Volume 10 · Number 3 ·
Pages 289–296
Beyond Technocentrism: Supporting Constructionism in the Classroom
Log in to download the full text for free
Abstract
Context: In 2015, we are surrounded by tools and technologies for creating and making, thinking and learning. But classroom “learning” is often focused on learning about the tool/technology itself, rather than learning with or through the technology. Problem: A constructionist theory of learning offers useful ways for thinking about how technology can be included in the service of learning in K-12 classrooms. To support constructionism in the classroom, we need to focus on supporting teachers, who necessarily serve as the agents of classroom-level innovations. This article explores a central question: How can we support teachers to engage with constructionism as a way to think beyond a technocentric view in the classroom? Method: I approach this work from the perspective of a designer, using the process of supporting teachers working with the Scratch programming language in K-12 classrooms as a central example. I draw on reflections from six years of the ScratchEd project, which includes interviews with 30 teachers, and observations from teacher professional development events and an online community of educators. Results: I describe five sets of tensions that I encountered while designing the ScratchEd model of professional development: tensions between (1) tool and learning, (2) direction and discovery, (3) individual and group, (4) expert and novice, and (5) actual and aspirational. I describe how these tensions are negotiated within the elements of the PD model (an online community, participatory meetups, and an online workshop). Implications: The tensions I describe are not specific to Scratch, and can serve as a more general model for PD designers to scrutinize and critique. Constructivist content: This work contributes to ongoing conversations and questions about how to support constructivist/constructionist approaches in classrooms.
Key words: Constructionism, technocentrism, teachers, professional development, ScratchEd
Citation
Brennan K. (2015) Beyond technocentrism: Supporting constructionism in the classroom. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 289–296. http://constructivist.info/10/3/289
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Ackermann E. (1996) Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In: Kafai Y. B. & Resnick M. (eds.) Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey: 25–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alderton E., Brunsell E. & Bariexca D. (2011) The end of isolation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(3): 1–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alexander R. (2008) pedagogy, curriculum and culture. In: Murphy P., Hall K. & Soler J. (eds.) Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities. Sage, London: 3–27. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Angeli C. & Valanides N. (2009) Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education 52: 154–168. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Arigue M. & Blomhøj M. (2013) Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education 45: 797–810. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ball D. L. & Cohen D. K. (1999) Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In: Sykes G. & Darling-Hammond L. (eds.) Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco: 3–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bandura A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barab S. A., Barnett M. & Squire K. (2002) Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11(4): 489–542. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barab S. A., MaKinster J. G. & Scheckler R. (2003) Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. The Information Society 19(3): 237–256. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bertram A. & Waldrip B. (2013) ICT for ICT’s sake: Secondary teachers’ views on technology as a tool for teaching and learning. Australian Educational Computing 28(1): 61–70. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Borko H. (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 33(8): 3–15. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Borko H., Jacobs J. & Koellner K. (2010) Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In: Peterson P., Baker E. & McGaw G. (eds.) International encyclopedia of education. Third edition.. Elsevier, Oxford: 548–556. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boule M. (2011) Mob rule learning: camps, unconferences, and trashing the talking head. Information Today, Medford NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bransford J., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R., Donovan M. S. & Pellegrino J. W. (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Revised edition. National Academies Press, Washington. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brennan K. & Resnick M. (2013) Imagining, creating, playing, sharing, reflecting: How online community supports young people as designers of interactive media. In: Lavigne N. & Mouza C. (eds.) Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective. Springer, New York: 253–268. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brennan K. (2013) Learning computing through creating and connecting. Computer 46(9): 52–59. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brennan K. (2014) Audience in the service of learning: How kids negotiate attention in an online community of interactive media designers. Learning, Media and Technology: 1–20. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown A. L. & Campione J. C. (1996) Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In: Schauble L. & Glaser R. (eds.) Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 234–265. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown J. S., Collins A. & Duguid P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1): 32–42. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bruckman A. (1998) Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7(1–2): 47–86. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bruckman A. (2006) Learning in online communities. In: Sawyer K. (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York: 461–472. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brunvand S., Fishman B. & Marx R. (2005) Moving professional development online: Meeting the needs and expectations of all teachers. In: Dangel J. R. & Guyton E. (eds.) Research on alternative and non-traditional education. Association of Teacher Educators, Oxford: 205–232. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buckingham D. & Willett R. (eds.) (2006) Digital generations: Children, young people, and new media. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buckingham D. (2007) Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Polity, Malden MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Butler D. (2004) Self-determined teacher learning in a digital context: Fundamental change in thinking and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Dublin City University, Dublin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cherubini M., Gash H. & McCloughlin T. (2008) The DigitalSeed: An interactive toy for investigating plants. Journal of Biological Education 42(3): 123–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cole M. & Wertsch J. V. (1996) Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human-Development 39(5): 250–256. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Collins A. & Halverson R. (2009) Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Collins A. (2006) Cognitive apprenticeship. In: Sawyer K. (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 47–60. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Conneely C., Girvan C., Lawlor J. & Tangney B. (2015) An exploratory case study into the adaption of the Bridge21 model for 21st century learning in Irish classrooms. In: Butler D., Marshall K. & Leahy M. (eds.) Shaping our future: How the lessons of the past can shape educational transformation. Liffey Press, Dublin: 348–381. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cuban L. (2001) Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Daly C., Pachler N. & Pelletier C. (2009) Continuing professional development in ICT for teachers: A literature review. BECTA, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Jong T. & Pieters J. (2006) The design of powerful learning environments. In: Alexander P. A. & Winne P. H. (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology. Second edition. Routledge, Mahwah NJ: 739–754. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Doig B. & Groves S. (2011) Japanese lesson study: Teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development 13(1): 77–93. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dweck C. (2000) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Lillington NC. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Farooq U., Schank P., Harris A., Fusco J. & Schlager M. (2007) Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: A case study of designing Tapped In. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16(4–5): 397–429. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fernandez M. L. (2010) Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(2): 351–362. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer G. & Nakakoji K. (1997) Computational environments supporting creativity in the context of lifelong learning and design. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems 10(4): 21–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer G. (2002) Beyond “couch potatoes”: From consumers to designers and active contributors. First Monday 7(12) http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1010/931
Fishman B. J. & Davis E. A. (2006) Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In: Sawyer K. (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 535–550. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fishman B. J., Davis E. A. & Chan C. K. K. (2014) A learning sciences perspective on teacher learning research. In: Sawyer R. K. (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, New York: 707–725. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Flavell J. H. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10): 906–911. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fulton F., Doerr H. & Britton T. (2010) STEM teachers in professional learning communities: A knowledge synthesis. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gardner H. (1983) Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gardner H. (1991) The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gardner H. (1999) Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gash H. & McCloughlin T. (2010) Primary and secondary school differences in thinking about science. International Journal of Educational Researchers 1(3): 92–102. http://ijer.eab.org.tr/pages/past-issue/2010-volume-1-issue-3.php
Gash H. (2014) Constructing constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 302–310. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/9/3/302.gash
Gilligan C. (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Groupe Interuniversitaire Projet Sophia (2009) Formation des enseignants : un exemple de recherche-action: Chypre, France, lrlande, République tchèque, Slovénie. Review Internationale D’Éducation de Sèvres 51: 47–58. https://ries.revues.org/660
Guskey T. R. (2002) Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership 59(6): 45–51. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar02/vol59/num06/Does-It-Make-a-Difference¢-Evaluating-Professional-Development.aspx
Harel I. & Papert S. (1990) Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments 1(1): 1–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hill H. C. (2007) Teachers’ ongoing learning: Evidence from research and practice. The Future of Children 17: 111–128. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hill H. C., Beisiegel M. & Jacob R. (2013) Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher 42(9): 476–487. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoyles C., Noss R., Kent P. & Bakker A. (2010) Improving mathematics at work: The need for technomathematical literacies. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ito M. (2009) Engineering play: A cultural history of children’s software. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ito M., Baumer S., Bittanti M., boyd d., Cody R., Herr-Stephenson B., Horst H. A., Lange P. G., Mahendran D., Martínez K. Z., Pascoe C. J., Perkel D., Robinson L., Sims C. & Tripp L. (2009) Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. MIT Press: Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jenkins H., Purushotma R., Weigel M., Clinton K. & Robison A. (2006) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kafai Y. B. & Resnick M. (eds.) (1996) Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kafai Y. B. (1995) Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kimmons R. (2015) Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 23(1): 53–77. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Knowles J. G. (1992) Models for understanding pre-service teachers and beginning teachers’ biographies. In: Goodson I. F. (ed.) Studying teachers’ lives. Routledge, London: 99–152. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kolodner J., Camp P. J., Crismond D., Fasse B., Gray J., Holbrook J., Puntambekar S. & Ryan M. (2003) Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(4): 495–547. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Koschmann T., Kelson A., Feltovich P. & Barrows H. (1996) Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In: Koschmann T. (ed.) CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 83–124. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krajcik J. S. & Blumenfeld P. C. (2006) Project-based learning. In: Sawyer K. (ed.) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 317–334. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lajoie S. P. & Azevedo R. (2006) Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In: Alexander P. A. & Winne P. H. (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology Second edition. Routledge, Mahwah NJ: 803–821. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lave J. & Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lieberman A. & Pointer Mace D. H. (2008) Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education 59(3): 226–234. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Liff S. & Shepard A. (2004) An evolving gender digital divide? Oxford Internet Institute Internet Issue Brief 2: 1–10. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lin H. T. & Fishman B. (2009) Scaffolding teacher adaptation by making design intent explicit. In: Dimitracopoulou A., O’Malley C., Suthers D. D. & Reiman P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning 2: 159–161. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mishra P. & Koehler M. J. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017–1054. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Palfrey J. & Gasser U. (2008) Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1987) Information technology and education: Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher 16(1): 22–30. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (2007) The child’s conception of the world. Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland. Originally published in French as: Piaget J. (1929) Representation du monde chez l’enfant. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Prensky M. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5): 1–6. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Razzouk R. & Shute V. (2012) What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research 82(3): 330–349. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Resnick M., Maloney J., Monroy-Hernandez A., Rusk N., Eastmond E., Brennan K., Millner A., Rosenbaum E., Silver J., Silverman B. & Kafai Y. (2009) Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM 52(11): 60–67. http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2009/11/48421-scratch-programming-for-all/fulltext
Riegler A. (2005) Editorial: The constructivist challenge. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 1–8. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/001.riegler
Rogoff B. (1994) Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1(4): 209–229. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sawyer K. (2006) Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scardamalia M. & Bereiter C. (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(1): 37–68. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seiter E. (2008) Practicing at home: Computers, pianos, and cultural capital. In: McPherson T. (ed.) Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 27–52. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Selwyn N. (2009) The digital native: Myth and reality. New Information Perspectives 61(4): 364–379. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Selwyn N. (2011) Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Selwyn N. (2014) Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sharkey M. (2014) Teachers’ beliefs and constructivism. Unpublished masters’ thesis. Dublin City University, Dublin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Swanson K. N. & Leanness A. (2012) Edcamp: A qualitative exploration. http://edcamp.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Edcamp_Whitepaper_Final.pdf
Tapscott D. (2008) Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Taylor P. C., Fraser B. J. & Fisher D. L. (1997) Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research 27: 293–302. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turkle S. & Papert S. (1990) Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs 16(1): 128–157. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes 14th edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wake G. (2014) Making sense of and with mathematics: The interface between academic mathematics and mathematics in practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 86: 271–290. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Watanabe T. (2002) Learning from Japanese lesson study. Educational Leadership 59(6): 36–39. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Webster-Wright A. (2009) Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research 79(2): 702–739. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wenger E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wenger E., McDermott R. & Snyder W. M. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Westheimer J. (2008) Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of education. In: Cochran-Smith M., Feiman-Nemser S., McIntyre D. J. & Demers K. E. (eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education. Third edition. Routledge, New York: 756–783. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Windschitl M. (2002) Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research 72(2): 131–175. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wiske M. S., Perkins D. N. & Spicer D. E. (2006) Piaget goes digital: Negotiating accommodation of practice to principles. In: Dede C. (ed.) Online professional development for teachers. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge MA: 9–67. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.