The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms
Hugo Cadenas & Marcelo Arnold-Cathalifaud
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Although the theory of autopoietic systems was originally formulated to explain the phenomenon of life from an operational and temporal perspective, sociologist Niklas Luhmann incorporated it later within his theory of social systems. Due to this adoption, there have been several discussions regarding the applicability of this concept beyond its biological origins. Problem: This article addresses the conception of Luhman’s autopoietic social systems, and confronts this vision with criticism both of the original authors of the concept of autopoiesis and of other social theorists in order to elucidate the main problems of this debate and its possible solutions. Method: The objectives of the article are reached by means of a theoretical reconstruction of the main issues of the debate on the concept of autopoiesis. The main method used for the research is the use of documentary sources to discuss the arguments. Results: We claim that it is justified to extend the concept of autopoiesis from its biological origin to other disciplines, and to develop its interdisciplinary character, following the spirit of systems theory and constructivism. Implications: Our results are useful for promoting the development of new interdisciplinary research in the field of systems theory and constructivism. Important changes to practice should be made, namely, the development of new research methods, new concepts and perspectives. Constructivist content: The concept of autopoiesis is one of the fundamental concepts of the constructivist epistemology. The discussion proposes a radical understanding of this concept in order to realize all its explanatory potential.
Key words: Biological autopoiesis, social autopoiesis, systems theory, Niklas Luhmann.
Citation
Cadenas H. & Arnold-Cathalifaud M. (2015) The autopoiesis of social systems and its criticisms. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 169–176. http://constructivist.info/10/2/169
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Antweiler C. (2009) Was ist den Menschen gemeinsam? Über Kultur und Kulturen [What have humans in common? On culture and cultures]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt. Second edition. Originally published in 2007.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Araos C. (2006) The musical work as a point of view. Systemic analysis of “contemporary music.” In: Farías I. & Ossandón J. (eds.) Observando sistemas: Nuevas apropiaciones y usos de la teoría de Niklas Luhmann. RIL Editores, Santiago de Chile: 119–148.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Arnold M. & Cadenas H. (2013) Imágenes de la complejidad: La sociopoiesis de la economía moderna [Images of complexity: The sociopoiesis of the modern economy]. Revista Mad 29: i–xiii.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baecker D. (2008) Womit handeln Banken? Eine Untersuchung zur Risikoverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft [What do banks trade in? A study on risk management in the economy]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer S. (1980) Preface to “autopoiesis.” In: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J., Autopoiesis and cognition:. Reidel, Dordrecht: 63–72.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Benseler F., Hejl P. M. & Köck W. K. (eds.) (1980) Autopoiesis, communication, and society. The theory of autopoietic systems in the social sciences. Campus, Frankfurt am Main.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bertalanffy L. von (1950) An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1(2): 134–165.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beyer P. (1985) The mission of Quebec ultramontanism: A Luhmannian perspective. Sociological Analysis 46(1): 37–48.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beyer P. (1997) Religion, residual problems, and functional differentiation: An ambiguous relationship. Soziale Systeme 3(2): 219–235.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buckley W. (1967) Sociology and modern systems theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Byrne R. W. & Whiten A. (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian intelligence. Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Berg H. (2001) Luhmanns systems theory and its applications in literary studies: A bibliography. European Journal of English Studies 5(3): 385–436.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Marinis P. (2008) Max Weber: La disputada herencia de un clásico de la sociología. Entrevistas a Wolfgang Schluchter y Dirk Käsler [Max Weber: The disputed legacy of a classical sociologist. Interviews with Wolfgang Schluchter and Dirk Käsler]. Reis 121: 169–204.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dupuy J.-P. (1985) L’essor de la première cybernétique (1943–1953) Histoires de cybernétique. C. R.E. A. Cahier Nr. 7. École Polytechnique, Paris: 7–139.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Durkheim E. (1893) De la division du travail social. Felix Alcan Editeur, Paris. [English Trad. The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press, New York, 1997].
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eldridge D. (2002) The construction of a courtroom. The judicial system and autopoiesis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 38(3): 298–316.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Esposito E. (2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society.Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham/Massachusetts.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Esteves-Vasconcellos M. (2013) A nova teoria geral dos sistemas: Dos sistemas autopoiéticos aos sistemas sociais [The new general systems theory: From autopoietic systems to social systems]. Ed. VortoBooks, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Esteves-Vasconcellos M. (2014) Não ensine a pescar! Sobre a fundamentação teórica das práticas sistêmicas [Don’t teach fishing! About the theoretical foundations of systemic practices]. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica XXIII(50): 51–73.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1973) On constructing a reality. In: Preiser F. E. (ed.) Environmental design research. Volume 2. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg: 35–46.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goffman E. (1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Habermas J. (1987) The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system. A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press, Boston.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Habermas J. (1996) Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hahn A. (1987) Religion und Welt in der französischen Gegenreformation [Religion and World in the French Counter-Reformation]. In: Baecker D., Markowitz J., Stichweh R., Tyrell H. & Willke H. (eds.) Theorie als Passion: Niklas Luhmann zum 60. Geburtstag. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 84–106.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heims S. J. (1985) An encounter between neo-mechanists and the human sciences. Histoires des cybernétique. C. R.E. A. Cahier Nr. 7. École Polytechnique, Paris: 141–202.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hejl P. M. & Stahl H. K. (2000) Management und Selbstregelung [Management and self-regulation]. In: Hejl P. M. & Stahl H. K. (eds.) Management und Wirklichkeit. Das Konstruieren von Unternehmen, Märkten und Zukünften [Management and reality. Constructing enterprises, markets, and futures]. Carl-Auer, Heidelberg: 100–138.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hejl P. M. (1995) Autopoiesis or co-evolution? Reconceptualizing the relation between individuals and societies. Paragrana 4(2): 294–314.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hejl P. M. (1997) Communication and social systems: Evolutionary and developmental aspects. In: Weingart P., Mitchell S. D., Richerson P. J. & Maasen S. (eds.) Human by nature. Between biology and the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ: 407–421.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
In: De Vries U. & Francot L. (eds.) Law’s environment: Critical legal perspectives. Eleven International Publishers, Den Haag: 45–62.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jameson F. (2002) A singular modernity. Essay on the ontology of the present. Verso, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Knorr-Cetina K. (1992) Zur Unterkomplexität der Differenzierungstheorie. Empirische Anfragen an die Systemtheorie [On the undercomplexity of the theory of differentiation. Empirical inquiries into systems theory]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 21(6): 406–419.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ladeur K.-H. (1999) The theory of autopoiesis as an approach to a better understanding of postmodern law. From the hierarchy of norms to the heterarchy of changing patterns of legal inter-relationships. Working Paper 99/3. European University Institute Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leduc S. (1912) La biologie synthétique, étude de biophysique. A. Poinat, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lehmann H. (2006) Die flüchtige Wahrheit der Kunst. Ästhetik nach Luhmann [The volatile truth of art. Aesthetics by Luhmann]. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Munich.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lockwood D. (1964) Social integration and system integration. In: Zollschan G. & Hirsch W. (eds.) Explorations in social change. Houghton Mifflin, Boston: 370–383.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1974) Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie [Functional method and systems theory]. In: Luhmann N., Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen: 31–53.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1981) Theoretische Orientierung der Politik. Vortrag auf dem Convegno Sapere e Potere Genua, November 1980 [Theoretical orientation of politics. Paper presented at the Convegno Sapere e Potere Genua, November 1980]. In: Luhmann N., Soziologische Aufklärung, Band 3. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen: 287–292.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1981) Vorbemerkungen zu einer Theorie sozialer Systeme [Preliminary remarks to a theory of social systems]. In: Luhmann N., Soziologische Aufklärung 3: Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen: 11–24.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1982) Autopoiesis, Handlung und kommunikative Verständigung [Autopoiesis, action and communicative understanding]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 11(4): 366–379.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1982) Interaction, organization, and society. In: Luhmann N., The Differentiation of Society. Columbia University Press, New York: 69–89.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1982) The self-thematization of society. In: Luhmann N., The differentiation of society. Columbia University Press, New York: 324–362.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1985) Die Autopoiesis des Bewußtseins [The autopoiesis of consciousness]. Soziale Welt 36: 402–446. Reprinted in: Hahn A. & Kapp V. (eds.) Selbstthematisierung und Selbstzeugnis: Bekenntnis und Geständnis. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 25–94.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F. & van der Zouwen J. (eds.) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. Sage, London: 172–192.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1987) Modern systems theory and the theory of society. In: Meja V., Misgeld D. & Stehr N. (eds.) Modern German Sociology. Columbia University Press, New York: 173–186.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1993) Deconstruction as second-order observing. New Literary History 24: 763–782. Reproduced in: Luhmann N. (2002) Theories of distinction. Stanford University Press: 94–112.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1996) On the scientific context of the concept of communication. Collected papers on Niklas Luhmann. Social Science Information. Sage, London 35 (2): 257–267.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1997) Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society? International Review of Sociology 7(1): 67–79.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (2002) Einführung in die Systemtheorie [Introduction to systems theory]. Carl-Auer Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1975) Autopoietic systems: A characterization of the living organization. Biological Computer Lab (BCL) Research Report 9.4. University of Illinois, Urbana. Republished as the second section in: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis: The organization of the living. Reidel, Boston: 63–134.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1970) Biology of cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory BCL report N. 9.0, University of Illinois. Reprinted in: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht: 5–58.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Miller G. A. & Lenneberg E. (1978) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1991) Comentario manuscrito (no publicado) al libro: Sociedad y teoría de sistemas de Darío Rodríguez y Marcelo Arnold [Manuscript Review (unpublished) to the book: Society and systems theory of Darío Rodríguez and Marcelo Arnold]. In: Luhmann N. (1996) Introducción a la teoría de sistemas. Universidad Iberoamericana, ITESO, Anthropos, México DF: 93.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R., Uribe G. & Frenk S. (1968) A biological theory of relativistic colour coding in the primate retina: A discussion of nervous system closure with reference to certain visual effects. Archiva de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales Suplemento 1: 1–30.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merton R. K. (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Journal of Sociology 1(6): 894–904.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merton R. K. (1949) Social theory and social structure. The Free Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mingers J. (2002) Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s social theory. The Sociological Review 50(2): 278–299.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Murdock G. P. (1945) The common denominator of cultures. In: Linton R. (ed.) The science of man in the world crisis. Columbia University Press, New York: 123–142.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nacke S. (2010) Die Kirche der Weltgesellschaft. Das II. Vatikanische Konzil und die Globalisierung des Katholizismus [The church of world society. The second Vatican council and the globalization of Catholicism]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nassehi A. (2011) Kunst im System. In: Gesellschaft der Gegenwarten. Studien zur Theorie der modernen Gesellschaft II [Art in system]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 310–336.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Neves M. (1992) Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: Eine theoretische Betrachtung und eine Interpretation des Falls Brasiliens [Constitution and positivity of law in the modern peripheries. Theoretical remarks and an interpretation of the Brazilian case]. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. & Shils E. A. (eds.) (1962) Toward a general theory of action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T. (1961) An outline on the social system. In: Parsons T., Shils E., Naegele K. D. & Pitts J. R. (eds.) Theories of society. Volume 1. The Free Press, Glencoe IL: 30–79.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parsons T., Bales R. F. & Shils E. A. (1953) Working papers in the theory of action. The Free Press, New York/London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pask G. (1978) A conversation: Theoretic approach to social systems. In: Geyer F. & van der Zouwen J. (eds.) Sociocybernetics: An actor-oriented social systems approach. Volume 1. Martinus Nijhoff, Amsterdam: 15–26.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Patel D., Fleming S. M. & Kilner J. M. (2012) Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 4853–4860.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Peleg G., Katzir G., Peleg O., Kamara M., Brodsky L., Hel-Or H., Keren D. & Nevo E. (2006) Hereditary family signature of facial expression. PNAS 103(43): 15921–15926
http://www.pnas.org/content/103/43/15921
Rodríguez D. & Arnold M. (1991) Sociedad y teoría de sistemas [Society and systems theory]. Universitaria, Santiago de Chile.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roethlisberger F. & Dickson W. J. (1939) Management and the Worker. An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schumacher P. (2011) The autopoiesis of architecture: A new framework for architecture. Volume I. John Wiley & Sons, Wiltshire.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schutz A. (1972) Alfred Schutz Gesammelte Aufsätze. Band 2: Studien zur soziologischen Theorie [Alfred Schutz collected essays. Volume 2: Studies on sociological theory]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shannon C. E. (1948) The Mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Smuts J. C. (1926) Holism and evolution. Macmillan, London. Reprinted in 1973 by Greenwood Press, West Port CT.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spencer H. (1887) The factors of organic evolution. D. Appleton & Company, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spencer H. (1912) The principles of sociology. Volume I. D. Appleton & Company, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stewart J. (2004) La vie existe-t-elle? Réconcilier la génétique et la biologie [English translation: Does life exist? Reconciling genetics and biology]. Vuibert, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stichweh R. (1987) Die Autopoiesis der Wissenschaft [The autopoiesis of science]. In: Baecker D., Markowitz J., Stichweh R., Tyrell H. & Willke H. (eds.) Theorie als Passion. Niklas Luhmann zum 60. Geburtstag. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: 447–481.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tyrell H. (1978) Anfragen an die Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Differenzierung [Questions on the theory of social differentiation]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 7(2): 175–193.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Valenzuela F. (2011) Painting as a form of communication in colonial Central Andes variations on the form of ornamental art in early world society. Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Luzern, Switzerland.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vanderstraeten R. (2002) The autopoiesis of educational organizations: The impact of the organizational setting on educational interaction. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19(3): 243–253.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1981) Describing the logic of the living. The adequacy and limitations of the idea of autopoiesis. In: Zeleny M. (ed.) Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. Elsevier North Holland, New York: 36–48.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wiener N. (1948) Cybernetics: Or, control and communication in the animal and the machine. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zeleny M. & Pierre N. A. (1976) Simulation of self-renewing systems. In: Jantsch E. & Waddington C. H. (eds.) Evolution and consciousness: Human systems in transition. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA: 150–165.
http://cepa.info/1208
Zeleny M. (1977) Self-organization of living systems: A formal model of autopoiesis. International Journal of General Systems 4(1): 13–28.
http://cepa.info/1203
Zeleny M. (1981) Autogenesis: On the self-organization of life. In: Zeleny M. (ed.) Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. Elsevier North Holland, New York NY: 91–115.
http://cepa.info/1204
Zeleny M. (1996) On social nature of autopoietic systems. In: Khalil E. L. & Boulding K. E. (eds.) Evolution, order and complexity. Routledge, London: 122–145.
http://cepa.info/1206
Zeleny M. (1997) Autopoiesis and self-sustainability in economic systems. Human Systems Management 16(4): 251–262. Avalable at http://cepa.info/1212
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zeleny M. (2010) Machine/organism dichotomy of free-market economics: Crisis or transformation? Human Systems Management 29(4): 191–204.
http://cepa.info/1209
Zeleny M. (ed.) (1980) Autopoiesis, dissipative structures, and spontaneous social orders. AAAS Selected Symposium 55. Westview Press, Boulder CO.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zolo D. (1995) Autopoiesis: Crítica de un paradigma posmoderno [Autopoiesis: Critique of a postmodern paradigm]. Zona Abierta 70/71: 203–262.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.