Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: An exegetical worry about Kirchhoff and Hutto’s exposition of neurophenomenology is pointed out. Combining this exegetical critique with an examination of the “strict identity” in the strict identity thesis, I argue that there is more affinity between neurophenomenology and REC than they think.
Miyahara K. (2016) Missing out on the radicalism of neurophenomenology? Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 368–370. http://constructivist.info/11/2/368
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.