Download the full text in
PDF (169 kB)
Upshot: Gibsonian and enactivist thinkers appear to diverge primarily with respect to the emphasis placed on the contributions of the organism to perception-action. Enactivists claim that a fundamental asymmetry in the organism-environment relationship should be credited for the existence of meaning in the world. Gibsonians counter that theory must reckon with both the asymmetry and symmetry between organism and environment as well as with the role of specificational information in underwriting their coordination.
Fultot M. F., Nie L. & Carello C. (2016) Authors’ response: Complementarity of symmetry and asymmetry. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 335–345. http://constructivist.info/11/2/335
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.