Developing a Dialogical Platform for Disseminating Research through Design
Abigail C. Durrant, John Vines, Jayne Wallace & Joyce Yee
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Practice-based design research is becoming more widely recognized in academia, including at doctoral level, yet there are arguably limited options for dissemination beyond the traditional conference format of paper-based proceedings, possibly with an exhibition or “demonstrator” component that is often non-archival. Further, the opportunities afforded by the traditional-format paper presentations is at times at odds with practice-based methodologies being presented. Purpose: We provide a first-hand descriptive account of developing and running a new international conference with an experimental format that aims to support more analogously the dissemination of practice-based design research. Method: Our approach herein is broadly interpretative, phenomenological and critically reflective in orientation, to analyze our own experiential insights from the conference conception, through to the event itself and post-conference reflections, alongside the reflections fed back by conference delegates. Results: We have found the roundtable format continues to function well for creating a discursive interactional context. However issues arose around the crucial nature of the session chair’s role in enabling rich and multi-voiced discussion and how presenters’, organizers’ and delegates’ voices were captured and documented, with implications for further developing the conference design. Looking forward, there are also questions raised about: balancing the stringency of a rigorous review process with provision of an encouraging platform for early-career researchers; and balancing the need for clear criteria and formatting standards (for assessing quality and rigor in submitted work) with the “openness” of the submission template and formatting guidelines (to encourage pioneering developments in visual argumentation. Implications: The article provides a valuable resource for practice-based design researchers who are committed to generating research understanding through applied endeavors (making things) and/or writing. This includes designers who are new to research cultures. It should also appeal to those working in interdisciplinary research in collaboration with design practitioners (but who may not be practitioners themselves. The conference aims to foster and support a burgeoning “research through design” academic community and to provide a fitting dissemination platform for this community. We hope that the conference will encourage academic communities to give proper consideration to the concept of design as a knowledge-generating activity. Constructivist content: Knowledge about design research is generated from meaningful interaction between people and artifacts as part of the unfolding conference experience. The organizational features of the conference aim to support knowledge dissemination through dialogical relations between people and things in particular contexts of interaction.
Key words: Research through design, practice-based research, dialogical relationships, embodied knowledge, new materialities, discursive dissemination platform
Citation
Durrant A. C., Vines J., Wallace J. & Yee J. (2015) Developing a dialogical platform for disseminating research through design. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 8–21. http://constructivist.info/11/1/008
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Anderson C. (2013) Makers: the new industrial revolution. Random House Business, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Biggs M. & Büchler D. (2007) Rigour and practice-based research. Design Issues 23(3): 62–69.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Biggs M. (2000) Editorial: The foundations of practice-based research. Working Papers in Art and Design, 1, 2000.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blevis E., Hauser S. & Odom W. (2015) Sharing the hidden treasure in pictorials. Interactions 22(3): 32–43.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bowers J. (2012) The logic of annotated portfolios: Communicating the value of “research through design.” In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems conference. The ACM Press, New York: 68–77.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Callon M. (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law J. (ed.) A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge, London: 132–161.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chow R. (2005) Evolution, epigenesis, and recycling in design theorizing. In: Jonas W., Chow R. & Verhaag N. (eds.) (2005) Design – system – evolution: The application of systemic and evolutionary approaches to design theory, design practice, design research and design education. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design (EAD06)
http://ead.verhaag.net/conference/
Chow R. (2010) What should be done with the different versions of Research through Design. In: Mareis C., Joost G. & Kimpel K. (eds.) Entwerfen. Wissen. Produzieren. Designforschung im Anwendungskontext. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld: 145–158.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cross N. (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design issues 17(3): 49–55.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Mul J. (2011) Redesigning design. In: van Abel B., Evers L., Klaassen R., & Troxler P. (eds.) Open design now: Why design cannot remain exclusive. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam: 34–39.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
DeLanda M. (2006) A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Academic, Bloomsbury UK.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Deleuze G. & Guattari F. (2004) A thousand plateaus. New edition translated by Brian Massumi. Continuum, London. French original published in 1980.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dunne A. & Raby F. (2013) Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Durling D. (2002) Discourses on research and the Ph.D in design. Quality Assurance in Education 10(2): 79–85.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fallman D. (2003) Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. The ACM Press, New York: 225–232.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fallman D. (2008) The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues 24(3): 4–18.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Findeli A. & Bousbaki R. (2005) L’éclipse de l’objet dans les theories du projet en design. The Design Journal VIII(3): 35–49.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Findeli A. (1998) A quest for credibility: Doctoral education and research in design at the university of Montreal. In: Buchanan R., Doordan D., Justice L. & Margolin V. (eds.) Doctoral education in design. Proceedings of the Ohio conference 8–11 October 1998: 99–116.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Findeli A. (2008) Research through design and transdisciplinarity: A tentative contribution to the methodology of design research. In: Proceedings of Swiss Design Network Symposium “Focused,” Berne, Switzerland: 67–91.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Frayling C. (1993) Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1 (1): 1–5.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Friedman K. (2003) Theory construction in design research: Criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies 24: 507–522.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Friedman K. (2008) Research into, by and for design. Journal of Visual Art Practice 7(2): 153–160.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gaver W. (2011) Making spaces: How design workbooks work. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. The ACM Press, New York: 1551–1560.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gaver W. (2012) What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York: 937–946.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (1997) A ship without a rudder. In: Glanville R. & de Zeeuw G. (eds.) Problems of excavating cybernetics and systems. BKS+, Southsea: 131–142.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2013) Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge, Abingdon.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. & Meyer-Veden J. (2004) Mind the gap! – On knowing and not–knowing in design. Hauschild-Verlag, Bremen.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2007) Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In: Michel R. (ed.) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel: 187–206.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2007) Research through DESIGN through research: A cybernetic model of designing design foundations. Kybernetes 36 (9/10): 1362–1380.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2014) A cybernetic model of design research. Towards a trans-domain of knowing. In: Rodgers P. A. & Yee J. (eds.) The Routledge companion to design research. Routledge, London: 23–37.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2015) Social transformation design as Research Through Design (RTD): Some historical, theoretical and methodological remarks. In: Jonas W., Zerwas S. & von Anshelm K. (eds.) Transformation design: Perspectives on a new design attitude. Birkhäuser, Basel: 114–133.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kolb D. A. (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Koskinen I., Zimmerman J., Binder T., Redstrom J. & Wensveen S. (2011) Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1993) We have never been modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. French original published in 1991.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Löwgren J. (1995) Applying design methodology to software development. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on designing interactive systems. ACM Press, New York: 87–95.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nelson H. G. & Stolterman E. (2003) The design way. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Niedderer K. & Roworth-Stokes S. (2007) The role and use of creative practice in research and its contribution to knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference of International Association of Societies of Design Research. Polytechnic University, Hong Kong: 1–18.
http://niedderer.org/IASDR07SRS.pdf
Niedderer K. (2007) Mapping the meaning of knowledge in design research. Design Research Quarterly 2: 5–13.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Owen C. (1998) Design research: Building the knowledge base. Design Studies 19: 9–20.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pierce J., Sengers P., Hirsch T., Jenkins T., Gaver W. & DiSalvo C. (2015) Expanding and refining design and criticality in HCI. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, Seoul (South Korea): 2083–2092.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. W. J. & Webber M. M. (1972) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 194. University of California, Berkeley.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. W. J. & Webber M. M. (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems. In: Cross N. (ed.) Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 135–144. Originally published in 1973.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rust C. (2007) Unstated contributions – how artistic inquiry can inform interdisciplinary research. International Journal of Design 1(3): 69–76.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rust C., Mottram J. & Till J. (2007) AHRC research review practice-led research in art, design and architecture. Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK.
http://shura.shu.ac.uk/7596/
Schön D. (1991) The reflective practitioner. Paperback Edition. Ashgate, Farnham UK. Originally published in 1983.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stolterman E. (2008) The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2(1): 55–65.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Swann C. (2002) Action research and the practice of design. Design Issues 18(1): 49–61.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Twigger Holroyd A. (2015) Re-knitting: Exploring openness through design. In: Proceedings of the Second Biennial Research Through Design conference, 25–27 March 2015, Cambridge UK: Article 33.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
van Abel B., Evers L., Klaassen R. & Troxler P. (eds.) (2011) Open design now: Why design cannot remain exclusive. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wallace J., Yee J. & Durrant A. (2014) Reflections on a synergistic format for disseminating research through design. In: Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York: 781–790.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wolf T., Rode J., Sussman J. & Kellogg W. (2006) Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York: 521–530.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Yee J., Jefferies E. & Tan L. (2013) Design transitions: Inspiring stories. Global viewpoints. How design is changing. BIS, Amsterdam.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zimmerman J., Stolterman E. & Forlizzi J. (2010) An analysis and critique of Research through Design. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’10) ACM Press, Aarhus (Denmark): 310–319.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
