Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: As a reply to the criticism that anthropomorphism and modern science are incompatible, targeting Jonasian phenomenology and Varelian enactivism, I suggest considering the concept of modern anthropomorphism, which seems prima facie compatible with the pluralistic situation of today’s life sciences. My further claim is that the phenomenological method is intrinsically linked with this sort of anthropomorphism.
Gaitsch P. (2016) Modern anthropomorphism and phenomenological method. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 220–221. http://constructivist.info/11/2/220
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.