Volume 13 · Number 1 · Pages 160–167
From Problem Solving to Problem Posing, and from Strategies to Laying Down a Path in Solving: Taking Varela’s Ideas to Mathematics Education Research

Jérôme Proulx & Jean-François Maheux

Download the full text in
PDF (1203 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: There has always been a tremendous and varied amount of work on problem-solving in mathematics education research. However, despite its variety, most if not all work in problem-solving shares similar epistemological assumptions about the fact that there is a problem to be solved and that solvers make an explicit selection of a strategy and apply it to solve the problem. Problem: Varela’s ideas about problem-posing provide a means of going beyond these assumptions about problem-solving processes. We propose to explain and illustrate the way we found inspiration from these ideas in our work through a discussion grounded in data excerpts collected in our research studies on mental mathematics. Method: Concrete data and observations are referred to for discussing issues related to problem-solving processes and activity in mathematics. Results: Engaging with Varela’s work led us to revisit and reformulate many common notions in relation to mathematical problem-solving, namely concerning the meaning of a problem and of a strategy, as well as the relationship between the posing and solving of a problem. Through this, these notions are conceived as dynamic in nature and co-constitutive of one another. This leads us to engage in what we call the dialectical relationship between posing and solving. Implications: We illustrate the sort of educational insights that might be drawn from such conceptualizations, mostly in terms of affecting the way we look at students’ productions and engagements in mathematics not as pre-fixed or pre-definable entities, but as activities that emerge in the midst of doing mathematics.

Key words: Mathematical activity, problem-solving, problem-posing, strategies, emergence

Citation

Proulx J. & Maheux J.-F. (2017) From problem solving to problem posing, and from strategies to laying down a path in solving: Taking varela’s ideas to mathematics education research. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 160–167. http://constructivist.info/13/1/160

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Porr B. & Di Prodi P. (2014) Subsystem Formation Driven by Double Contingency
Scholl A. (2010) Radical Constructivism in Communication Science
Proulx J. & Maheux J.-F. (2017) Authors’ Response: On Posing|Solving Research
Riegler A. & Quale A. (2010) Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor?
Füllsack M. (2013) Constructivism and Computation: Can Computer-Based Modeling Add to the Case for Constructivism?

References

Bautista A. & Roth W.-M. (2012) Conceptualizing sound as a form of incarnate mathematical consciousness. Educational Studies in Mathematics 79(1): 41–59. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Borasi R. (1987) Exploring mathematics through the exploration of errors. For the Learning of Mathematics 7(3): 2–8. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Borasi R. (1992) Learning mathematics through inquiry. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Borasi R. (1996) Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown L. & Coles A. (2012) Developing “deliberate analysis” for learning mathematics and for mathematics teacher education: How the enactive approach to cognition frames reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics 80(1–2): 217–231. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown S. I. & Walter M. I. (2005) The art of problem posing. Third edition. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bruner J. S. (1961) The act of discovery. Harvard educational review 31: 21–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cifarelli V. V. & Sevim V. (2014) Examining the role of re-presentation in mathematical problem solving: An application of Ernst von Glasersfeld’s conceptual analysis. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 360–369. http://constructivist.info/9/3/360
Davis B. (1995) Why teach mathematics? Mathematics education and enactivist theory. For the Learning of Mathematics 15(2): 2–9. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davis B., Sumara D. & Kieren T. (1996) Cognition, co-emergence, curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(2): 151–169. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gargani A. G. (2009) Le savoir sans fondements: La conduite intellectuelle comme structuration de l’expérience commune [Knowledge without foundations: Intellectual behavior as the structuring of common experience]. Paris, Vrin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gould S. J. (1983) The mismeasure of men. Norton NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lave J. (1988) Cognition in practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lockhart P. (2009) A mathematician’s lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art form. Bellevue, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maheux J.-F. & Roth W.-M. (2011) Relationality and mathematical knowing. For the Learning of Mathematics 31(3): 36–41. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mason J. (2009) Mathematics education: Theory, practice and memories over 50 years. In: Lerman S. & Davis B. (eds.) Mathematical action and structures of noticing: Studies on John Mason’s contribution to mathematics education. Sense, Rotterdam: 1–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1992) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Revised edition. Shambhala, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Osana H., Proulx J., Adrien E. & Nadeau D. (2013) Developing relational thinking in preservice teachers. In: Proceedings of 35th annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Chicago: 845–848. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1972) Teaching children to be mathematicians versus teaching about mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education, Sciences and Technology 3: 249–262. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1981) Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Polya G. (1957) How to solve it. Second edition. Doubleday, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J. (2013) Mental mathematics, emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84(3): 309–328. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J. (2016) Living (in) different enactivist worlds: A mathematics education researcher’s point of view on enactivism. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 226–227. http://constructivist.info/11/2/226
Proulx J., Lavallée-Lamarche M.-L. & Tremblay K.-P. (2017) Équations algébriques et activité mathématique en calcul mental: Regard sur les défis d’enseignement [Algebraic equations and mathematical activity in mental computation: Focus on teaching challenges]. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives 22: 43–65. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J., Osana H., Nadeau D. & Adrien E. (2013) On the emergence of mental mathematics strategies. In: Proceedings of 35th annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Chicago: 328. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
René de Cotret S. (1999) Perspective bio-cognitive pour l’étude des relations didactiques. In: Lemoyne G. & Conne F. (eds.) Le cognitif en didactique des mathématiques [Cognition in mathematics education]. Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal: 103–120. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roschelle J. & Teasley S. D. (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley C. (ed.) Computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, Berlin: 69–197. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W. M. & Maheux J. F. (2015) The stakes of movement: A dynamic approach to mathematical thinking. Curriculum Inquiry 45(3): 266–284. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Santos-Trigo M. (2014) Problem solving in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Springer, Dordrecht: 496–501. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schoenfeld A. H. (2014) Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press, Orlando FL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simmt E. (2000) Mathematics knowing in action: A fully embodied interpretation. PhD dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Törner G., Schoenfeld A. H. & Reiss K. M. (2007) Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. ZDM 39(5): 353. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thom J. S., Namukasa I. K., Ibrahim-Didi K. & McGarvey L. M. (2009) Perceptually guided action: Invoking knowing as enaction. In: Tzekaki M., Kaldrimidou M. & Sakonidis H. (eds.) Proceedings of Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Volume 1. PME, Thessaloniki: 249–278. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Threlfall J. (2002) Flexible mental calculations. Educational Studies in Mathematics 50(1): 29–47. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Threlfall J. (2009) Strategies and flexibility in mental calculation. ZDM 41(5): 541–555. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1987) Laying down a path in walking. In: Thompson W. I. (ed.) Gaia: A way of knowing. Political implications of the new biology. Lindisfarne Press, New York: 48–64. http://cepa.info/2069
Varela F. J. (1991) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop “Autopoiesis and Perception.” Dublin City University, Dublin: 4–14. http://cepa.info/1274
Varela F. J. (1996) Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Translated by Pierre Lavoie. Éditions du Seuil, Paris. A shorter English version was published as: Varela F. J. (1991) Whence the origin of perception? A cartography of current ideas. In: Varela F. J. & Dupuy J. P.(eds.) Understanding origins: Contemporary ideas on the origin of life, mind and society. Kluwer, Boston: 235–265. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1999) Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press, Stanford. http://cepa.info/2119
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Yevdokimov O. & Passmore T. (2008) Problem solving activities in a constructivist framework: Exploring how students approach difficult problems. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Volume 2. MERGA, Brisbane: 629–636. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zack V. & Reid D. A. (2003) Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas (Part 1) For the Learning of Mathematics 23(3): 43–50. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zack V. & Reid D. A. (2004) Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas (Part 2) For the Learning of Mathematics 24(1): 24–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.