Abstract
Upshot: Constructionism must return to its epistemological roots to make any lasting impact on education. Constructionism should be transformed from a framework of action into ways to conceptualize and record what people actually do in constructionist environments so that theories of knowledge-building acts can be tested and the designing of those environments can be made more effective.
Citation
Noss R. & Clayson J. (2015) Reconstructing constructionism. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 285–288. http://constructivist.info/10/3/285
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Brennan K. & Resnick M. (2013) Imagining, creating, playing, sharing, reflecting: How online community supports young people as designers of interactive media. In: Lavigne N. & Mouza C. (eds.) Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective. Springer, New York: 253–268.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Confrey J. & Maloney A. (2007) A theory of mathematical modelling in technological settings. In: Blum W., Galbraith P. L., Henn H.-W. & Niss M. (eds.) Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study. Springer, New York: 57–68.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
diSessa A. A. & Cobb P. (2004) Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(1): 77–103.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoyles C. & Lagrange J.-B. (eds.) (2009) Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain. Springer, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoyles C. & Noss R. (1987) Synthesising mathematical conceptions and their formalisation through the construction of a Logo-based school maths curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 18(4): 581–595.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noss R. & Hoyles C. (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.