Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science
Stuart A. Umpleby
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The term “second-order cybernetics” was introduced by von Foerster in 1974 as the “cybernetics of observing systems,” both the act of observing systems and systems that observe. Since then, the term has been used by many authors in articles and books and has been the subject of many conference panels and symposia. Problem: The term is still not widely known outside the fields of cybernetics and systems science and the importance and implications of the work associated with second-order cybernetics is not yet widely discussed. I claim that the transition from (first-order) cybernetics to second-order cybernetics is a fundamental scientific revolution that is not restricted to cybernetics or systems science. Second-order cybernetics can be regarded as a scientific revolution for the general methodology of science and for many disciplines as well. Method: I first review the history of cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Then I analyze the major contents of von Foerster’s fundamental revolution in science and present it as a general model for an alternative methodology of science. Subsequently, I present an example of practicing second-order socio-cybernetics from within. I describe some consequences of doing science from within, and I suggest some new horizons for second-order cybernetics. Results: Second-order cybernetics leads to a new foundation for conducting science and offers important contributions for a new way of organizing science. It expands the conception of science so that it can more adequately deal with living systems. Implications: Second-order cybernetics extends the traditional scientific approach by bringing scientists within the domain of what is described and analyzed. It provides models of research processes for when the scientist is within the system being studied. In this way it offers a new foundation for research in the social sciences, in management science, and in other fields such as the environmental sciences or the life sciences. Keywords: Epistemology, general scientific methodology, cybernetics, social sciences, action research, Heinz von Foerster.
Key words: Epistemology, general scientific methodology, cybernetics, social sciences, action research, Heinz von Foerster
Citation
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-order cybernetics as a fundamental revolution in science. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 455–465. http://constructivist.info/11/3/455
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Alinsky S. D. (1971) Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Random House, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Argyris C. & Schön D. A. (1974) Theory in practice. Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bateson G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chandler Publishing, San Francisco.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bausch K. & Christakis A. N. (eds.) (2015) With reason and vision: Structured dialogic design. Ongoing Emergence Press, Cincinnati OH.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Becerra G. & Amozurrutia J. A. (2015) Rolando García’s “Complex Systems Theory” and its relevance to sociocybernetics. Journal of Sociocybernetics 13(1): 18–30.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Becerra G. & Castorina J. A. (2015) El condicionamiento del “marco epistémico” en distintos tipos de análisis constructivista [The epistemic framework and the different levels of constructivist analysis]. In: Ahumada J. V., Venturelli A. N. & Chibeni S. S. (eds.) Filosofía e historia de la ciencia en el Cono Sur. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba: 101–107.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boix-mansilla V. (2006) Interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical examination of expert interdisciplinary epistemologies. Issues in Integrative Studies 31(24): 1–31.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brün H. (2004) When music resists meaning: The major writings of Herbert Brün. Edited by Arun Chandra. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown CT.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Burbidge J. (ed.) (1988) Approaches that work in rural development: Emerging trends, participatory methods and local initiatives. K. G. Saur, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Burman J. T. (2007) Piaget no “remedy” for Kuhn, but the two should be read together: Comment on Tsou’s ‘Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress.’ Theory & Psychology 17(5): 721–732
http://cepa.info/2835
Cariani P. (1993) To evolve an ear: Epistemological implications of Gordon Pask’s electrochemical devices. Systems Research 10 (3): 19–33
http://cepa.info/2836
Charter N. & Loewenstein G. (2016) The under-appreciated drive for sense-making. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 126B: 137–154.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Christakis A. & Bausch K. C. (2006) Co-laboratories of democracy: How people harness their collective wisdom to create the future. Information Age Publishing, Boston MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cooperrider D. L. & Whitney D. (2005) Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Corona E. & Thomas B. (2010) A new perspective on the early history of the American Society for Cybernetics. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences. Summer 2010: 21–34.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Derman E. (2011) Models. Behaving. Badly: Why confusing illusion with reality can lead to disaster, on Wall Street and in life. Free Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fals Borda O. (1978) Über das Problem, wie man die Realität erforscht, um sie zu verändern. In: Moser H. & Ornauer H. (eds.) Internationale Aspekte der Aktionsforschung. Kösel, Munich: 78–112.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Flanagan T. R. (2014) Designing the means for governing the commons. In: Metcalf G. S. (ed.) Social systems and design. Springer, Tokyo: 147–166.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1960) On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: Yovits M. C. & Cameron S. (eds.) Self-Organizing Systems. Pergamon Press, London: 31–50. Reprinted in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 1–19
http://cepa.info/1593
Foerster H. von (1981) Formalización de ciertos aspectos de las estructuras cognitivas. In: Inhelder B., García R. & Voneche J. (eds.) Jean Piaget. Epistemología genética y equilibración. Fundamentos, Madrid: 89–105. Originally published as: Foerster H. von (1976) Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviours. ASC Cybernetics Forum 8(3–4): 91–96. Republished in: Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 261–271.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1988) Abbau und Aufbau. In: Simon F. B. (ed.) Lebende Systeme: Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der Systemischen Therapie. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg: 19–33.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2003) Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 283–286. Originally published in 1979
http://cepa.info/1707
Foerster H. von (2003) Cybernetics of epistemology. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 229–246. Originally published in 1974.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2003) Ethics and second-order cybernetics. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 287–304. Originally published in 1992
http://cepa.info/1742
Foerster H. von (2003) On constructing a reality. In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 211–228. Originally published in: Preiser F. E. (ed.) (1973) Environmental design research. Volume 2. Dowdon, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudberg: 35–46
http://cepa.info/1278
Foerster H. von (2003) What is memory that it may have hindsight and foresight as well? In: Foerster H. von, Understanding understanding. Springer, New York: 101–131. Originally published in 1969.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García R. (1987) Sociology of science and sociogenesis of knowledge. In: Inhelder B., Caprona D. & Cornu A. (eds.) Piaget today. Taylor & Francis, New York: 127–140.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García R. (1992) The structure of knowledge and the knowledge of structure. In: Beilin H. & Bufall P. (eds.) Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities. Routledge, Chicago: 21–38.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García R. (1997) La epistemología genética y la ciencia contemporánea: Homenaje a Jean Piaget en su centenario [Genetic epistemology and contemporary science: Homage to Jean Piaget and his followers]. Gedisa, Barcelona.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García R. (1999) A systemic interpretation of Piaget’s theory of knowledge. In: Scholnick E. K., Nelson C., Gerlman S. & Miller P. (eds.) Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy. LEA, Mahwah NJ: 165–184
http://cepa.info/2782
García R. (2000) El conocimiento en construcción: De las formulaciones de Jean Piaget a la teoría de sistemas complejos [Knowledge in construction: From Jean Piaget’s writings to the theory of complex systems]. Gedisa, Barcelona.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
García R. (2006) Sistemas complejos. Conceptos, método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigación interdisciplinaria [Complex systems: Concepts, methods and epistemology of interdisciplinary research]. Gedisa, Barcelona.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. & Trow M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gill T. G. (2010) Informing business: Research and education on a rugged landscape. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gill T. G. (2012) Informing on a rugged landscape: Homophily versus expertise. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 15: 49–91.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gould S. (2010) Triumph and tragedy in Mudville: A Lifelong passion for baseball. W. W. Norton, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Greenwood D. J. & Levin M. (2007) Introduction to action research. Second edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Haraway D. J. (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14: 575–599.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Haraway D. J. (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. The Free Association Books, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hawking S. & Mlodinow L. (2010) The grand design. Bantam Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Held R. & Hein A. (1963) Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behaviour. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 56(5): 872–876.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hollingsworth J. R. & Müller K. H. (2008) Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology. Socio-Economic Review 3(6): 395–426.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Inhelder B., García R. & Voneche J. (1981) Jean Piaget. Epistemología genética y equilibración. Fundamentos, Madrid. Originally published in French as: Inhelder B., García R. & Voneche J. (1977) Epistémologie génétique et équilibration [Genetic epistemology and equilibration]. Delachaux & Niestlé, Neuchatel.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kahneman D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kandel E. R. (2012) The age of insight. The quest to understand the unconscious in art, mind, and brain, from Vienna 1900 to the present. Random House, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kline R. R. (2015) The cybernetics moment or why we call our age the information age. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Knorr-Cetina K. (1989) Spielarten des Konstruktivismus: Einige Notizen und Anmerkungen [Varieties of constructivism: Some notes and comments]. Soziale Welt 40(1/2): 86–96
http://cepa.info/2776
Kuhn T. S. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kuhn T. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Second edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. (2012) Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science 4: 773–785.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lefebvre V. (2001) Algebra of conscience. Revised edition with a second part and a new foreword by Anatol Rapoport. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lissack M. & Graber A. (eds.) (2014) Modes of explanation: Affordances for action and prediction. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke UK.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lissack M. (2016) Don’t be addicted: The oft overlooked dangers of simplification. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. In press.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1990) The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown. In: Krohn W., Küppers G. & Nowotny H. (eds.) Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution. Springer, Dordrecht: 64–86
http://cepa.info/2712
Maturana H. R. (1975) The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7(3): 313–332
http://cepa.info/547
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press, New York: 27–63
http://cepa.info/549
Miles R. E. Jr. (1978) The origin and meaning of Miles’ Law. Public Administration Review 38(5): 399–403.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2015) De profundis. Ranulph Glanville’s transcendental framework for second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3): 27–47
http://cepa.info/2699
Murdoch D. (1987) Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ostrom E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Overton W. F. (1994) Contexts of meaning: The computational and the embodied mind. In: Overton W. F. & Palermo D. S. (eds.) The nature and ontogenesis of meaning. LEA, Hillsdale NJ: 1–18.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. & García R. (1982) Psicogénesis e historia de la ciencia. Siglo XXI, México. English translation: Piaget J. & García R. (1989) Psychogenesis and the history of science. Columbia University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. & García R. (1988) Hacia una lógica de significaciones. Centro editor de América Latina, Buenos Aires. Originally published in French as: Piaget J. & García R. (1987) Vers une logique des significations [Towards a logic of significations]. Murionde, Geneva.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pias C. (2003) Cybernetics: The Macy conferences 1946–1953. Diaphanes, Zurich.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini M. (1996) Inevitable illusions: How mistakes of reason rule our minds. Wiley, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reason P. & Bradbury H. (eds.) (2001) The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. Sage, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reichardt J. (ed.) (1968) Cybernetic serendipity: The computer and the arts. Praeger, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rorty R. (1991) Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers. Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rosen R. (1985) Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Saris W. E. & Gallhofer I. N. (2007) Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken NJ.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Soros G. (1987) The alchemy of finance: Reading the mind of the market. Simon and Schuster, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Soros G. (2014) Fallibility, reflexivity, and the human uncertainty principle. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(4): 309–329.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Suri R. (2008) Growth at the bottom. Delinking poverty-combat from “development.” A non-charity solution to global poverty in a short time. WISDOM RISC-Papers, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Umpleby S. A. & Thomas K. S. (1983) Applying systems theory to the conduct of systems research. In: Debons A. (ed.) Information science in action: System design. Volume 1. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague: 381–395.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Umpleby S. A. (1974) On making a scientific revolution. In: Foerster H. von (ed.) Cybernetics of cybernetics or the control of control and the communication of communication. The Biological Computer Laboratory, Urbana IL: 130–131
http://cepa.info/2410
Umpleby S. A. (1979) Computer conference on general systems theory: One year’s experience. In: Henderson M. M. & MacNaughton M. J. (eds.) Electronic communication: Technology and impacts. Westview Press, Boulder CO: 55–63.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Umpleby S. A. (1987) American and Soviet discussions of the foundations of cybernetics and general system theory. Cybernetics and Systems 18: 177–193.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vaihinger H. (1924) The philosophy of “as if”: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. Translated by C. K. Ogden. Routledge, and Kegan Paul, London. German original published in 1911.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. & Singer W. (1987) Neuronal dynamics in the visual cortico-thalamic pathway as revealed through binocular rivalry. Experimental Brain Research 66(1): 10–20.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Warfield J. N. & Cardenas A. R. (1994) A handbook of interactive management. Iowa State University Press: Ames.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Warfield J. N. (1986) The domain of science model: Evolution and design. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Society for General Systems Research. Intersystems, Salinas CA: H46-H59.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Warfield J. N. (1987) The domain of science model: Extensions and restrictions. George Mason University white paper, John N. Warfield Collection 35.14.
http://hdl.handle.net/1920/3303
Wittgenstein L. (1967) Philosophical investigations. Third edition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Yin R. K. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods. 4th edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.