Volume 8 · Number 3 · Pages 280-287
An Experiential Phenomenology of Novelty: The Dynamic Antinomy of Attention and Surprise

Natalie Depraz

Download the full text in
PDF (771 kB) · EPUB (49 kB) · MOBI (73 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: In earlier joint work with Varela and Vermersch, we began the elaboration of a methodological and epistemological framework for a practical experiential phenomenology. Problem: I here wish to update and further develop that earlier work. Method: I present the framework of a practical, as distinct from a conceptual-theoretical, phenomenology. I update that framework, arguing for a shift in emphasis from consciousness to vigilant attention. I offer a still preliminary investigation of the important phenomenon of surprise. I link these results with ongoing scientific research conducted by myself and others. Results: Attention-as-vigilance is a key operator of experience. Attention has an antinomic dynamic with surprise. Implications: Attention and surprise are key participants in the generative process of the experience of novelty. Elaboration of this thesis enables the further development of practical, first-person methodologies. Constructivist content: This paper outlines certain key features of first-person, lived experience, and elaborates a method for linking these results directly to ongoing scientific research.

Key words: Practical phenomenology, attention, vigilance, surprise, experience, novelty

Citation

Depraz N. (2013) An experiential phenomenology of novelty: The dynamic antinomy of attention and surprise. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 280-287. http://constructivist.info/8/3/280

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Parini P. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld and the Italian Operational School: Didactic Implications of Operational Awareness
Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being
Froese T., Gould C. & Barrett A. (2011) Re-Viewing from Within: A Commentary on First- and Second-Person Methods in the Science of Consciousness
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty Years Constructivism

References

Bergson H. (2009) La conscience et la vie. In: L’énergie spirituelle. Essais et conférences. PUF, Paris. Originally published in 1919. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2001) Lucidité du corps. De l’empirisme transcendantal en phénoménologie, Kluwer, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2008) Lire Husserl en phénoménologue. Idées directrices pour une phenomenology (I). PUF-CNED, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2008) The rainbow of emotions. At the crossroads between phenomenology and neurobiology. Continental Philosophy Research 41(2): 237–259. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2009) Plus sur Husserl: Une phénoménologie expérientielle. Altande, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2009) The “failing” of meaning. In: Petitmengin C. (ed.) Ten years of viewing from within. The legacy of Francisco Varela. Imprint Academic, Exeter: 90–117. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2013) Attention et vigilance. A la croisée de la phénoménologie et des sciences cognitives. PUF Epiméthée, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2013) L’éclair me dure: Une phénoménologie expérientielle de la surprise. In: Depraz N. (ed.) Proceedings of “Surprise à la croisée de la phénoménologie, de la psychiatrie et de la pragmatique,” 21–22 March 2013, University of Rouen/ENS-CNRS-Archives-Husserl. Video recording available at http://www.univ-rouen.fr/audio/2010/index.php?vid=337 ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2013) Paul Ricœur and the praxis of the phenomenology : Ideas I. In: Embree L. & Nenon T. (eds.) Husserl’s Ideen. Springer, Dordrecht: 383–398. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N. (2013) Qu’est-ce qu’une phénoménologie en première personne? Premiers pas vers une Lecture et une Ecriture expérientielles (LEE). In: Depraz N. (ed.) Proceedings of the conference “Première, deuxième, troisième personne.” Presses Universitaires de Rouen, Rouen. English version: Consciousness and first person phenomenology. First steps towards an experiential phenomenological reading and writing (ERW). In: Menon S. (ed.) Proceedings of the international conference “Looking within: Interdisciplinary approaches to consciousness,” 5–7 January 2012, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, Chapter 11. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N., Varela F. J. & Vermersch P. (2003) On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. Benjamins Press: Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Elkaïm M. (1989) Si tu m’aimes, ne m’aime pas. Seuil, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1970) Expérience et jugement. PUF, Paris. Originally published in 1938. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1999) De la synthèse passive. J. Millon, Grenoble. Originally published in 1918–1926. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (2001) Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. Translated by Anthony J. Steinbock. Collective Works Volume 9. Kluwer, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Peirce C. S. (1994) CP: The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic edition reproducing Past Masters. Hartshorne C. & Weiss P. (eds.) (1931–1935) Vols. I–VI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; Burks A. (ed.) (1958) Vols. VII–VIII. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Intelex Corporation, Charlottesville. Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (ed.) (2009) Ten years of viewing from within. The legacy of Francisco Varela. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (ed.) (2011) Ten years of viewing from within: Further debate. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18(2). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Saint Augustin (1993) Confessions. Flammarion, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Smith A. (1962) Lectures on astronomy. In: The Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence. Volume 3: Essays on philosophical subjects. Edited by J. Bryce. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis. Originally published in 1795. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. & Depraz N. (1999) At the source of time. Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. In: Gallagher S., Watson S., Brun P. & Romanski P. (eds.) Ipseity and alterity. Presses Universitaires de Rouen, Rouen: 153–154. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1999) The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J.-M. Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford: 266–317. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (1994) L’entretien d’explicitation. Fourth augmented edition. ESF, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2012) Explicitation et phenomenology. PUF, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weil S. (1966) Attente de dieu. Fayard, Paris. Originally published in 1942. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.