Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 201–208
Looking for Consistency in Avoiding Dualisms

Ewa Binczyk

Download the full text in
PDF (119 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Purpose: The text searches for possible uses of a daring postulate to reject dualism, formulated by Josef Mitterer. Furthermore, it explores the inconsistencies of dualism and its remnants in three projects: Richard Rorty’s neopragmatism, the strong program of the sociology of knowledge, and radical constructivism. The final aim of the argument is to demonstrate that a very interesting incorporation of Mitterer’s postulates is possible, and that it must take the form of a consistent antiessentialism. At this point the article presents Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory. Findings: The article underlines the specific role of the so-called other side of the discourse – which, according to Mitterer is fabricated by the dualizing mode of speaking. Such an instance is a priori essentialized and it plays a crucial role as a tool for settling arguments. The text traces the role of this instance in the concepts mentioned above. Benefits: Through the use of Latour’s constructivism, the text indicates that there exists a fruitful empirical (non-speculative) research program, which was projected in accordance with Mitterer’s postulates.

Key words: criticism of dualism, anti-essentialism, neopragmatism, strong programme, radical constructivism, actor-network theory

Citation

Binczyk E. (2008) Looking for consistency in avoiding dualisms. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 201–208. http://constructivist.info/3/3/201

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations
Quale A. (2014) Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach
Ulrich C., Tillema E. S., Hackenberg A. J. & Norton A. (2014) Constructivist Model Building: Empirical Examples From Mathematics Education
Bednarz N. & Proulx J. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Contribution and Legacy to a Didactique des Mathématiques Research Community
Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say

References

Barnes B., Bloor D. & Henry J. (1996) Scientific knowledge. A sociological analysis. Athlone, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bińczyk E. (2005) Josefa Mitterera ucieczka od esencjalizmu. Er(r)go 10: 187–194. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bińczyk E. (2007) Obraz, który nas zniewala. Wspólczesne ujęcia języka wobec esencjalizmu i problemu referencji. Universitas, Krakow. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bloor D. (1999) Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1): 81–112. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bloor D. (1999) Reply to Bruno Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1): 131–136. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brandom R. B. (ed.) (2000) Rorty and his critics. Blackwell Publishers: Malden MA. Glasersfeld E. von (1992) Das Ende einer grossen Illusion. In: Fischer H. R., Retzer A. & Schweitzer J. (eds.) Das Ende der großen Entwürfe. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 85–98. English translation “The end of a grand illusion” retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/on 1 October 2005. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1999) For David Bloor… and beyond: A reply to David Bloor’s “Anti-Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1): 113–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (2004) Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown. In: Krohn W. & Küppers G. & Novotny H. (eds.) Selforganization. Portrait of a scientific revolution. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 64–85. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1992) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Edition Passagen, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2001) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2001) Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science 6: 1–30. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/riegler/20
Rorty R. (1995) Is truth a goal of enquiry? Davidson vs. Wright. The Philosophical Quarterly 45(180): 281–300. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shapin S. & Schaffer S. (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.