Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: It is not clear what Kirchhoff and Hutto mean by identity when they claim that there is no gap between the phenomenal and the physical. Understanding the relation between causation and diachronic constitution, I suggest that phenomenal-physical existence is better characterized as a dynamically articulated form, structure, or gestalt.
Gallagher S. (2016) Identity or dynamic structure? Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 363–364. http://constructivist.info/11/2/363
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.