Volume 13 · Number 2 · Pages 282–291
Plasticity, Granularity and Multiple Contingency - Essentials for Conceiving an Artificial Constructivist Agent

Manfred Füllsack

Download the full text in
PDF (1306 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Attempts to conceive artificial agents are manifold. Often, however, basic aspects are overlooked, which in this case seem to be implemented already in current technologies. Problem: Agency is often conceived individualistically. Agents are seen as separate entities. This contribution sets out to conceive agents as emerging from the interaction of a multitude of agents. I claim that, somehow paradoxically, agents become agents only in the course of interaction. Method: A conception for conceiving constructivist agents illustrated with multi-agent simulations and artificial neural networks. I stress three aspects: double (or multiple) contingency, plasticity and granularity, which I consider relevant for conceiving artificial constructivist agents and which seem to find certain analogies in the methodology of artificial neural networks. Results: Constructivist agents should be conceived as emerging concurrently as a multitude of agents, providing one another with “irritations” to which agents need to adapt in order to evolve agency. In order to facilitate adaptation, they need what I call plasticity. In its turn, in order to guarantee sufficient adaptability, plasticity needs a certain degree of granularity. Implications: Researchers involved in the technical development of contemporary machine learning methods may not be aware that fundamentals of their methodology conform well to the epistemology of constructivism, just as constructivists may not be aware that their epistemology finds analogies in the technique of artificial neural networks. This contribution tries to raise these awarenesses. Constructivist content: Agents are conceived as developing agency (that is, they are developing themselves) on the basis of their on-board means. There is no need for assuming any “outside” but only “irritations” generating dissonances in the on-board means.

Key words: Artificial agency, multiple contingency, plasticity, granularity, public good game, artificial neural networks.


Füllsack M. (2018) Plasticity, granularity and multiple contingency - essentials for conceiving an artificial constructivist agent. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 282–291. http://constructivist.info/13/2/282

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Füllsack M. (2015) Who Downed MH-17, or Do Collective Observations Interact Non-Linearly?
Füllsack M. (2014) IC and the Observed/Observer Duality
Füllsack M. (2013) Constructivism and Computation: Can Computer-Based Modeling Add to the Case for Constructivism?
Füllsack M. (2016) Circularity and the Micro-Macro-Difference
Füllsack M. (2014) Author’s Response: Verbal Limitations of Observer-inclusion


Attneave F. (1954) Informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61: 183–193. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Crutchfield J. P. (1994) The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 75(1): 11–54. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Epstein J. M. (1998) Zones of cooperation in demographic prisoner’s dilemma. Complexity 4(2): 36–48. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1976) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum 8(3–4): 91–96. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–271. http://cepa.info/1270
Forrest S. (ed.) (1990) Emergent computation. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heider F. (2005) Ding und Medium. Kulturverlag Kadmos, Berlin. Originally published in 1926. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kauffman S. (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kuzmics C. (2014) Coordination with independent private values: Why pedestrians sometimes bump into each other. Institute of Mathematical Economics Working Paper 501. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2391198
Luhmann N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63. http://cepa.info/549
Parsons T. (1951) The social system. Free Press, Glencoe IL. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1960) Child’s conception of geometry. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rey G. D. & Wender K. F. (2017) Neuronale Netze: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen, Anwendungen und Datenauswertung. Hans Huber, Bern. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ripley B. D. (2007) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Silva I. N., Spatti D. H., Flauzino R. A., Liboni L. H. B. & Reis Alves S. F. (2016) Artificial neural networks: A practical course. Springer, New York NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spencer Brown G. (1969) Laws of form. Allen & Unwin, London. http://cepa.info/422
Steels L. & Kaplan F. (2000) AIBO’s first words: The social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication 4(1): 3–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steels L. (2015) The talking heads experiment: Origins of words and meanings. Language Science Press, Berlin. http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/49
Strogatz S. (2003) Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature and daily life. Hyperion, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Watts D. J. & Strogatz S. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393: 440–442. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.