Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: Enactivism is a welcome development in cognitive science, but its “radical” rejection of representation poses problems for capturing phenomenality. The totality of our interactions exceeds our awareness, so circumscribing the activity that constitutes consciousness seems to require representational guidance.
Lloyd D. (2016) Not-quite-so radical enactivism. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 361–363. http://constructivist.info/11/2/361
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.