Download the full text in
PDF (116 kB)
Upshot: In view of Kenny’s clinical insights, Hug’s notes on the intricacies of rational vs. a-rational “knowing” in the design sciences, and Chronaki & Kynigos’s notice of mathematics teachers’ meta-communication on experiences of change, this response reframes the heuristic power of bisociation and suspension of disbelief in the light of Kelly’s notion of “as-if-ism” (constructive alternativism. Doing as-if and playing what-if, I reiterate, are critical to mitigating intra-and inter-personal relations, or meta-communicating. Their epistemic status within the radical constructivist framework is cast in the context of mutually enriching conversational techniques, or language-games, inspired by Maturana’s concepts of “objectivity in parenthesis” and the multiverse.
Ackermann E. K. (2015) Author’s response: Impenetrable minds, delusion of shared experience: Let’s pretend (“dicciamo che io ero la mamma”). Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 418–421. http://constructivist.info/10/3/418
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.