Constructivist Foundations (CF) is an international peer-reviewed e-journal focusing on the multidisciplinary study of the philosophical and scientific foundations and applications of constructivism and related disciplines. The journal promotes interdisciplinary discussion and cooperation among researchers and theorists working in a great number of diverse fields such as: Artificial Intelligence · Biology · Cognitive Science · Communication Science · Computer Science · Educational Research · Ethics · Linguistics · Mathematics · Media Studies · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychotherapy · Sociology.
Constructivist approaches covered in the journal include:
4E Cognition · Autopoietic Systems · Biology of Cognition · Constructionism · Enaction/Enactivism · First-Person Research · Neurophenomenology · Non-Dualizing Philosophy · Operative Constructivism · Personal Construct Psychology · Radical Constructivism · Second-Order Cybernetics.
Constructivist Foundations appears three times a year and is available free of charge to its registered readers. Papers are published in an appealing format ready to be printed by the reader. Even though the journal is predominantly distributed electronically our policy is to never change the content after publication to allow for reliable citations in terms of volume, number, and page. The URLs of article pages are permanent and short, following the general format http://constructivist.info/volume/number/page
Indexing and Ranking
Constructivist Foundations (ISSN: 1782-348X) is listed in:
- Web of Science’s Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI)
- Scimago Journal & Country Rank
- Scopus CiteScore 2019: 1.6
- European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Science (ERIH PLUS), Philosophy
- EBSCO’s Education Research Complete.
- The Philosopher’s Index
- Journal Impact Factor 2018: 2.31 (Source: Resurchify)
Aims and Scope
Constructivist approaches support the idea that mental structures such as cognition and perception are actively built by one’s mind rather than passively acquired. However, constructivist approaches vary in function of how much influence they attribute to constructions.
Many assume a dualistic relationship between reality and constructed elements. They maintain that constructed mental structures gradually adapt to the structures of the real world (e.g., Piaget). In this view perception is the pickup of information controlled by the mental structure that is constructed from earlier perceptions (e.g., Neisser). This leads to the claim that mental structures are about learning sensorimotor contingencies (e.g., O’Regan).
Others seek to avoid the dualistic position. Either they skeptically reject that the structures of the real world can be compared with mental ones, independently of the senses through which the mental structures were constructed in the first place (e.g., von Glasersfeld), or they embrace a phenomenological perspective that considers perception as the grouping of experiential complexes (e.g., Mach).
All these approaches emphasize the primacy of the cognitive system (e.g., Llinás) and its organizational closure (e.g., von Foerster, Maturana). Hence, perceived patterns and regularities may be regarded as invariants of inborn cognitive operators (e.g., Diettrich).
Constructivist approaches can be said to differ also with respect to whether constructs are considered to populate the rational-linguistic (e.g., von Glasersfeld, Schmidt) or the biological-bodily (“enactivist/embodied” theories, e.g., Varela).