Volume 6 · Number 3 · Pages 370–380
The Bioethical Dimension of Maturana’s Thought

Rossella Mascolo

Download the full text in
PDF (329 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: Introduced in 1970, bioethics is now more and more commonly used since it applies to a variety of concepts belonging to traditional Western thought. Just like other dualisms that are typical of traditional Western thought (e.g., mind/body, subject/object, philosophy/science), bioethics is developing in areas that are mostly isolated from each other, with each argument restricted to its specific space, without affecting the general concept of bioethics. It is also characterized by the dualism ought/being. Purpose: I maintain that the definition of a relevant moral criterion should include the whole scope of thinking and the whole adopted perspective. Consequently, the current conception of bioethics should be changed. Such an alternative view objects to the fragmentation of knowledge. In this way, specifically in bioethics, our way of living and life itself acquire an ethical dimension. Maturana’s theory is expected to be a useful instrument for dealing with the difficulties that the concept of “bioethics” brings. Method: First, traditional bioethics and its way of dealing with some of its typical problems are discussed. Then, Maturana’s epistemology, including his emphasis on the observer, his biology of cognition located in “languaging,” and his ethics of love are described. Its features, such as trust and respect, will be highlighted, taking into account his modality of speaking as a biologist, exposed to the risk of “naturalistic fallacy” but dispelling it thanks to – I argue – the radical difference between Maturana’s theory and the traditional Western epistemology. Results: Maturana’s definition of ethics leads to the conclusion that the whole of living is ethics, the whole of life is ethics, and there is no separation existing between the “ought” and the “being.” Bioethics, and also ethics, dissolve themselves in the circularity of the living, which operates in the living-acting of each human being in the systemic texture they belong to and which they contribute to creating in an open-ended process of “languaging.”

Key words: bioethics, ethics, post-Cartesian theory of knowledge, love, facts/values, ought/being, naturalistic fallacy, autopoiesis, traditional Western thought, observer

Citation

Mascolo R. (2011) The bioethical dimension of maturana’s thought. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 370–380. http://constructivist.info/6/3/370

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Maturana H. R., Bitbol M. & Luisi P. L. (2012) The Transcendence of the Observer. Discussions at the Conference “The Ethical Meaning of Francisco Varela’s Thought”
Kauffman L. H. (2017) Mathematical Work of Francisco Varela
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2012) Observing Environments
Riegler A. & Scholl A. (2012) Niklas Luhmann and the Sociological Turn in Constructivism
Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms

References

Bohm D. (1980) Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bunnell P. (2005) Reflections on the ontology of observing. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 11(4): 72–84. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Bartolomeo M. & Magni V. (2001) Filosofia. Filosofie contemporanee. Tomo 5. Atlas, Bergamo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1989) Can ethics take pluralism seriously? The Hastings Center Report 19(5): 33–34. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1989) Fashioning an ethic for life and death in a post-modern society. The Hastings Center Report 19(1): 7–9. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1991) Manuale di bioetica. Il Saggiatore, Milano. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1992) The search for a universal system of ethics: post-modern disappointments and contemporary possibilities. In Kjellstrand C. M. & Dossetor J. B. (eds.) Ethical problems in dialysis and transplantation. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 3–20. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1996) Bioethics reconsidered: Theory and method in a post-Christian, post-modern age. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6(4): 336–341. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhardt H. T. Jr. (1999) Bioethics in the third millennium: Some critical anticipations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9(3): 225–243. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feyerabend P. (1975) Against method. Verso, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feyerabend P. K. (1999) Knowledge, science and relativism. Philosophical Papers Volume 3. Edited by John Preston. Cambridge University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fleischaker G. R. (1984) The traditional model for perception and theory of knowledge: Its metaphor and two recent alternatives. Behavioral Science 29(1) 40–50. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Distinguishing the observer: An attempt at interpreting Maturana. Methodologia V(8): 57–68. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/125.2
Lévy P. (2002) L’intelligenza collettiva. Per un’antropologia del cyberspazio. Feltrinelli, Milano. French original: Lévy P. (1994) L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace. La Découverte, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lecaldano E. (2002) Dizionario di bioetica. Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mascolo R. (2011) L’emergere della biologia della cognizione. La complessità della vita di Humberto Maturana Romecín. Aracne Editrice, Roma. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mascolo R. (in preparation) Dalla biologia della cognizione all’autopoiesi. Fra R. Maturana e Francisco J. Varela. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Poerksen B. (2004) From being to doing. Carl-Auer Verlag, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1988) The tree of knowledge. Shambhala, Boston and London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller G. (2008) The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Edited by Pille Bunnell. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1970) Biology of cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory BCL Report Nº 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana IL. Reprinted in: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Boston: 1–58. Pagination follows the reprint. http://www.enolagaia.com/UMUArchive/M70–80BoC.html
Maturana H. R. (1970) Neurophysiology of cognition. In: Garvin P. (ed.) Cognition: A multiple view. Spartan Books, New York: 3–23. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1978) Cognition. In: Hejl P., Koch W. & Roth G. (eds.) Wahrnehmung und Kommunikation. Peter Lang, Frankfurt: 29–49. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1983) What is it to see? Archivos de biologia y medicina experimentales 16: 255–269. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25–82. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/papers/maturana/88-reality.html.
Maturana H. R. (2006) Emozioni e linguaggio in educazione e politica. Con Dávila Ximena. Editore Eleuthera, Milano. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mori M. (2003) Il linguaggio della bioetica. Lessico e argomentazioni in un recente “Dizionario.” Iride XVI(40): 543–553. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pagano P. (2003) La filosofia ambientale come interazione dialettica tra scienze umane e scienze naturali. Systema Naturae 5: 193–217. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pagano P. (2006) Filosofia ambientale [Environmental philosophy]. Mattioli 1885 Editore, Fidenza. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pellegrino E. D. (1975) Moral agency and professional ethics: Some notes on transformation of the physician-patient encounter. In: Spicker S. F. & Engelhardt H. T. (eds.) Philosophical medical ethics, its nature and significance: Proceedings of the third trans-disciplinary symposium on philosophy and medicine. Reidel, Dordrecht: 213–220. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Poerksen B. (2004) The certainty of uncertainty: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Potter V. R. (1971) Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Potter V. R. (1988) Global bioethics: Building on the Leopold legacy. MSU Press, East Lansing MI. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Potter V. R. (1996) What does bioethics mean? The Ag Bioethics Forum 8(1): 2–3. http://www.bioethics.iastate.edu/forum/jun.96pg2.html and http://www.bioethics.iastate.edu/forum/jun.96pg3.html
Potter V. R. (1999) Bioethics, biology and the biosphere. The Hastings Center Report 29(1): 38. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2005) Editorial. The constructivist challenge. Constructivist Foundation 1(1): 1–8. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/001.riegler
Tallacchini M. & Terragni F. (2004) Le biotecnologie. Aspetti etici, sociali e ambientali. Bruno Mondadori, MilanoThompson W. I. (ed.) (1987) Gaia: A way of knowing. Lindisfarne Press, Hudson NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1981) Autonomy and autopoiesis. In Roth G. & Schwegler H. (eds.) Self-organizing Systems. Springer, New York: 14–23. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1987) Laying down a path in walking: A biologist’s look at a new biology. In: Thompson W. I. (ed.) Gaia: A way of knowing. Lindisfarne Press, Hudson NY: 48–64. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1999) Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.