Volume 2 · Number 1 · Pages 6–16
Radical Constructivism Seen with Edmund Husserl as Starting Point

Edmond Mutelesi

Download the full text in
PDF (127 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Purpose: The paper intends to investigate possible affinities between Husserlian phenomenology, mainly on the basis of Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, and radical constructivism, essentially in its version according to Maturana and Varela. Findings: Although the two thoughts appear to be delivered in terms that can be philosophically quite abstract for the Husserlian phenomenology and that are empirical-concrete for radical constructivism in Maturana’s thought, there is actually an obvious closeness between the two theories of knowledge, so that the epistemological approach used on both sides can be said to be idealistic. This idealistic orientation in epistemology certainly has its basis in the links seen on both sides between the organic and the cognitive dimension of the subject, although those links are taken as a theme in a kinesthetic approach by Husserl and in a bio-physiological one by Maturana. Neurophenomenology is nowadays one of the fields where this organic–cognitive link – which is crucial for an idealistic approach to knowledge – is being expressed. Research implications: Talking about idealism should not be a source of fear, especially when what is meant is an epistemological idealism and when it is clearly and simply understood as the philosophical and epistemological orientation that interprets the subject as determining the way the object is known in the cognitive process. Also idealism does not mean necessarily subjective idealism. Some very “balanced” authors developed a theory of knowledge that is usually seen as idealistic without ignoring the role played by the object in the cognitive process. It is therefore worth investigating further the fact that the ultimate meaning of idealistic epistemologies acknowledging intersubjectivity as a defining dimension of knowledge, is not to ignore the object but to rigorously reestablish the genesis of the object in the cognitive process.

Key words: knowledge, cognition, constitution, construction, intersubjectivity, idealism

Citation

Mutelesi E. (2006) Radical constructivism seen with edmund husserl as starting point. Constructivist Foundations 2(1): 6–16. http://constructivist.info/2/1/006

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Quale A. (2015) Religion: A Radical-Constructivist Perspective
Quale A. (2014) Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach
Quale A. (2012) On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology
Verbeke J. (2015) Designing Academic Conferences as a Learning Environment: How to Stimulate Active Learning at Academic Conferences?
Peschl M. F. (2006) Modes of Knowing and Modes of Coming to Know Knowledge Creation and Co-Construction as Socio-Epistemological Engineering in Educational Processes

References

Bateson G. (1987) Geist und Natur: Eine notwendige Einheit. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. English original: Bateson G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hejl P. M. (1987) Konstruktion der sozialen Konstruktion: Grundlinien einer konstruktivistischen Sozialtheorie. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp: Franfurt/Main: 303–339. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1931) Méditations cartésiennes. Introduction à la phénoménologie, édition française. Librairie Armand Colin, Paris. German original published in 1929. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1970) L’idée de la phénoménologie (translated by A. Lowit). P. U. F., Paris. German original published in 1907. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1972) Philosophie première. T.2. Théorie de la réduction phénoménologique. P. U. F., Paris. German original published in 1923–1924. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1973) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Part 3. Edited by I. Kern (Husserliana XV). Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kurt R. (1995) Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität. Kritik der konstruktivistischen Vernunft. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ladrière J. (1997) L'éthique dans l'univers de la rationalité. Artel-Fides: Namur. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. & Varela F. (1987) Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens. Scherz Verlag: Bern, Wien. English original published as: Maturana H. & Varela F. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. (1974) Stratégies cognitives. In: Morin E. & Piatelli-Palmarini M. (eds.) L’unité de l’homme. T.2. Le cerveau humain. Editions du Seuil, Paris: 418–442. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. (1985) Erkennen: The Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit. Ausgewählte Arbeiten zur biologischen Epistemologie (2nd edition). Vieweg, Braunschweig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. (1987) Kognition. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main: 89–118. English original published in 1978. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. (1990) The biological foundations of self consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Luhmann N., Maturana H., Namiki M., Redder V. & Varela F. (eds.) Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Fink Verlag, Munich. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. (1994) Was ist Erkennen? Piper Verlag, Munich. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mutelesi E. M. (1998) Subjectivité comme auto-organisation: Une étude du constructivisme radical au départ du Husserl de “Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität”. Dissertation at the university of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/pub/mutelesi/
Neisser U. (1979) Kognition und Wirklichkeit: Prinzipien und Implikationen der kognitiven Psychologie. Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart. English original: Neisser U. (1976) Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Römpp G. (1992) Husserls Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität und ihre Bedeutung für eine Theorie intersubjektiver Objektivität und die Konzeption einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Boston, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ricoeur P. (1986) A l’école de la phenomenologie. Vrin, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegas V. & Vetter C. (eds.) (1990) Zur Biologie der Kognition: Ein Gespräch mit Humberto Maturana und Beiträge zur Diskussion seines Werkes. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth G. (1987) Autopoiese und Kognition. Die Theorie H. R. Maturanas und die Notwendigkeit ihrer Weiterentwicklung. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Suhrkamp: Franfurt/Main: 256–286. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sandkühler H. J. (ed.) (1990) Europäische Enzyklopädie zu Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Band 4. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E., Lutz A. & Cosmelli D. (2005) Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In: Brook A. & Akins K. (eds) Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement. Cambridge University Press, New York, Cambridge. Read in Manuscript stage. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tietjen H. (1980) Fichte und Husserl: Letztbegründung, Subjektivität und praktische Vernunft im transzendentalen Idealismus. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt/Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. (1989) Autonomie et connaissance: Essai sur le vivant (transl. by P. Bourgine et P. Dumouchel). Editions du Seuil, Paris. English original published as: Varela F. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (1994) Husserl’s phenomenology of the body. Etudes Phenomenologiques 19: 63–84. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.