Volume 12 · Number 3 · Pages 316–325
Audience and Eigenform: Cybersemiotic Epistemology and the “Truth of the Human Spirit” in Performance

Tom Scholte

Download the full text in
PDF (684 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Despite the best efforts of postmodern, social constructivist scholars to discredit the notion that “realistic” works of theatre and film could contain genuine onto-epistemic goods, many lay observers (i.e., audiences) continue to describe individual performances and productions as more or less “truthful” than one another. Recently, some performance scholars have pushed back against the postmodern position and turned to contemporary cognitive science to undergird their insistence that the embodied nature of reception and perception does, in fact, allow audiences of such works to access “truths” within them. The literature of cybernetics (first- or second-order) has been almost entirely absent from the debate. Problem: While the hardcore scepticism of social constructivism may be unsatisfactory in fully accounting for the enduring power and appeal of dramatic art, a retreat to epistemic certainty in the name of cognitive science would be equally unwise. This article proposes the notion of “eigenbehavior” as a conceptual bridge that might facilitate the synthesis of the most useful insights from both perspectives and open up new avenues of study and research. Method: The article uses synthetic argumentation to propose a theory of eigenform within the context of theatrical performance. Results: Emerging from this argumentation is a conception of eigenform that is novel in its emphasis on the distinction between its bio-structured and socio-structured features. Implications: The insights in this article will be of value to scholars and practitioners of the dramatic arts and can be productively extended into cognate domains across the humanities. Constructivist content: The article draws on the works of constructivists such as von Glasersfeld, von Foerster, Maturana, Varela, and Luhmann and is grounded in such constructivist perspectives as cybersemiotics, theory of autopoiesis, and systems theory. Key Words: Social systems, semiotics, language, acting, culture, ethics.

Citation

Scholte T. (2017) Audience and eigenform: Cybersemiotic epistemology and the “truth of the human spirit” in performance. Constructivist Foundations 12(3): 316–325. http://constructivist.info/12/3/316

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Ashby W. R. (1964) An introduction to cybernetics. Methuen, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Auslander P. (1998) From acting to performance: Essays in modernism and postmodernism. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. E. P. Dutton, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer S. (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Benedetti J. (1998) Stanislavski and the actor. Routledge, New York NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blair R. (2000) The method and the computational theory of mind. In: Krasner D. (ed.) Method acting reconsidered. St. Martin’s Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boal A. (1985) Theatre of the oppressed. Translated by Charles A. McBride, Maria-Odilia Leal McBride and Emily Fryer. Theatre Communications Group, New York NY. Spanish original published in 1974. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boulding K. E. (1956) The image: Knowledge in life and society. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor MI. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brün H. (2003) Irresistible observations. Non Sequitur Press, Champaign IL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brecht B. (1974) Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic. Eyre Methuen, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brier S. (2008) Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunnell P. (2008) Editorial foreword. In: Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller’s G., The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic, Exeter: V-xxi. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunnell P. (2015) Dancing with ambiguity. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(4): 101–112 http://cepa.info/3487
Campbell D. T. (1974) “Downward causation” in hierarchically organised biological systems. In: Ayala F. J. & Dobzhansky T. (eds.) Studies in the philosophy of biology: Reduction and related problems. Macmillan, London: 179–186. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Case S.-E. (1983) Classic drag: The Greek creation of female parts. Theatre Journal 37(3): 317–327. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Case S.-E. (ed.) (1996) Split britches, Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cavaliere A. (2017) Stanislavsky in Brazil: Territories and frontiers. In: Pitches J. & Aquilina S. (eds.) Stanislavsky in the world: The system and its transformations across continent. Bloomsbury, London: 213–237. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clarke B. & Chansky D. (2016) Audience and autopoiesis. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 610–612 http://constructivist.info/11/3/610
Clarke B. (2009) Heinz von Foerster’s demons: The emergence of second-order systems theory. In: Clarke B. & Hansen M. B. N. (eds.) Emergence and embodiment: New Essays on second-order systems theory. Duke University, Durham: 35–61. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Counsell C. (1996) Signs of performance: An introduction to twentieth century theatre. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Diamond E. (1989) Mimesis, mimicry, and the “true-real.” Modern Drama 32(1): 58–72. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Diderot D. (2015) Paradoxe sur le comédien. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, North Charleston SC. Written between 1772 and 1777; first published in 1830. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dilts R., Epstein T. & Dilts R. W. (1991) Tools for dreamers: Strategies of creativity and the structure of innovation. Meta Publications, Capitola CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dolan J. (1991) The feminist spectator as critic. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Elam K. (1988) The semiotics of theatre and drama. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Espejo R. & Dominici G. (2017) Cybernetics of value cocreation for product development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 34(1): 24–40 http://cepa.info/4131
Espejo R. (2015) Performance for viability: Complexity and variety management. Kybernetes 44(6/7): 1020–1029. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Flemons D. G. (1991) Completing distinctions: Interweaving the ideas of Gregory Bateson and Taoism into a unique approach to therapy. Shambhala, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1981) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-) behaviors. In: Foerster H. von, Observing Systems. Intersystems Publications, Salinas CA: 274–285. Originally published in 1976 http://cepa.info/1270
Foerster H. von (1981) Observing systems. Intersystems Publications, Salinas CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2003) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-) behaviors. In. Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding: Essays in cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–271. Originally published in 1976 http://cepa.info/1270
García de la Cerda O. & Saavedra Ulloa M. S. (2006) Self management: An innovative tool for enactive human design. In: Adam F., Brézillon P., Carlsson S. & Humphreys P. (eds.) Creativity and innovation in decision making and decision support. Volume 1. Decision Support Press, London: 195–214. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García de la Cerda O. (2009) Human re-engineering for action: An enactive educational management program. Kybernetes 38(7/8): 1332–1334. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2012) Inside every white box are two black boxes trying to get out. In: Glanville R., The black boox. Volume I: Cybernetic circles. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 439–453. Originally published in 1982 http://cepa.info/2365
Glasersfeld E. von (1980) The concept of equilibration in a constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Benseler F., Hejl P. M. & Köck W. K. (eds.) Autopoiesis, communication, and society. Campus, Franfurt: 75–85 http://cepa.info/1352
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London http://cepa.info/1462
Hagen U. & Frankell H. (1973) Respect for acting. Wiley, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hauskeller M., Philbeck T. D. & Carbonell C. D. (2015) The Palgrave handbook of posthumanism in film and television. Palgrave McMillan, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Herbrechter S. (2010) Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Huxley A. (1954) The doors of perception. Harper & Brothers, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kauffman L. H. (2005) EigenForm. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 129–150 http://cepa.info/1271
Kauffman L. H. (2009) Reflexivity and eigenform: The shape of process. Constructivist Foundations 4(3): 121–137 http://constructivist.info/4/3/121
Kauffman L. H. (2015) Self-reference, biologic and the structure of reproduction. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 119(3): 382–409 http://cepa.info/2844
Kauffman L. H. (2016) Cybernetics, reflexivity, and second-order science. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 489–495 http://constructivist.info/11/3/489
Kleist H. von (1972) On the marionette theatre. The Drama Review 16(3): 22–26. German original published in 1810. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Knowles R. (2014) How theatre means. Palgrave Macmillan, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krippendorff K. (2009) A constructivist critique of semiotics. In: Krippendorff K., On communicating: Otherness, meaning and information. Edited by F. Bermejo. Routledge, New York: 173–190 http://cepa.info/4159
Landgraf E. (2016) Naturalism in improvisation and embodiment. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 613–615 http://constructivist.info/11/3/613
Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1959) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE) 47(11): 1940–1951 http://cepa.info/518
Lettvin J. Y., Maturana H. R., McCulloch W. S. & Pitts W. H. (1968) What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. In: Corning W. C. & Balaban M. (eds.) “The mind: Biological approaches to its functions” Interscience Publishers, New York: 233–258. Originally published in 1959. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Liu S. (2017) Towards a Chinese school of performance and directing: Jiao Juyin. In: Pitches J. & Aquilina S. (eds.) Stanislavsky in the world: The system and its transformations across continent. Bloomsbury, London: 149–165. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford. German original published in 1984. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2000) Art as a social system. Stanford University Press, Stanford. German original published in 1995. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2003) Introduction to systems theory. Stanford University Press, Stanford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2008) Law as a social system. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2013) A systems theory of religion. Stanford University Press, Stanford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maruyama M. (1963) The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist 5(2): 164–179 http://cepa.info/4092
Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller G. (2008) The origins of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63 http://cepa.info/549
Maturana H. R. (2005) The origin and conservation of self-consciousness: Reflections on four questions by Heinz von Foerster. Kybernetes 34(1/2) 54–88 http://cepa.info/702
Mulvey L. (1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen 16(3): 6–18. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nagel T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review LXXXIII 4(435–50) ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nayar P. K. (2014) Posthumanism. Polity, Malden MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rajan T. (2001) In the wake of cultural studies: Globalization, theory, and the university. Diacritics 31(3): 67–88. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Richards L. D. (2013) Difference-making from a cybernetic perspective: The role of listening and its circularities. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 20(1/2): 59–68. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roach J. (1993) The player’s passion: Studies in the science of acting. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rocha L. M. (1996) Eigenbehavior and symbols. Systems Research 13(3): 371–384 http://cepa.info/1275
Rokotnitz N. (2011) Trusting performance: A cognitive approach to embodiment in drama. Palgrave and Macmillan, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholte T. (2015) Proto-cybernetics in the Stanislavski System of Acting: Past foundations, present analyses and future prospects. Kybernetes 44(8–9): 1371–1379. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholte T. (2016) “Black box” theatre: Second-order cybernetics and naturalism in rehearsal and performance. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 598–608 http://constructivist.info/11/3/598
Sharon T. (2014) Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Springer, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stanislavski C. (1968) Stanislavski’s legacy. Translated by E. Hapgood. Methuen, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tian M. (2008) The poetics of difference and displacement. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391. German original published in 1934 http://cepa.info/2403
Ulrich W. (1996) Critical systems thinking for citizens. In: Flood R. L. & Romm N. R. A. (eds.) Critical systems thinking. Springer, New York: 165–178. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wolfe C. (2009) Human, all too human: “Animal studies” and the humanities. PMLA 124(2): 564–575. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wolfe C. (2010) What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.