Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: We argue that Villalobos and Ward’s criticism misses two crucial aspects of Varelian enactivism. These are, first, that enactivism attempts to offer a rigorous scientific justification for its teleological claims, and second, that enactivism in fact pays too little attention to the nature of human phenomenology and intentionality, rather than anthropomorphically over-valuing it.
Gahrn-Andersen R. & Harvey M. I. (2016) Phenomenological teleology and human interactivity. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 224–226. http://constructivist.info/11/2/224
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.