Volume 4 · Number 1 · Pages 43–49
The Issue of Reductionism. A Radical Constructivist Approach to the Philosophy of Physics

Andreas Quale

Download the full text in
PDF (115 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Purpose: To examine the role of reductionism in the theoretical development of modern physics – more specifically, in the quest for a complete unification of physical theory – from the perspective of radical constructivism (RC). Approach: Some central features of the impact of RC on philosophy of physics are pointed out: its position of scientific relativism, with important implications for the validation of scientific propositions; and the notion of sharing constructed knowledge among individual knowers and its consequences for science teaching. The issue of reductionism is then discussed with regard to (a) the hierarchical explanatory ordering of physical phenomena; (b) the idea of a “theory of everything” (TOE); and (c) some of its implications for the methodology and sociology of science. Findings: It is argued that the ontological status of the hierarchical structuring inherent in the sought-after TOE will depend on the individual knower’s epistemic position concerning the notion of truth in science. In the relativist epistemology of RC, any true/false dichotomy of theories is without meaning. A hierarchical ordering is just one of many possible strategies that may be chosen for the construction of physical theories; and such a strategy may then be considered successful only to the extent that it yields a theory that is viable. Implications: The paper serves as an illustration of the impact of RC on the ongoing search in physics for a “final theory.”

Key words: final theory, epistemology, ontology, philosophy of physics, reductionism, relativism, theory of everything


Quale A. (2008) The issue of reductionism. A radical constructivist approach to the philosophy of physics. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 43–49. http://constructivist.info/4/1/043

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Quale A. (2010) Objections to Radical Constructivism
Quale A. (2007) The Epistemic Relativism of Radical Constructivism: Some Implications for Teaching the Natural Sciences
Scholl A. (2013) Exploring Luhmann’s Constructivism. Review of “Ontologien der Moderne” edited by René John et al. and of “Luhmann Handbuch” edited by Oliver Jahraus et al.
Quale A. (2012) On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science


Ariew R. (1984) The Duhem thesis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35(4): 313–325. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chew G. F. (1962) S-matrix theory of strong interactions. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Duit R., Goldberg F. & Niedderer. H. (eds.) (1992) Research in physics learning. Theoretical issues and empirical studies. IPN, Bremen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dupre J. (1994) Against scientific imperialism. PSA. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994: 374–381. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Earman J. (1992) Bayes or bust: A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feyerabend P. (1978) Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Verso, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In: Tobin K. (ed.) The practice of constructivism in science education. AAA Press, Washington DC: 23–38. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/151
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Greene B. (2000) The elegant universe. Vintage, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horgan J. (1996) The end of science. Addison-Wesley, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lange M. (2002) The philosophy of physics. Blackwell, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nagel E. (1961) The structure of science. Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nagel T. (2007) Reductionism and antireductionism. In: Bock G. R. & Goode J. A. (eds.) The limits of reductionism in biology. Wiley Interscience, Chichester: 3–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Putnam H. (1975) The nature of mental states. In: Putnam H., Mind, language and reality. Philosophical papers, Volume 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 429–440. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quale A. (2002) The role of metaphor in scientific epistemology: A constructivist perspective and consequences for science education. Science & Education 11: 443–457. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quale A. (2007) Radical constructivism and the sin of relativism. Science & Education 16: 231–266. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quale A. (2007) The epistemic relativism of radical constructivism: Some implications for teaching the natural sciences. In: Glanville R. & Riegler A. (eds.) The importance of being Ernst: Festschrift for Ernst von Glasersfeld. Edition echoraum, Vienna. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quine W. V. O. (1953) Two dogmas of empiricism. In: Quine W. V. O., From a logical point of view. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (ed.) (2001) The impact of radical constructivism on science. Foundations of Science (special issue) 6(1–4). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uebel T. (2006) Vienna circle. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle on 24 March 2008. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weinberg S. (1993) Dreams of a final theory. Random House, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Williams R. J. P. (2007) Reductionism in physical sciences. In: Bock G. R. & Goode J. A. (eds.) The limits of reductionism in biology. Wiley Interscience, Chichester: 15–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.