Mapping the Varieties of Second-Order Cybernetics
Karl H. Müller & Alexander Riegler
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Although second-order cybernetics was proposed as a new way of cybernetic investigations around 1970, its general status and its modus operandi are still far from obvious. Problem: We want to provide a new perspective on the scope and the currently available potential of second-order cybernetics within today’s science landscapes. Method: We invited a group of scholars who have produced foundational work on second-order cybernetics in recent years, and organized an open call for new approaches to second-order cybernetics. The accepted contributions are discussed and mapped. We also investigate the relations between second-order cybernetics and second-order science. Results: We present a coherent outlook on the scope of second-order cybernetics today, identify a general methodology of science (with second-order cybernetics as a special instance) and show that second-order cybernetics can be used in a large number of disciplines that go well beyond purely scientific domains. These results are based on a new epistemic mode “from within,” which can be traced back directly to von Foerster. We also arrived at the conclusion that from its early years onwards second-order cybernetics was developed in two different ways, so that second-order cybernetics and second-order science operate in different domains. Implications: Both the coherent perspective of the scope of second-order cybernetics with a new five-part agenda and the outline for a general methodology of science based on a new epistemic mode that was created within and for second-order cybernetics demonstrate the growing importance of reflexivity in science, which, so far, has not been widely recognized.
Key words: Second-order cybernetics, second-order science, observers, endo-mode, reflexive domains, scientific methodology, Heinz von Foerster, Ranulph Glanville
Citation
Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2016) Mapping the varieties of second-order cybernetics. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 443–454. http://constructivist.info/11/3/443
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Archer M. S. (2007) Making our way through the world. Human reflexivity and social mobility. University of Cambrdge Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Archer M. S. (2012) The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Atmanspacher H. & Dalenoort G. J. (eds.) (1994) Inside versus outside. Endo- and exo-concepts of observation and knowledge in physics, philosophy and cognitive science. Springer, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Beck U., Giddens A. & Lash S. (1994) Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bortz J. & Döring N. (2015) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for humanities scholars and social scientists]. Fourth edition. Springer, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bourdieu P. & Wacquant L. J. D. (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bourdieu P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clarke B. (2009) Heinz von Foerster’s demons: The emergence of second-order systems theory. In: Clarke B. & Hansen M. (eds.) Emergence and embodiment: New essays in second-order systems theory. Duke University Press, Durham: 34–61.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1959) Some remarks on changing populations. In: Stohlman F. Jr. (ed.) The kinetics of cellular proliferation. Grune and Stratton, New York: 382–407.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1960) On self-organizing systems and their environments. Yovits M. C. & Cameron S. (eds.) Self-organizing systems. Pergamon Press, London: 31–50. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 1–19
http://cepa.info/1593
Foerster H. von (1967) Computation in neural nets. Currents in Modern Biology 1: 47–93. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 21–100.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1973) On constructing a reality. Preiser F. E. (ed.) Environmental design research. Volume 2. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudberg: 35–46. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 211–227
http://cepa.info/1278
Foerster H. von (1976) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum 8(3–4): 91–96. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 261–271
http://cepa.info/1270
Foerster H. von (1984) Principles of self-organization – In a socio-managerial context. In: Ulrich H. & Probst G. J. (eds.) Self-organization and management of social systems. Springer, Berlin: 2–24
http://cepa.info/1678
Foerster H. von (1992) Ethics and second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 1(1): 9–20. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 287–304
http://cepa.info/1742
Foerster H. von (1997) Der Anfang von Himmel und Erde hat keinen Namen: Eine Selbsterschaffung in 7 Tagen. Edited by A. Müller & K. H. Müller. Döcker-Verlag, Vienna. English translation: Foerster H. von (2014).
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2014) The beginning of heaven and earth has no name: Seven days with second-order cybernetics. Fordham University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Geertz C. (1983) Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretative anthropology. Basic Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Geertz C. (2000) Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hollingsworth J. R. & Müller K. H. (2008) Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology. Socio-Economic Review 3(6): 395–426.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kline R. R. (2015) The cybernetics moment or why we call our age the information age. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lissack M. (2016) Second order science: Examining hidden presuppositions in the practice of science. Foundations of Science. First online: 18 January 2016.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lissack M. (2016) What second-order science reveals about scientific claims: Incommensurability, doubt, and a lack of explication. Foundations of Science. First online: 14 January 2016.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Löfgren L. (1979) Unfoldment of self–reference in logic and in computer science. In: Jensen F. & Mayoh B. & Moeller K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Scandinavian logic symposium. Aalborg Press, Aalborg: 205–229.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Löfgren L. (1992) Complementarity in language: Toward a general understanding. In: Carvallo M. (ed.) Nature, cognition, and system II: Complementarity and beyond. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 113–153.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Martin R. J. (2015) Second-order cybernetics, radical constructivism and the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3):169–182.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1970) Biology of cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL) Research Report BCL 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana. Reprinted in: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht: 5–58
http://cepa.info/535
Mead M. (1968) Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Foerster H. von, White J. D., Peterson L. J. & Russell J. K. (eds.) Purposive Systems. Spartan Books, New York: 1–11
http://cepa.info/2634
Müller K. H. (2007) The BCL: An unfinished revolution of an unfinished revolution. In: Müller A. & Müller K. H. (eds.) (2007) An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory | BCL, 1958–1976. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 407–466.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2015) De profundis. Glanville’s transcendental framework for second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3): 27–47
http://cepa.info/2699
Pask G. (1975) Conversation, cognition and learning. A cybernetic theory and methodology. Elsevier, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pask G. (1975) The cybernetics of human learning and performance. A guide to theory and research. Hutchinson Educational, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2015) What does the future hold for radical constructivism? In: Raskin J. D., Bridges S. K. & Kahn J. S. (eds.) Studies in meaning 5: Perturbing the status quo in constructivist psychology. Pace University Press, New York: 64–86
http://cepa.info/1285
Rössler O. E. (1992) Endophysics. Die Welt des inneren Beobachters. Merve, Berlin.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S. J. (2003) Geschichten & Diskurse. Abschied vom Konstruktivismus. Rowohlt, Reinbek. English translation: Schmidt S. J. (2007) Histories & discourses. Rewriting constructivism. Imprint Academic, Exeter.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (ed.) (1991) The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. Teachers College, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Soros G. (1994) The alchemy of finance: Reading the mind of the market. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Umpleby S. A. (2010) From complexity to reflexivity: The next step in the systems sciences. In: Trappl R. (ed.) Cybernetics and systems 2010. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna: 281–286
http://cepa.info/891
Utterback J. M. (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Völker J. & Scholl A. (2014) Do the media fail to represent reality? A constructivist and second-order critique of the research on environmental media coverage and its normative implications. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 140–149
http://constructivist.info/10/1/140
Wheeler J. A. (1994) At home in the universe. American Institute of Physics, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.