Volume 11 · Number 2 · Pages 354–356
On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology

Michel Bitbol & Elena Antonova

Download the full text in
PDF (84 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: We point out that the significance of the neurophenomenological approach to the “hard problem” of consciousness is underrated and misunderstood by the authors of the target article. In its original version, neurophenomenology implies nothing less than a change in our own being to dispel the mere sense that there is a problem to be theoretically solved or dissolved. Neurophenomenology thus turns out to be much more radical than the enactivist kind of dissolution promoted by the authors.

Citation

Bitbol M. & Antonova E. (2016) On the too often overlooked radicality of neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 354–356. http://constructivist.info/11/2/354

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.