Learning about Learning with Teachers and (from) Young Children
Chrystalla Papademetri-Kachrimani
Download the full text in
PDF (1556 kB)
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Convictions arising from different, separate and distinct domains and paradigms (modeling-based learning (MbL), Papert’s constructionism, literature on play from the domain of early childhood education, complexity theory) agree in favor of a need for a shift in education that will allow (young) children to access what Papert refers to as “hard learning” that consequently leads to “hard fun.” Problem: Nevertheless, such an achievement demands supporting learning in a manner that seems difficult for teachers to comprehend and handle. Method: In this article, we provide three learning stories. These constitute parts of an effort to develop a joint mathematics and science curriculum for early childhood education parallel to supporting teachers so that they deliver and, at the same time, are able to value and assess the learning involved. The first story concerns teachers’ learning whereas the second and third story concern 5-year-olds’ learning. Results: In all three stories, we see how the researcher (author), teachers and children learn (about creative learning) together. By the end of this article, the three stories will allow us to describe and redefine MbL and at the same time highlight the constructivism foundations of MbL and the common ground between MbL and the constructionism paradigm. Implications: Furthermore, the stories as a whole will allow us to argue that all it takes to move away from traditional practices is a shift in how learning is conceptualized. Constructivist content: The article is built on the constructionism approach, which focuses on the value of learners acquiring access to powerful ideas through meaningful constructivist learning processes.
Key words: Mathematics, teacher education, modeling-based learning, early childhood education, creative learning
Citation
Papademetri-Kachrimani C. (2015) Learning about learning with teachers and (from) young children. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 370–381. http://constructivist.info/10/3/370
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Abbott L. (1994) “Play is ace!” Developing play in schools and classrooms. In: Moyles J. (ed.) The excellence of play. Open University Press, Buckingham: 76–87.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ackermann E. (2004) Constructing knowledge and Transforming the world. In: Tokoro M. & Steels L. (eds.) A learning zone of one’s own : Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 17–35.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ball D. L. (1988) Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics 8(1): 40–48.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bartlett S. & Burton D. (2012) Introduction to education studies. Third edition. Sage, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cadwell L. B. (2003) Bringing learning to life: The Reggio approach to early childhood education. Teachers College Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cavallo D. (1999) Project Lighthouse in Thailand: Guiding pathways to powerful learning. In: Logo philosophy and implementation. Logo Computer Systems Inc. (LCSI), Montreal: 128–164.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davis B. & Sumara D. J. (2000) Curriculum forms: On the assumed shapes of knowing and knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies 32(6): 821–845.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eisner E. (1983) “Educational objectives: Help or hindrance?” Elliott Eisner [1967]. American Journal of Education 91(4): 549–560.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
English L. D. & Watters J. J. (2005) Mathematical modelling in the early school years. Mathematics Education Research Journal 16(3): 58–79.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
English L. D., Fox J. L. & Watters J. J. (2005) Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teaching Children Mathematics 12(3): 156–163.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ferguson R. (2012) Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4(5/6): 304–317.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer G. (2009) End-user development and meta-design: Foundations for cultures of participation. In: Pipek V., Rossen M. B., deRuyter B. & Wulf V. (eds.) End-user development. Springer, New York. 3–14.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fox J. L. (2006) A justification for mathematical modelling experiences in the preparatory classroom. In: Grootenboer P., Zevenbergen R. & Chinnappan M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Canberra: 221–228.
http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP232006.pdf
Hoyles C. (2002) From describing to designing mathematical activity: The next step in developing a social approach to research in mathematics education? In: Kieran C., Forman E. & Sfard A. (eds.) Learning discourse: Discursive approaches to research in mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 273–286.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Katz L. (1998) What can we learn from Reggio Emilia. In: Edwards C. P., Gandini L. & Forman G. E. (eds.) The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach – Advanced reflections. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport CT: 27–45.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lesh R. & Doerr H. M. (2003) Foundations of a models and modelling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problem solving. In: Lesh R. & Doerr H. M. (eds.) Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ: 3–33.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lesh R., English L., Sevis S. & Riggs C. (2013) Modeling as a means for making powerful ideas accessible to children at an early age. In: Hegedus J. & Roschelle J. (eds.) The SimCalc vision and contributions. Springer, New York: 419–436.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noss R. & Hoyles C. (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings. learning cultures and computers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nunes T. & Bryant P. (1996) Children doing mathematics. Wiley-Blackwell, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papademetri-Kachrimani C. (2014) “How many circles are in the shape?” Defining modelling-based Learning (MbL) through the iterative implementation of a specific activity to groups of early childhood teachers. In: Futschek G. & Kynigos C. (eds.) Constructionism and creativity: Proceedings of the Third International Constructionism Conference. Austrian Computer Society, Vienna: 156–166.
http://constructionism2014.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/papers/2.3_1–8521.pdf
Papert S. (1980) Computer-based microworlds as incubators for powerful ideas. In: Taylor R. (ed.) The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. Teacher’s College Press, New York: 203–210.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Philippou S., Papademetri-Kachrimani C. & Louca L. (2015) “The exchange of ideas was mutual, I have to say”: Negotiating researcher and teacher “roles” in an early years educators’ professional development programme on inquiry-based mathematics and science learning. Professional Development in Education 41(2): 382–400.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Postman N. & Weingartner C. (1969) Teaching as a subversive activity. First Delta Printing. New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Resnick M. (2014) Give P’s a chance: Projects, peers, passion, play. In: Futschek G. & Kynigos C. (eds.) Constructionism and creativity: Proceedings of the Third International Constructionism Conference. Austrian Computer Society, Vienna: 13–20.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rudduck J. (ed.) (1995) An education that empowers: A collection of lectures in memory of Lawrence Stenhouse. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stenhouse L. (1970) Some limitations of the use of objectives in curriculum research and planning. Paedagogica Europaea 6: 73–83.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson A. G. (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In: Grouws D. A. (ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York: 127–146.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
