Volume 6 · Number 1 · Pages 120–126
What Can We Learn from the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak’s “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”

Dewey Dykstra Jr.

Download the full text in
PDF (416 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Problem: What alternative strategies from our experiences using a Piaget-based radical constructivist pedagogy might have more and better results than the current practice of responding in debate form, each side trying to prove the other wrong? Method: Use of Slezak’s paper to illuminate the point that the central problem with the interpretation of RC generally used in such writing is that the authors seem not to be able to operate from the central tenet of RC, which is the opposite of that used in realism. Description of how this failure to use the central tenet of RC results in claims that RC is irrelevant to education and to definitions of good teaching. Results: A specific approach shown to be useful in facilitating the construction of new understanding in science is adapted in order to guide interaction between an RC and a realist, which can result in the realist understanding the RC point of view. Implications: Instead of debating with critics of RC, where each side is trying to prove the other side wrong, we need to change the interaction to one in which members of opposing sides attempt to understand the other’s position. In this situation we are in a position to use a pedagogical strategy in which the realist examines her own fundamental assumption that we can know a mind-independent world, and considers the implications of a starting assumption that is exactly the opposite.

Key words: realism, good teaching, solipsism, disequilibration, folk theory teaching

Citation

Dykstra Jr. D. (2010) What can we learn from the misunderstandings of radical constructivism? Commentary on slezak’s “radical constructivism: Epistemology, education and dynamite”. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 120–126. http://constructivist.info/6/1/120

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Dykstra Jr. D. (2007) The Challenge of Understanding Radical Constructivism
Quale A. (2010) Objections to Radical Constructivism
Dykstra Jr. D. (2005) Against Realist Instruction
Dykstra Jr. D. (2010) Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is not an Easy One
Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science

References

de la Torre A. C. & Zamorano R. (2001) Answer to question #31. Does any piece of mathematics exist for which there is no application whatsoever in physics? American Journal of Physics 69(2): 103. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dykstra D. I. Jr. (2005) Against realist instruction: Superficial success masking catastrophic failure and an alternative. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 49–60. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/049.dykstra
Dykstra D. I. Jr. (2007) The challenge of understanding radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 2(2–3): 50–57. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/2/2–3/050.dykstra
Gardner H. (1991) The unschooled mind. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1984) Introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) A constructivist approach to teaching. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 3–15. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nola R. (1998) Constructivism in science and science education: A philosophical critique. In: Matthews M. R. (ed.) Constructivism in science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 31–59. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Planck M. (1932) Where is science going? W. W. Norton & Co, New York. Reprinted in 1981 by Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge CT. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Quine W. V. (1961) Identity, ostension, and hypostasis. In: Quine W. V., From a logical point of view. Harper, New York: 65–79. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Slezak P. (2010) Radical constructivism: Epistemology, education and dynamite. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 102–111. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/102.slezak
Steffe L. (2010) Consequences of rejecting constructivism: “Hold tight and pedal fast”. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 112–119. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/6/1/112.steffe
Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) (1995) Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thornton R. K. & Sokoloff D. R. (1998) Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics 66: 338–352. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.