Karl H. Müller & Alexander Riegler
Log in to download the full text for free
Abstract
Context: The journal Constructivist Foundations celebrates ten years of publishing articles on constructivist approaches, in particular radical constructivism. Problem: In order to preserve the sustainability of radical constructivism and regain its appeal to new generations of researchers, we set up a new course of action for and with the radical constructivist community to study its innovative potential. This new avenue is “second-order science.” Method: We specify two motivations of second-order science, i.e., the inclusion of the observer, and self-reflexivity that allows second-order science to operate on the products of normal or first-order science. Also, we present a short overview of the contributions that we have collected for this inaugural issue on second-order science. Results: These six initial contributions demonstrate the potential of the new set of approaches to second-order science across several disciplines. Implications: Second-order science is believed to be a cogent concept in the evolution of science, leading to a new wave of innovations, novel experiments and a much closer relationship with current research in the cognitive neurosciences in particular, and with evolutionary and complexity theories in general.
Key words: Radical constructivism, second-order science, observer, self-reflexivity
Citation
Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2014) A new course of action. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 1–6. http://constructivist.info/10/1/001
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Comments: 2
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
Comment by Bruce Kodish · 15 Nov 2014 | |
Is the world finally catching up with Korzybski who wrote in 1922: "“… all that man can know is a joint phenomenon of the observer and the observed.â€â€¦for science and life, logic is as vital a factor as “facts†because, for human knowledge, there are no “facts†free from the share of the observer’s mind… if there is such a thing as general knowledge, its foundation must be found outside of gross empiricism. Most probably such a thing does exist and its origin may be traced to the constitution of the human mind itself – to sound modern logic (mathematics).†http://korzybskifiles.blogspot.com/2014/10/chapter-25-brotherhood-of-doctrines_24.html |
Comment by Richard Stafford · 15 Nov 2014 | |
I would hope that anyone interested in “A New Course of Action†would take the trouble to at least look at my publication “The Foundations of Physical Realityâ€. A free PDF copy may be found on Anssi Hyytiainen’s blog site, http://foundationsofphysics.blogspot.com |