Volume 3 · Number 3 · Pages 214–220
Does Non-dualism Imply an Approach to Power? Non-dualizing Epistemology and the Political

Mathis Danelzik

Download the full text in
PDF (92 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Problem: The question of the moral and social effects of non-dualism has not yet been clarified to the necessary extent. The relation of truth claims, power and violence has been simplified; critical questions of non-dualist practises have not yet been addressed. Approach: By discussing relevant philosophy and political theory, this paper draws the attention of non-realists towards the issues of power, conflict and discourse rules and asks to rethink the issue of the pragmatic justification of non-realist epistemology. Findings: (1) Constructivists, as well as the non-dualist Josef Mitterer, are critical of the discursive effects of truth claims. Yet, neither constructivism nor non-dualism solve the power issues that are ascribed to realism by constructivists and dualism by Mitterer. Even if participants abstained from truth claims in discourses, many of the power issues would still be prevalent. (2) The question arises of whether a practical difference between non-dualism and dualism exists. (3) There is a tendency in constructivist and non-dualist theory to regard any form of influence on others as illegitimate. This tendency is not sound. Instead, the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate power is necessary in non-dualism as well. Implications: Constructivist and non-dualist theory need to scrutinise statements about the moral implications of the respective theories and to emphasise power issues not solely by extrapolating from epistemology, but by acknowledging the social dynamics of discourses and conflicts. Non-dualist social scientists could contribute to the discussion through empirical analyses of the effects of the use and the debunking of truth claims.

Key words: hegemony, power, moral, strategic essentialism, relativism, tolerance

Citation

Danelzik M. (2008) Does non-dualism imply an approach to power? Non-dualizing epistemology and the political. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 214–220. http://constructivist.info/3/3/214

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Quale A. (2008) The Issue of Reductionism. A Radical Constructivist Approach to the Philosophy of Physics
Vaz N. M. & Botelho Andrade L. A. (2017) The Epigenetic Immune Network
Quale A. (2012) On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology
Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2011) The Science Wars Go Local: The Reception of Radical Constructivism in Quebec
Larochelle M. & Désautels J. (2009) Constructivism and the “Great Divides”

References

Butler J. (2003) Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Butler J. (2006) Haß spricht. Zur Politik des Performativen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Danius S., Jonsson S. & Spivak G. C. (1993) An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Boundary 20(2): 24–50. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von & Pörksen B. (1998) Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Gepräche für Skeptiker. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2006) Entdecken oder Erfin-den.Wie lässt sich Verstehen verstehen? In: Foerster H. von (ed.) Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. Piper: München: 41–88. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hacking I. (2002) Was heißt “Soziale Konstruktion?” Zur Konjunktur einer Kampfvokabel in den Wissenschaften. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kuhn T. S. (1969) Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laclau E. (2007) Gemeinschaft und ihre Paradoxien: Richard Rortys “Liberales Utopia.” In: Laclau E. (ed.) Emanzipation und Differenz. Turia + Kant, Vienna: 150–173. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laclau E. (2007) Was haben leere Signifikanten mit Politik zu tun? In: Laclau E. (ed.) Emanzipation und Differenz. Turia + Kant, Vienna: 65–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Pörksen B. (2002) Vom Sein zum Tun. Die Ursprünge der Biologie des Erkennens. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1988) Abschied von der Wahrheit. Delfin XI: 23–29. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1992) Das Jenseits der Philosophie: Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip. Passagen, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2001) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mouffe C. (2007) Über das Politische. Wider die kosmopolitische Illusion. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Popitz H. (2004) Phänomene der Macht. Mohr, Tübingen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rorty R. (2004) Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. & Pörksen B. (2002) “Wir beginnen nie am Anfang.” In: Pörksen B. (ed.) Die Gewissheit der Ungewissheit: Gespräche zum Konstruktivismus. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg: 166–188. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Mit einem Vorwort von Mike Sanbothe. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spivak G. C. (1988) In other worlds. Essays in cultural politics. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stierlin H. & Pörksen B. (2002) “Die Freiheit, das Neue zu wagen.” In: Pörksen B. (ed.) Die Gewissheit der Ungewissheit: Gespräche zum Konstruktivismus. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg: 189–210. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2005) Non-dualistische Medientheorie. Eine philosophische Grundlegung. UVK, Konstanz. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.