Exploring Alternatives to the Traditional Conference Format: Introduction to the Special Issue on Composing Conferences
Ben Sweeting & Michael Hohl
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The design of academic conferences, in which settings ideas are shared and created, is, we suggest, of more than passing interest in constructivism, where epistemology is considered in terms of knowing rather than knowledge. Problem: The passivity and predominantly one-way structure of the typical paper presentation format of academic conferences has a number of serious limitations from a constructivist perspective. These limits are both practical and epistemological. While alternative formats abound, there is nevertheless increasing pressure reinforcing this format due to delegates’ funding typically being linked to reading a paper. Method: In this special issue, authors reflect on conferences that they have organised and participated in that have used alternative formats, such as conversational structures or other constructivist inspired approaches, in whole or in part. We review and contextualize their contributions, understanding them in terms of their connections to constructivism and to each other. Results: While this issue is of relevance across disciplinary boundaries, contributions focus on two fields: that of cybernetics/systems, and that of design. We identify the way that conference organization is of particular importance to these fields, being in self-reflexive relationship to them: the environment of a design conference is something that we design; while a conference regarding systems or cybernetics is itself an instance of the sorts of process with which these fields are concerned. Implications: Building on this self-reflexivity and, also, the close connection of design and cybernetics/systems to constructivism, we suggest that conference organization is an area in which constructivism may itself be understood in terms of practice (and so knowing) rather than theory (and so knowledge. This in turn helps connect ideas in constructivism with pragmatic fields, such as knowledge management, and recent discussions in this journal regarding second-order science. Constructivist content: As a setting for the creation of new ideas, the design of conferences is of importance where we understand epistemology in constructivist terms as a process of knowing. Moreover, the particular fields drawn on - design and cybernetics/systems - have close connections to constructivism, as can be seen, for instance, in the work of Ranulph Glanville, on which we draw here.
Key words: Conference, knowing, design, cybernetics, systems, tacit knowledge, reflection, double-loop learning, feedback, knowledge management, communication, second-order science, second-order cybernetics
Citation
Sweeting B. & Hohl M. (2015) Exploring alternatives to the traditional conference format: Introduction to the special issue on composing conferences. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 1–7. http://constructivist.info/11/1/001
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Aarons J. (2011) Epistemology and knowledge management. In: David S. & Te’eni D. (eds) Encyclopedia of knowledge management. Second edition. IGI Global, Hershey PA: 270–279.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson M. C. (2004) Our own metaphor: A personal account of a conference on the effects of conscious purpose on human adaptation. Hampton Press, Cresskill NJ. Originally published in 1972.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer T. (2014) Wiener’s refiguring of a cybernetic design theory. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century. IEEE Press, Piscataway NJ: 392–398.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. & Sweeting B. (eds.) (2011) Special issue “Cybernetics: Art, design, mathematics – A meta-disciplinary conversation: Papers from the 2010 conference of the American Society for Cybernetics.” Kybernetes 40(7/8).
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2007) Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1173–1206.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2009) A (cybernetic) musing: Design and cybernetics. In: Glanville R., The black boox. Volume III: 39 steps. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 423–425.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (ed.) (2012) Trojan horses: A rattle bag from the “Cybernetics: Art, design, mathematic – A meta-disciplinary conversation” post-conference workshop. Edition echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1990) An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In: Davis R. B., Maher C. A. & Noddings N. (eds.) Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph 4: 19–30.
http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/127
Jonas W. (2007) Research through DESIGN through research: A cybernetic model of designing design foundations. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1362–1380.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jones J. C. (1984) Voices at the conference conference. In: Jones J. C., Essays in design. Wiley, Chichester: 77–301. Originally published in 1982.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Koenig M. R. (2003) Knowledge management. In: Feather J. & Sturges P. (eds.) International encyclopedia of information and library science. Second revised edition. Taylor & Francis, London: 351–359.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McInerney C. (2002) Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(12): 1009–1018.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McInerney C. R. & Day R. E. (2007) Rethinking knowledge management. Springer, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead M. (1968) The cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Foerster H. von, White J. D., Peterson L. J. & Russell J. K. (eds.) Purposive systems. Spartan Books, New York: 1–11.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Medawar P. (1996) Is the scientific paper a fraud? In: Medawar P., The strange case of the spotted mice and other classic essays on science. Oxford University Press. Oxford: 33–39. Originally published in 1963.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pias C. (ed.) (2003–2004) Cybernetics – Kybernetik: The Macy conferences 1946–1953. 2 volumes. Diaphanes, Zurich.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Read S. (2015) Making architectural history. In: Making research | researching making. In: Proceedings of the Creative Practice Conference. Arkitektskolen Aarhus, Aarhus (DK): 464–473.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1991) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Farnham: Arena. Originally published in 1983.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shapin S. & Schaffer S. (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zainuddin K. M. (2007) A constructivist perspective of knowledge management theory: A KM solution to online teachers professional development. In: Atkinson R., McBeath C., Soong Swee Kit A. & Cheers C. (eds.) ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007: 526–527.
www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/khairiltotov-poster.pdf
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
