Volume 11 · Number 2 · Pages 265–276
Sensorimotor Direct Realism: How We Enact Our World

Michael Beaton

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Direct realism is a non-reductive, anti-representationalist theory of perception lying at the heart of mainstream analytic philosophy, where it is currently generating a lot of interest. For all that, it is widely held to be both controversial and anti-scientific. On the other hand, the sensorimotor theory of perception (which is a specific development of Gibsonian approaches to perception) initially generated a lot of interest within enactive philosophy of cognitive science, but has arguably not yet delivered on its initial promise. Problem: I aim to show that the sensorimotor theory and direct realism complement each other, and that the result is a philosophically radical, but fully scientifically realised, theory of perception. Method: The article uses (non-reductive) philosophical analysis and discussion. It also draws on empirical evidence from the relevant cognitive sciences. Results: Direct realism can be augmented by sensorimotor theory to become a scientifically tractable alternative to the mainstream, representationalist research programme within cognitive science. Implications: The article aims to further clarify the philosophical importance of the sensorimotor approach to perception. It also aims to show that the apparently radical claim that we perceive objects themselves is amenable to normal scientific study. Constructivist content: Objects are analysed as a kind of collaboration between the world and the perceiver. On this account, we can never perceive outside the categories of our own understanding, but we do perceive genuinely outside our own heads. Thus, the approach here is not exactly constructivism, though it shares many goals and results with constructivism.

Key words: Sensorimotor theory of perception, direct realism, phenomenology, non-reductive ontology, consciousness.


Beaton M. (2016) Sensorimotor direct realism: How we enact our world. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 265–276. http://constructivist.info/11/2/265

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Beaton M. (2013) Phenomenology and Embodied Action
Beaton M., Pierce B. & Stuart S. (2013) Neurophenomenology – A Special Issue
Le Moigne J.-L. (2011) From Jean Piaget to Ernst von Glasersfeld: An Epistemological Itinerary in Review
Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature
Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic Pragmaticism and Constructivism


Andersson R. L. (1988) Robot ping-pong player. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bach-y-Rita P. (2004) Tactile sensory substitution studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1013: 83–91. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beaton M. (2009) An analysis of qualitative feel as the introspectible subjective aspect of a space of reasons. Doctoral Thesis. University of Sussex UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beaton M. (2009) Qualia and introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16: 88–110. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beaton M. (2013) Phenomenology and embodied action. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 298–313. http://constructivist.info/8/3/298
Beaton M. (2014) Learning to perceive what we do not yet understand: Letting the world guide us. In: Cappuccio M., Froese T. (eds.) Enactive cognition at the edge of sense-making: Making sense of non-sense. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke UK: 153–180. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beer R. D. (2003) The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior 11: 209–243. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Berger P. & Luckmann T. (1966) The social construction of reality. Anchor Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bickhard M. H. & Terveen L. (1995) Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. North Holland, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bishop J. M. & Martin A. O. (2014) Contemporary sensorimotor theory: A brief introduction. In: Bishop J. M. & Martin A. O. (eds.) Contemporary sensorimotor theory. Springer, Heidelberg: 1–22. http://cepa.info/2525
Bishop J. M. (2002) Dancing with pixies: Strong artificial intelligence and panpyschism. In: Preston J. & Bishop J. M. (eds.) Views into the Chinese room: New essays on Searle and artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 360–378. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bishop J. M. (2005) Can computers feel? The AISB Quarterly 199: 6. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bishop J. M. (2009) A cognitive computation fallacy? Cognition, computations and panpsychism. Cognitive Computation 1(3): 221–233. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bishop J. M. (2009) Why computers can’t feel pain. Minds and Machines 19(4): 507–516. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
BonJour L. (2013) Epistemological problems of perception. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/perception-episprob/
Boxer P. & Kenny V. (1990) The economy of discourses: A third-order cybernetics? Human Systems Management 9(4): 205–224. http://cepa.info/2383
Braitenberg V. (1984) Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brentari C. (2015) Jakob von Uexküll: The discovery of the Umwelt between biosemiotics and theoretical biology. Springer, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Buhrmann T. & Di Paolo E. (2014) Non-representational sensorimotor knowledge. In: Del Pobil A. P, Chinellato E., Ester Martinez-Martin E., Hallam J., Cervera E. & Morales A. (eds.) From animals to animats 13. Springer, New York: 21–31. http://cepa.info/2521
Byrne A., Logue H. (2009) Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Carroll L. (1895) What the Tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chalmers D. (1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chaudhury S. (2010) Hallucinations: Clinical aspects and management. Industrial Psychiatry Journal 19(1): 5–12. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. & Toribio J. (1994) Doing without representing? Synthese 101(3): 401–431. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. (2001) Mindware. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Crane T. (2006) Is there a perceptual relation? In: Gendler T. S. & Hawthorne J. (eds.) Perceptual experience. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 126–146. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davidson D. (1974) On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Deacon T. (2012) Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. W. W. Norton, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Degenaar J. & Myin E. (2015) Representation-hunger reconsidered. Synthese 191(15): 3639–3648. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dennett D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dewey J. (1960) The quest for certainty. Capricorn, New York. Originally published 1929. http://cepa.info/1889
Di Paolo E. (2009) Extended Life. Topoi 28: 9–21. http://cepa.info/322
Di Paolo E., Barandiaran X., Beaton M. & Buhrmann T. (2014) Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 00551. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00551/full
Dretske F. (1988) Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of Causes. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fazekas P. (2011) Cognitive architecture and the epistemic gap: Defending physicalism without phenomenal concepts. Philosophia 39(1): 21–29. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fernández-Ruiz J. & Díaz R. (1999) Prism adaptation and aftereffect: Specifying the properties of a procedural memory system. Learning and Memory 6(1): 47–53. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Floridi L. (2011) A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy 42(3): 282–304. http://cepa.info/2384
Froese T. (2014) Steps toward an enactive account of synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 126–127. http://cepa.info/2526
Fultot M. F. (2016) Counterfactuals versus constraints: Towards an implementation theory of sensorimotor mastery. Journal of Consciousness Studies. In press. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gibson J. J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gibson J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton, New York: 17–40. Originally published in German as: Glasersfeld E. (1981) Einführung in den Radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) Die Erfundene Wirklichkeit. Piper, Munich: 16–38. http://cepa.info/1279
Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 12–29. http://cepa.info/1420
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty years radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 9–12. http://constructivist.info/1/1/009
Haddock A. & Macpherson F. (2008) Disjunctivism: Perception, action, knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harnad S. (ed.) (1994) What is computation? Special issue. Minds and Machines 4(4). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harvey I., Di Paolo E., Wood R., Quinn M., Tuci E. & Iridia E. T. (2005) Evolutionary robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artificial Life 11: 79–98. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (1977) The origin of the work of art. In: Krell D. F. (ed.) Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. Harper and Row, New York: 139–212. German original published in 1935. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (2008) The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: World, finitude, solitude. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Originally a lecture course given in 1929/30. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hinton J. M. (1973) Experiences: An inquiry into some ambiguities. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hume D. (1748) An enquiry concerning human understanding. London. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/9662
Hurley S. (2010) The varieties of externalism. In: Menary R. (ed.) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 101–153. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Izquierdo E. & Di Paolo E. (2005) Is an embodied system ever purely reactive? In: Capcarrere M. S., Freitas A. A., Bentley P. J., Johnson C. G. & Timmis J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Artificial Life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 252–261. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kant I. (1996) Critique of pure reason. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis. German original published in 1781/1787. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Koffka K. (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. Lund Humphries, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kohlberg L. (1969) Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin D. (ed.) Handbook of socialization theory and research. Rand McNally, Chicago: 347–480. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kohler I. (1964) The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Psychological Issues 3: 19–134. Originally published in German as: Kohler I. (1951) Über Aufbau und Wandlungen der Wahrnehmungswelt. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte, philosophisch-historische Klasse 227: 1–118. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. & Woolgar S. (1979) Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage, Beverly Hills. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laureys S. (ed.) (2005) The boundaries of consciousness: Neurobiology and neuropathology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Levine J. (1983) Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 354–361. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Locke J. (1689) An essay concerning human understanding. London. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10615
Marr D. (1982) Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Martin M. G. F. (2002) The transparency of experience. Mind and Language 4: 376–425. http://cepa.info/2401
Martin M. G. F. (2004) The limits of self-awareness. Philosophical Studies 120: 37–89. http://cepa.info/2402
Maudlin T. (1989) Computation and consciousness. Journal of Philosophy (86): 407–432. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mayr E. (1974) Behaviour programs and evolutionary strategies. American Scientist 62(6): 650–659. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McDowell J. (1982) Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 455–479. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McDowell J. (1994) The content of perceptual experience. The Philosophical Quarterly 44: 190–205. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McDowell J. (1996) Mind and world: With a new introduction by the author. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McDowell J. (2009) Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (1962) The phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. French original published in 1945. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merlin D. (1993) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Metzinger T. (2003) Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Neisser U. (1976) Cognition and reality. Freeman, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (1999) Thought and experience. American Philosophical Quarterly 36: 257–265. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2003) Causation and perception: The puzzle unravelled. Analysis 63: 93–100. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë A. (2009) Out of our heads. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Omnès R. (1999) Quantum philosophy: Understanding and interpreting contemporary science. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. French original published in 1994. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan J. K. & Noë A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5): 883–917. http://cepa.info/2285
O’Regan J. K. (2011) Why red does not sound like a bell: Understanding the feel of consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan J. K. (2012) How to build a robot that is conscious and feels. Minds and Machines: 22(2): 117–136. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan K. Myin E. & Noë A. (2004) Towards an analytic phenomenology: The concepts of “bodiliness” and “grabbiness.” In: Carsetti A. (ed.) Seeing, thinking and knowing. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 103–114. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Peacocke C. (2001) Does perception have a nonconceptual content? Journal of Philosophy 98: 239–264. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Philipona D. L. & O’Regan J. K. (2006) Color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Visual Neuroscience 23: 331–339. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Philipona D. L. & O’Regan J. K. (2008) Reply to Johnson and Wright. Visual Neuroscience 25: 225–226. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Philipona D., O’Regan J. K. & Nadal J. P. (2003) Is there something out there? Inferring space from sensorimotor dependencies. Neural Computation 15: 2029–2049. http://cepa.info/2527
Piaget J. (1954) The construction of reality in the child. Ballantine, New York. Originally published in French as: Piaget J. (1937) La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Délachaux & Niestlé, Neuchâtel. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Putnam H. (1988) Representation and reality. Bradford Books, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ramsey W. (2015) Must cognition be representational? Synthese. Online First. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roberts T. (2010) Understanding “sensorimotor understanding.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9(1): 101–111. http://cepa.info/2528
Searle J. (1990) Is the brain a digital computer? Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 64: 21–37. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sedivy S. (2008) Starting afresh disjunctively : Perceptual engagement with the world. In: Haddock A. & Macpherson F. (eds.) Disjunctivism: Perception, action, knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 348–375. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sellars W. (1963) Science, perception and reality. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seth A. K. (2014) A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: Explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 97–118. http://cepa.info/2529
Shoemaker S. (1996) The first-person perspective and other essays. Cambridge University Press, New York NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Skinner B. F. (1974) About behaviorism. Knopf: New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Speaks J. (2009) Transparency, intentionalism, and the nature of perceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79: 539–573. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (1994) Colour vision: A study in cognitive science and philosophy of science. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2001) Between ourselves: Second-person issues in the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tomasello M. (2001) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In: Schiller C. (ed.) Instinctive behavior. International Universities Press, New York: 5–80. German original published in 1934. http://cepa.info/2403
Uexküll J. von (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wittgenstein L. (1953) Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Blackwell, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wright R. D. & Ward L. M. (2008) Orienting of attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.