Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Sensorimotor Direct Realism: How We Enact Our World” by Michael Beaton. Upshot: Accepting the biological origins and limits of what we know is a foundation stone of radical constructivist (RC) research. A corollary is that RC considers realism as allowing an impossible comparison between knowledge and reality. Recent works such as that presented in the target article have a more nuanced position in relation to “reality.” Points of similarity and difference between RC and direct realism are discussed in this commentary.
Gash H. (2016) The epistemological dance: Difference, experience and representation. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 280–282. http://constructivist.info/11/2/280
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.