Volume 14 · Number 1 · Pages 42–55
Neurodialectics: A Proposal for Philosophy of Cognitive and Social Sciences

Nicolas Zaslawski

Download the full text in
PDF (230 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Most recent attempts to define cognition dialectically lack the philosophical completeness necessary to explain neurocognitive and mental processes. Problem: Under what conditions could neurophenomenology be thought of as dialectical and what would be the implications of such a conception for contemporary issues such as “social cognition” and phenomenological subjectivity? Method: I assess dialectical approaches to neurocognitive processes and mind mostly within the recent neurophenomenological literature and provide reasons as to why these approaches could be further improved using Hegel’s conception of dialectical processes. Results: As suggested in the context of research on extended cognition, mostly by Gallagher and Crisafi, a cognitively shaped understanding of Hegel’s philosophy allows us to understand how neurophenomenology can be conceptualized dialectically. It allows us to conceive precisely of how dialectical processes can help shape our understanding of cognition from individual neurocognitive operations to socially embedded processes. A dialectical interpretation of Varela’s conception of neurocognitive processes can help achieve the endeavor of recent sociological work to understand the “continuity” from individual to social “entities” through a “relational ontology.” This amounts to expanding, through a neurodialectical framework, Gallagher’s research on extended cognition as well as articulating it with his most recent conception of “decentered” cognition. Implications: Neurodialectics has straightforward implications for phenomenological understandings of subjectivity as well as for recent sociological research: in both cases, it can provide us with a philosophically meaningful and empirically sustainable framework. In particular, it could help philosophically expand Gallagher’s “decentered” model of brainhood. Constructivist Content: I argue in favor of a general philosophical perspective, the neurodialectical one, stressing the “primacy of moulding on being.”

Key words: Dialectics, philosophy of mind, phenomenology, neurophenomenology, philosophy of social science, philosophy of cognitive science.


Zaslawski N. (2018) Neurodialectics: A proposal for philosophy of cognitive and social sciences. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 42–55. http://constructivist.info/14/1/042

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Kordeš U. (2016) Going Beyond Theory: Constructivism and Empirical Phenomenology
Zaslawski N. & Arminjon M. (2018) Shaun Gallagher and the Sciences of the Mind: Recontextualizing “Decentered” Cognition
Le Moigne J.-L. (2011) From Jean Piaget to Ernst von Glasersfeld: An Epistemological Itinerary in Review
Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being


Andler D. (2016) La silhouette de l’humain. Gallimard, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Balibar É. & Macherey P. (2015) Dialectique. In: Dictionnaire de la Philosophie. Encyclopaeida Universalis, Paris: 1783–1827. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barbaras R. (1999) The movement of the living as the originary foundation of perceptual intentionality. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford: 525–538. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barbaras R. (2001) Merleau-Ponty et la psychologie de la forme. Les études philosophiques 2(57): 151–163. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barbaras R. (2008) Introduction à une phénoménologie de la vie. Vrin, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barbaras R. (2015) The phenomenology of life: Desire as the being of the subject. In: Zahavi D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 94–11. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bimbenet É. (2015) L’invention du réalisme. Cerf, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bitbol M. & Antonova E. (2016) On the too often overlooked radicality of neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 354–356 http://constructivist.info/11/2/354
Bitbol M. (2014) La conscience a-t-elle une origine? Flammarion, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Carel H. & Meacham D. (2013) Phenomenology and naturalism: Editor’s introduction. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 72: 1–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chalmers D. (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Crisafi A. & Gallagher S. (2010) Hegel and the extended mind. Artificial Intelligence & Society 25(1): 123–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2002) Confronting death before death: Between imminence and unpredictability. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 83–95. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N., Varela F. J. & Vermersch P. (2003) On becoming aware. John Benjamins, Philadelphia. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feuerhahn W. (2011) Un tournant neurocognitiviste en phénoménologie? Sur l’acclimatation des neurosciences dans le paysage philosophique français. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 2(25): 59–79. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Forest D. (2016) Is an anatomy of melancholia possible? Brain processes, depression and mood regulation. In: J. C. Wakefield & S. Demazeux (eds.) Sadness or depression? Springer, Dordrecht: 95–107. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. & Crisafi A. (2009) Mental institutions. Topoi 28: 45 51. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (1997) Mutual enlightenment: Recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(3): 195–214 http://cepa.info/2276
Gallagher S. (2015) On the possibility of naturalizing phenomenology. In: Zahavi D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 70–93. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2018) Decentering the brain: Embodied cognition and the critique of neurocentrism and narrow-minded philosophy of mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 8–21 http://constructivist.info/14/1/008 (this issue)
Gasparyan D. (2016) Not to avoid but legitimize: Why the gap could be natural for the enactive world. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 356–358 http://constructivist.info/11/2/356
Hegel G. W. F. (1977) Phenomenology of spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford University Press, Oxford. German original published in 1807. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hegel G. W. F. (2010) Philosophy of mind. Translated by W. Wallace & A. V. Miller. Revision, introduction and commentaries by M. Inwood. Oxford University Press, Oxford. German original published in 1830. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hegel G. W. F. (2010) The science of logic. Translated by G. di Giovanni. Cambridge University Press, New York. German original published in 1816. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hegel G. W. F. (2011) Principes de la philosophie du droit. Translated by J.-F. Kervégan. PUF, Paris. German original published in 1820. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kaufmann L. & Cordonier L. (2011) Vers un naturalisme social. SociologieS 18 October 2011. http://sociologies.revues.org/3595
Kaufmann L. & Cordonier L. (2012) Les sociologues ont-ils perdu l’esprit? SociologieS 27 January 2012. http://sociologies.revues.org/3899
Kaufmann L. (2016) La “ligne brisée”: Ontologie relationnelle, réalisme social et imagination morale. Revue du MAUSS 1(47): 105–128. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kervegan J.-F. (2011) Présentation. L’institution de la liberté. In G. W. F. Hegel Principes de la philosophie du droit. Paris, PUF: 1–86. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. D. & Hutto D. D. (2016) Never mind the gap: Neurophenomenology, radical enactivism, and the hard problem of consciousness. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 346–353 http://constructivist.info/11/2/346
Lalande A. (1947) Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie. PUF, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malabou C. (2005) The future of Hegel. Translated by L. During. Routledge, London. French original published in 1996. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malabou C. (2008) What should we do with our brain? Translated by S. Rand. Fordham University Press, New York. French original published in 2004. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malabou C. (2015) L’avenir de Hegel. Vrin, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Morris D. (2013) From the nature of meaning to a phenomenological refiguring of nature. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 72: 317–341. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J.-M. (eds.) (1999) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quéré L. (2011) De vieilles obsessions sous des habits neufs? SociologieS 18 October 2011. http://sociologies.revues.org/3744
Renault E. (2001) Hegel: La naturalisation de la dialectique. Vrin, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Renault E. (2012) The naturalistic side of Hegel’s pragmatism. Critical Horizons 13(2): 244–274. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stanciu O. (2017) De la manifestation au réel. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale (95) 303 316. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(4): 381–398 http://cepa.info/1137
Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1976) Not one, not two. CoEvolutionQuart 12: 62–67 http://cepa.info/2055
Varela F. J. (1996) Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Seuil, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4): 330–350 http://cepa.info/1893
Varela F. J. (1997) The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: Searching for generative mutual constraints. Alter: Revue de Phénoménologie 5: 355–385 http://cepa.info/2013
Varela F. J. (1999) The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: J. Petitot F. J. Varela B. Pachoud & J.-M. Roy (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford: 266–314 http://cepa.info/2081
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Authors’ response: Not hagiography but ideational biography: In defense of existential enaction. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 52–58 http://constructivist.info/13/1/052
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting enaction: A dialectic between knowing and being. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 31–40 http://constructivist.info/13/1/031
Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A plea for not watering down the unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s contribution to science. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 1–10 http://constructivist.info/13/1/001
Vörös S. (2014) The uroboros of consciousness: Between the naturalisation of phenomenology and the phenomenologisation of nature. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 96–104 http://constructivist.info/10/1/096
Zahavi D. (2010) Naturalized phenomenology. In: Daniel S. & Gallagher S. (eds.) Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Springer, Berlin: 3–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (2013) Naturalized phenomenology: A desideratum or a category mistake? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 72: 23–42. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zaslawski N. (2017) “Dialectical Dance” and “Dialectical Star”: What exactly are we talking about? Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 44–46 http://constructivist.info/13/1/044

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.