Volume 8 · Number 2 · Pages 190–201
From Descriptions to Prehensions: Mate-R-ealizing Mitterer with Whitehead

Carsten Ochs

Download the full text in
PDF (529 kB) · EPUB (97 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: In recent years, the debates surrounding radical constructivism have increasingly paid attention to the problematic dualist logic of radical constructivism as well as that of realism. Mitterer’s non-dualism is an attempt to overcome such approaches. Problem: Although Mitterer succeeds in identifying the flaws of dualism, he takes a reductionist position that does not account for materiality and is therefore not convincing when it comes to describing epistemic processes appropriately. Method: Having identified the conceptual problematic to be found in Mitterer, I introduce Whithead’s basic framework as an alternative non-dualistic approach. I argue that starting from Whitehead’s notion of “prehension” allows for more appropriate accounts of epistemic processes. Results: By following this train of thought, it is possible to develop a position that is non-dualist, realist, and constructivist at the same time. Implications: The article demonstrates the need to develop process theoretical approaches to epistemology and contributes to developing an epistemologically relaxed way of arguing, as was recently called for. This implies the requirement of developing a radical process constructivism that integrates concepts such as performativity and enactment.

Key words: Words-world distinction, description, prehension, constructivism, realism, multiple ontologies

Citation

Ochs C. (2013) From descriptions to prehensions: Mate-r-ealizing mitterer with whitehead. Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 190–201. http://constructivist.info/8/2/190

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Gadenne V. (2008) The Construction of Realism
Weber S. (2008) The Object of Description is the Description of the Object So Far: Non-dualism and Beyond
Hoffjann O. (2013) Public Relations: Between Omnipotence and Impotence
Saalmann G. (2007) Arguments Opposing the Radicalism of Radical Constructivism
Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations

References

Abriszewski K. (2008) Notes towards uniting actor-network theory and Josef Mitterer’s non-dualizing philosophy. Constructivist Foundations (3)3: 192–200. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/192.abriszewski
Akrich M., Callon M. & Latour B. (2002): The key to success in innovation Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management (6)2: 207–225. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Callon M. (2007): What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In: MacKenzie D., Muniesa F. & Siu L. (eds.) Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 311–357. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Debaise D. (2006): Un empirisme speculative. Lecture de procès et réalité de Whitehead. Vrin, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gadenne V. (2008) The construction of realism. Constructivist Foundations (3)3: 153–159. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/153.gadenne
Halewood M. & Michael M. (2008) Being a sociologist and becoming a Whiteheadian. Toward a concrescent methodology. Theory, Culture & Society (25)4: 31–56. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Halewood M. (2005) A. N. Whitehead, information and social Theory. Theory, Culture & Society (22)6: 73–94. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1991) Technology is society made durable. In: Law J. (ed.) A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge, London: 103–131. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1996) Do scientific objects have a history? Pasteur and Whitehead in a bath of lactic acid. Common Knowledge (5)1: 76–91. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (2007) A textbook case revisited: knowledge as a mode of existence. In: Hackett E. J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M. E. & Wajcman J. (eds.) The handbook of science and technology studies. Third edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 83–112. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (2008) What is the style of matters of concern? Van Gorcum, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (1992) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip [The beyond of philosophy: Against the dualistic principle of cognition]. Passagen, Vienna. Republished, with a new afterword, in 2011 by Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2001) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit [The flight from contingency]. S. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main. Republished, with a new foreword, in 2011 by Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2013) “On interpretation.” Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 143–147. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/2/143.mitterer. German original: “Über Interpretation.” In: Riegler A. & Weber S. (eds.) (2010) Die Dritte Philosophie. Velbrück, Weilerswist: 286–296.
Mol A. (2002) The body multiple. Ontology in medical practice. Duke Univ. Press, Durham. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. & Weber S. (eds.) (2010) Die dritte Philosophie. Kritische Beiträge zu Joseph Mitterers Non-Dualismus [The third philosophy: critical contributions to Josef Mitterer’s non-dualism] Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rorty R. (1991) Das subjektivistische Prinzip und die Wende zur Sprachanalyse. In: Hampe M. & Maaßen H. (eds.) Die Gifford Lectures und ihre Deutung. Materialien zu Whiteheads “Prozeß und Realität” 2. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 276–312. Originally published as: Rorty R. (1979) The subjectivist principle and the linguistic turn. In: Kline G. L. (ed.) Alfred North Whitehead. Essays on his philosophy. University Press of America, Lanham MD: 134–157. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbeck bei Hamburg. English translation: Schmidt S. J. (2007) Histories and discourses. Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2010) Die Endgültigkeit der Vorläufigkeit. Prozessualität als Argumentationsstrategie [The definitiveness of preliminariness. Processuality as a way of arguing]. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stengers I. (2011) Thinking with Whitehead. A free and wild creation of concepts. Translated by Michael Case, with a foreword by Bruno Latour. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Originally published in French as: Stengers I. (2002) Penser avec Whitehead. Une libre et sauvage création des concepts. Éditions de Seuil, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2008) The object of description is the description of the object so far: Non-dualism and beyond. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 140–147. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/3/3/140.weber
Whitehead A. N. (1954) Science and the modern world. Fifth reprint. The New American Library, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Whitehead A. N. (1979) Process and reality. An essay in cosmology. Edited by David R. Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. The Free Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.