Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 172–180
Non-dualizing Philosophy and Empirical Research

Armin Scholl

Download the full text in
PDF (123 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Purpose: Explaining the relationship between theory and empirical research within the research process. The main motivation is to show that non-dualizing epistemology and constructivism have approximately the same ideas to explain this relationship. Problem: Josef Mitterer criticizes constructivism as a dualizing epistemology and “overlooks” that non-dualizing philosophy and constructivist perspectives are similar with regard to the relationship between theory and empirical research. Method: (1) Reconstruction of non-dualizing argumentation, (2) non-dualizing implications for the description of the relationship between theory and empirical research, (3) comparison of non-dualizing implications for the relationship between theory and empirical research with constructivist implications for this relationship. Solution: Finding a position on the description of the relationship between theory and empirical research that fits both epistemologies i.e. non-dualizing philosophy and constructivism. If we discard the critical rationalist idea to falsify theory with the help of empirical research (which reflects reality), we better conceive the relationship between theory and empirical research as a permanent and mutual refinement, stabilization and irritation. Implications: With the help of non-dualizing argumentation, constructivists have to clarify their position towards the relationship between theory and empirical research, particularly towards the choice of methods and the interpretation of the results; and non-dualizing epistemology can profit from constructivist second-order argumentation.

Key words: theory, empirical research, second-order observation, epistemology, methodology, methods

Citation

Scholl A. (2008) Non-dualizing philosophy and empirical research. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 172–180. http://constructivist.info/3/3/172

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Troadec B. (2007) Constructivism, Culture, and Cognitive Development: What Kind of Schemes for a Cultural Psychologist?
Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say
Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint
Scholl A. (2013) Exploring Luhmann’s Constructivism. Review of “Ontologien der Moderne” edited by René John et al. and of “Luhmann Handbuch” edited by Oliver Jahraus et al.
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science

References

Foerster H. von & Pörksen B. (2004) Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Gespräche für Skeptiker [Truth is a liar’s invention. Conversations for a sceptic]. 6th Edition. Carl-Auer-Systeme, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Görke A. (2006) Objekt oder Relation? Der Journalist als Personenkonstrukt: Vorschläge für eine alternative Operationalisierung journalistischer Selbstauskünfte (Object or relationship? Journalist as personal construct: Suggestions for an alternative operationalization of journalists’ self-assessment. Unpublished paper presented at the workshop on “Theory and empirical research on journalism” in Münster, Germany, 16–18 February 2006. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Loosen W., Scholl A. & Woelke J. (2002) Systemtheoretische und konstruktivistische Methodologie (System-theoretical and constructivist methodology). In: Scholl A. (ed.) Systemtheorie und Konstruktivismus in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [System theory and constructivism in communication science], UVK, Konstanz: 37–65. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft [The science of society]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1993) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip [The beyond of philosophy. Against the dualizing principle of knowledge]. 2nd Edition. Passagen, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1999) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit [The escape from arbitrariness]. Drava, Klagenfurt. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2000) Aus objektiver Distanz. Notizen zum richtigen Abstand. Für S. J. Schmidt so far and from now on [From an objective distance. Notes for the right distance. For S. J. Schmidt so far and from now on]. In: Zurstiege G. (ed.) Festschrift für die Wirklichkeit [Festschrift for reality]. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden: 243–248. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moser S. (ed.) (2004) Konstruktivistisch forschen. Methodologie, Methoden, Beispiele [Doing research in a constructivist way. Methodology, methods, examples]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pörksen B. (2006) Die Beobachtung des Beobachters. Eine Erkenntnistheorie der Journalistik [Observing the observer. An epistemology of journalism]. UVK, Konstanz. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (1994) Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung. Konstruktivistische Bemerkungen zum Zusammenhang von Kognition, Kommunikation, Medien und Kultur [Cognitive autonomy and social orientation. Constructivist remarks about the relationship between cognition, communication, media and culture]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (1998) Die Zähmung des Blicks. Konstruktivismus –Empirie –Wissenschaft [Taming of the view. Constructivism –empirical research –science]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten and Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. English translation: (2007) History & Discourses. Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholl A. (2008) Qualitative methodology. In: Donsbach W. (ed.) The international encyclopedia of communication. Vol. IX. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (UK), Malden (MA): 4053–4059. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholl A. (2008) Quantitative methodology. In: Donsbach W. (ed.) The international encyclopedia of communication. Vol. IX. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 4067–4073. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2000) Was steuert Journalismus? Ein System zwischen Selbstreferenz und Fremdsteuerung [What controls journalism? A system between self-reference and heteronomy]. UVK, Konstanz. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2001) Kommunikation über Kommunikation. Zur wechselseitigen Konstitution von Theorie, Praxis, Empirie und Method(ologi)en in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [Communication about communication. About the mutual constitution of theory, practice, empirical research and method(ology) in communication science]. In: Hug T. (ed.) Wie kommt Wissenschaft zu Wissen? Band 3: Einführung in die Methodologie der Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften [How does science attain knowledge? Volume 3: Introduction to the methodology of social science and cultural studies]. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, Baltmannsweiler: 170–179. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2005) Non-dualistische Medientheorie. Eine philosophische Grundlegung [Non-dualizing media theory. A philosophical foundation]. UVK, Konstanz. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.