Biology & Philosophy 30(5): 709–728. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539–015–9481–3/fulltext.html
Miłkowski M. (2015) The hard problem of content: Solved (long ago). Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 41(1): 73–88. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mossio M. & Taraborelli D. (2008) Action-dependent perceptual invariants: From ecological to sensorimotor approaches. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 1324–1340. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Muntean I. & Wright C. D. (2007) Autonomous agency AI, and allostasis: A biomimetic perspective. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(3): 485–513. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Myin E. & Hutto D. (2015) REC: Just radical enough. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 41(1): 61–71. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Myin E. & O’Regan K. (2002) Perceptual consciousness, access to modality and skill theories. A way to naturalize phenomenology? Journal of Consciousness Studies 9(1): 27–46. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2009) Out of our heads. Macmillan, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2012) Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan K. & Noë A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 939–1031. http://cepa.info/2285
O’Regan K. & Noë A. (2001) What is it like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese 129(1): 79–103. http://cepa.info/2394
O’Regan K. (2011) Why red doesn’t sound like a bell. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan K., Myin E. & Noë A. (2005) Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of “corporality”and “alerting capacity.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 369–387. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pedersen S. B. (2012) Interactivity in health care: Bodies, values and dynamics. Language Sciences 34(5): 532–542. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Port R. F. (2010) Language as a social institution: Why phonemes and words do not live in the brain. Ecological Psychology 22: 304–326. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Port R. F. (2010) Rich memory and distributed phonology. Language Sciences 32: 43–55. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Prinz J. (2006) Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche 12(1): 1–19. http://cepa.info/2395
Rączaszek-Leonardi J. & Cowley S. (2012) The evolution of language as controlled collectivity. Interaction Studies 13(1): 1–16. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rączaszek-Leonardi J. (2014) Multiple systems and multiple timescales of language dynamics: Coping with complexity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 21(1–2): 37–52. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ramscar M. & Port R. F. (2016) How spoken languages work in the absence of an inventory of discrete units. Language Sciences 53: 58–74. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ratcliffe M. (2012) Feelings of being. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rosch E. (1999) Reclaiming concepts. In: Núñez R. & Freeman W. J. (eds.) Reclaiming cognition. Imprint Academic, Thorverton UK: 61–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rowlands M. (2010) The new sciences of the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rudrauf D., Lutz A., Cosmelli D., Lechaux J.-P. & Le van Quyen M. (2003) From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela’s exploration of the biophysics of being. Biological Research 36: 27–65. http://cepa.info/1140
Ruiz-Mirazo K. & Moreno A. (2012) Autonomy in evolution: From minimal to complex life. Synthese 185: 21–52. http://cepa.info/2522
Schulkin J. (2011) Adaptation and well-being: Social allostasis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schulkin J. (2011) Social allostasis: Anticipatory regulation of the internal milieu. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 2: 3389. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seth A. K. (2013) Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(11): 565–573. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seth A. K. (2014) The cybernetic Bayesian brain. In: Metzinger T. & Windt J. (eds.) Open MIND. MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main: 35(T). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V. & Cowley S. (2010) Signifying bodies and health. In: Cowley S. J. Major J. C., Steffensen S. V. & Dinis A. (eds.) Signifying bodies: Biosemiosis, interaction and health. Portuguese Catholic University, Braga: 331–356. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V. & Fill A. (2014) Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences 41: 6–25. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V. & Pedersen S. B. (2014) Temporal dynamics in human interaction. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 21(1–2): 80–97. http://cepa.info/2396
Steffensen S. V. (2011) Beyond mind. In: Cowley S. J. (ed.) Distributed language. John Benjamins, Philadelphia PA: 185–210. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V. (2013) Human interactivity. In: Cowley S. J. & Vallée-Tourangeau F. (eds.) Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interacivity, and Human Artifice. Springer, London: 195–223. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V. (2015) Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences 50: 105–119. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffensen S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau F. & Vallée-Tourangeau G. (2015) Cognitive events in a problem solving task: A qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28(1): 79–105. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steiner P. & Stewart J. (2009) From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 8: 527–550. http://cepa.info/476
Sterelny K. (2010) Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 465–481. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sterelny K. (2012) The evolved apprentice. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sterling P. (2004) Principles of allostasis: Optimal design, predictive regulation, pathophysiology, and rational therapeutics. In: Schulkin J. (ed.) Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of physiological adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 17–64. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sterling P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior 106(1): 5–15. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. (eds.) (2010) Enaction. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thibault J. (2011) First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language View. Ecological Psychology 23: 210–245. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. & Stapleton M. (2009) Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi 28: 23–30. http://cepa.info/2290
Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 381–398. http://cepa.info/1137
Thompson E. (2005) Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 407–427. http://cepa.info/2358
Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2011) Reply to commentaries. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18(5–6): 176–223. http://cepa.info/2347
Torrance S. & Froese T. (2011) An inter-enactive approach to agency: Participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humana Mente 15: 21–53. http://cepa.info/388
Turner J. S. (2000) The extended organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turvey M. T. (2007) Action and perception at the level of synergies. Human Movement Science 26: 657–697. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uryu M., Steffensen S. V. & Kramsch C. (2013) The ecology of intercultural interaction: Timescales, temporal ranges and identity dynamics. Language Sciences 41: 41–59. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
van Orden G., Holden J. & Turvey M. T. (2003) Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132(3): 331–350. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. & Shear J. (eds.) (1999) The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, Thorverton UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier North Holland, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1987) Laying down a path in walking. In: Thompson W. I. (ed.) Gaia: A way of knowing. Political implications of the new biology. Lindisfarne Press, Hudson NY: 48–64. http://cepa.info/2069
Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. I. (ed.) Organism and the Origins of Self. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 79–107. http://cepa.info/1959
Varela F. J. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop “Autopoiesis an Perception.” Dublin City University, Dublin: 4–14. http://cepa.info/1274
Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition 34: 72–87. http://cepa.info/2010
Varela F. J., Maturana H. R. & Uribe R. (1974) Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5(4): 187–196. http://cepa.info/546
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vernon D., Lowe R., Thill S. & Zieme T. (2015) Embodied cognition and circular causality: On the role of constitutive autonomy in the reciprocal coupling of perception and action. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1660. http://cepa.info/2523
Virgo N., Egbert M. D. & Froese T. (2011) The role of the spatial boundary in autopoiesis. In: Kampis G., Karsai I. & Szathmáry E. (eds.) Advances in artificial life: Darwin meets von Neumann. 10th European conference on artificial life (ECAL 2009) Springer, Berlin: 234–241. http://cepa.info/2254
Weber A. & Varela F. J. (2002) Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 97–125. http://cepa.info/2087
Whitehead A. N. (1967) Science and the modern world. Free Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wilson A. D. & Golonka S. (2013) Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 58. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wingfield J. C. (2004) Allostatic load and life cycles: Implications for neuroendocrine control mechanisms. In: Schulkin J. (ed.) Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 302–342. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.