Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 77–83
Why Radical Constructivism Has not Become a Paradigm

Volker Gadenne

Download the full text in
PDF (254 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Problem: The paper investigates some reasons why RC has not become a mainstream endeavor. Method: The central assumptions of RC are summarized. Analysis is made of how each of these assumptions corresponds to other views, especially to intuitive beliefs that are widely accepted. Is RC consistent with these beliefs, supported by them, or incompatible with them? Results: The construction hypothesis is supported by the results of cognitive science and neurophysiology. However, the closed-system hypothesis and antirealism are in conflict with deeply rooted convictions of most people. Some ethical and educational aspects claimed by RC are generally accepted but they are not specifically implications of RC. Implications: In the near future, RC will probably not become the leading paradigm or a mainstream endeavor in the sciences or in philosophy.

Key words: closed-system hypothesis, fallibilism, intentionality, pluralism, realism, tolerance

Citation

Gadenne V. (2010) Why radical constructivism has not become a paradigm. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 77–83. http://constructivist.info/6/1/077

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Gadenne V. (2008) The Construction of Realism
Slezak P. (2010) Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite
Dykstra Jr. D. (2010) What Can We Learn from the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak’s “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”
Leydesdorff L. (2012) Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann’s Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization
Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science

References

Albert H. (1968) Traktat über kritische Vernunft. Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen. English translation: Albert H. (1985) Treatise on critical reason. Princeton University Press, Prince-ton NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Albert H. (1987) Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre. Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Devitt M. (1991) Realism and truth. University Press, Princeton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dobzhansky T. (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense, except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1973) On constructing a reality. In: Preiser F. E. (ed.) Environmental design research, Vol. 2. Dowdon, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudberg: 35–46. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 211–228. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gadenne V. (2008) The construction of realism. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 153–159. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/153.gadenne
Gergen K. (1999) An invitation to social construction. Sage, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goodman N. (1978) Ways of worldmaking. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Grossmann R. (1990) The fourth way: A theory of knowledge. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kenny V. (2007) Distinguishing Ernst von Glasersfeld’s “radical constructivism” from Humberto Maturana’s “radical realism.” Constructivist Foundations 2(2–3): 58–64. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/2/2–3/058.kenny
Kim J. (1996) Philosophy of mind. Westview Press, Boulder. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kuhn T. S. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lachman R., Lachman J. L. & Butterfield E. C. (1979) Cognitive psychology and information processing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Llinás R. R. (2001) I of the vortex. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Matthews M. R. (2000) Appraising Constructivism in science and mathematic education. In: Phillips D. C. (ed.) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago: 161–193. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. & Varela F. (1979) Autopoiesis and cognition. Reidel, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. & Varela F. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Musgrave A. (1999) Essays on realism and rationalism, Rodopi, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Neisser U. (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Neisser U. (1976) Cognition and reality. Freeman, San Francisco. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nüse R., Groeben N., Freitag B. & Schreier M. (1991) Über die Erfindung/en des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Deutscher Studien Verlag, Weinheim. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Phillips D. C. (ed.) (2000) Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Popper K. (1945) The open society and its enemies, Vol. 2. The high tide of prophecy. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Popper K. (1972) Objective knowledge. Clarendon Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quale A. (2007) Radical constructivism, and the sin of relativism. Science & Education 16: 231–266. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2005) Editorial: The constructivist challenge. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 1–8. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/001.riegler
Riegler A. (2007) Is Glasersfeld’s constructivism a dangerous intellectual tendency? In: Glanville R. & Riegler A. (eds.) The importance of being Ernst. Echoraum, Vienna: 263–275. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/riegler/46
Roth G. (1986) Selbstorganisation – Selbsterhaltung – Selbstreferentialität: Prinzipien der Organisation der Lebewesen und ihre Folgen für die Beziehung zwischen Organismus und Umwelt. In: Dress A., Hendrichs H. & Küppers G. (eds.) Selbstorganisation. Piper, München: 149–180. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Searle J. (1983) Intentionality. University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Searle J. (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, 
New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vollmer G. (1981) Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Hirzel, Stuttgart. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vollmer G. (2005) How is it that we can know this world? New arguments in evolutionary epistemology. In: Hösle V. & Illies C. (eds.) Darwinism and philosophy. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame IN: 259–274. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wendel H. J. (1990) Moderner Relativismus. Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.