Download the full text in
PDF (144 kB)
Upshot: I offer responses to the commentaries on my target article in five short sections. The first section, about the plurality of lived worlds, concerns issues of quite general interest to readers of this journal. The second section presents some reasons for rejecting “enabling” as well as “constitutive” representational approaches to understanding the mind. In the remaining three sections, I clarify aspects of sensorimotor direct realism relating to the self, qualia, counterfactuals, and the notion of “mastery.”
Beaton M. (2016) Author’s response: The personal level in sensorimotor theory. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 289–297. http://constructivist.info/11/2/289
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.