Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice
Ben Sweeting
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The relationship between design and science has shifted over recent decades. One bridge between the two is cybernetics, which offers perspectives on both in terms of their practice. From around 1980 onwards, drawing on ideas from cybernetics, Glanville has suggested that rather than apply science to design, it makes more sense to understand science as a form of design activity, reversing the more usual hierarchy between the two. I return to review this argument here, in the context of recent discussions in this journal regarding second-order science (SOS). Problem: Despite numerous connections to practice, second-order cybernetics (SOC) has tended to be associated with theory. As a result, SOC is perceived as separate to the more tangible aspects of earlier cybernetics in a way that obscures both the continuity between the two and also current opportunities for developing the field. Method: I review Glanville’s understanding of design, and particularly his account of scientific research as a design-like activity, placing this within the context of the shifting relation between science and design during the development of SOC, with reference to the work of Rittel and Feyerabend. Through this, I summarise significant parallels and overlaps between SOC and the contemporary concerns of design research. Results: I suggest that we can see design research not just as a field influenced by cybernetics but as a form of SOC practice even where cybernetics is not explicitly referenced. Implications: Given this, design research offers much to cybernetics as an important example of SOC that is both outward looking and practice based. As such, it bridges the gap between SOC and the more tangible legacy of earlier cybernetics, while also suggesting connections to contemporary concerns in this journal with SOS in terms of researching research. Constructivist content: By suggesting that we see design research as an example of SOC, I develop connections between constructivism and practice.
Key words: Science, design research, second-order cybernetics, second-order science, practice, Ranulph Glanville
Citation
Sweeting B. (2016) Design research as a variety of second-order cybernetic practice. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 572–579. http://constructivist.info/11/3/572
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Alexander C. (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alexander C. (1984) The state of the art in design methods. In: Cross N. (ed.) Developments in design methodology. Wiley, Chichester: 309–316. Originally published in 1971.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Arbib M. A. (2013) (Why) should architects care about neuroscience? In: Tidwell P. (ed.) Architecture and neuroscience: A tapio wirkkala-rut bryk design reader. Tapio Wirkkala Rut Bryk Foundation, Espoo: 43–76.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ashby W. R. (1991) General systems theory as a new discipline. In: Klir G. J. (ed.) Facets of systems science. Plenum Press, New York: 249–257. Originally published in 1958.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bédard J.-F. (ed.) (1994) Cities of artificial excavation: The work of Peter Eisenman, 1978–1988. Rizzoli International, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bremaud I. (2012) Acoustical properties of wood in string instruments soundboards and tuned idiophones: Biological and cultural diversity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America 2012: 131(1): 807–818.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00808347.
Crease R. P. & Lutterbie J. (2010) Technique. In: Krastner D. & Saltz D. A. (eds.) Staging philosophy: Intersections of theater, performance, and philosophy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor: 160–179.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cross N. (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies 3(4): 221–227.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cross N. (2007) From a design science to a design discipline: Understanding designerly ways of knowing and thinking. In: Michel R. (ed.) Design research now: Essays and selected projects. Birkhäuser, Basel.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Downton P. (2004) Studies in design research: Ten epistemological pavilions. RMIT University Press, Melbourne.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fischer T. & Herr C. (2007) The designer as toolbreaker? Probing tool use in applied generative design. In: CAADRIA2004: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computer aided architectural design research in Asia, Nanjing, China 19–21 April 2007: 367–375.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Flusser V. (2011) Into the universe of technical images. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1962) Perception of form in biological and man-made systems. In: Zagorski E. J. (ed.) Transactions of the I. D. E. A. Symposion. University of Illionois, Urbana IL: 10–37
http://cepa.info/1612
Foerster H. von (2003) Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York: 283–286. Originally published in: Krippendorff K. (ed.) (1979) Communication and control. Gordon and Breach, New York: 5–8
http://cepa.info/1707
Foerster H. von (ed.) (1995) Cybernetics of cybernetics: Or, the control of control and the communication of communication. Second edition. Future Systems, Minneapolis MN. Originally published in 1974.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Frayling C. (1993) Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1(1): 1–5.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Frazer J. (1993) The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Systems Research 10(3): 43–48.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Furtado Cardoso Lopes G. M. (2008) Cedric Price’s generator and the Frazers’ systems research. Technoetic Arts 6(1): 55–72.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Furtado Cardoso Lopes G. M. (2009) Gordon Pask: Exchanges between cybernetics and architecture and the envisioning of the IE. Kybernetes 38(7/8): 1317–1331.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Furtado Cardoso Lopes G. M. (2010) Pask’s encounters: From a childhood curiosity to the envisioning of an evolving environment: Exchanges between cybernetics and architecture. Edition Echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. & Sweeting B. (eds.) (2011) Cybernetics: Art, design, mathematics – A meta-disciplinary conversation: Papers from the 2010 conference of the American Society for Cybernetics. Special double issue of Kybernetes 40(7/8).
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (1992) CAD Abusing Computing. In: Mortola E. et al. (eds.) CAAD instruction: The new teaching of an architect? 10th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Barcelona: 213–224.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (1997) A ship without a rudder. In: Glanville R. & de Zeeuw G. (eds.) Problems of excavating cybernetics and systems. BKS+, Southsea
http://cepa.info/2846
Glanville R. (2002) Second order cybernetics. In: Parra-Luna F. (ed.) Systems science and cybernetics. In: Encyclopaedia of life support systems (EOLSS). EoLSS, Oxford (Web publication
http://cepa.info/2708
Glanville R. (2004) Appropriate theory. In: Durling D., de Bono A. & Redmond J. (eds.) Futureground: Proceedings of the Design Research Society international conference 2004. Monash University, Melbourne: PAGES.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2007) Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1173–1206
http://cepa.info/2464
Glanville R. (2009) A (cybernetic) musing: Certain propositions concerning prepositions. In: The black b∞x, volume III: 39 steps. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 319–329. Originally published as: (2005) Cybernetics & Human Knowing 12(3): 87–95.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2009) A (cybernetic) musing: Design and cybernetics. In: The black b∞x. Volume III: 39 steps. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 423–425. Originally published as: (2009) Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(3–4): 175–186.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2014) Freedom and the machine. Text of inaugural professorial lecture. University College London, 10 March 2010. In: Glanville R., The black b∞x. Volume II: Living in cybernetic circles. Edition echoraum, Vienna: 61–81.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2014) Why design research? In: Glanville R., The black b∞x. Volume II: Living in cybernetic circles. Edition Echoraum, Vienna: 111–120. Originally published in: Jacues R. & Powell J. (eds.) (1981) Design, science, method: Proceedings of the 1980 Design Research Society conference. Westbury House, Guildford: 86–94.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glanville R. (2015) The sometimes uncomfortable marriages of design and research. In: Rogers P. A. & Yee J. (eds.) The Routledge companion to design research. Routledge, London: 9–22
http://cepa.info/2799
Glanville R. (ed.) (2012) Trojan horses: A rattle bag from the ‘Cybernetics: Art, design, mathematic – A meta-disciplinary conversation’ post-conference workshop. Edition echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1990) An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In: Davis R. B., Maher C. A. & Noddings N. (eds.) Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education #4. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston VA: 19–29
http://cepa.info/1415
Gooding D. (1992) Putting agency back into experiment. In: Pickering A. (ed.) Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL: 65–112.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Halprin L. (1969) The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. George Brazillier, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Herr C. & Fischer T. (2004) Using hardware cellular automata to simulate use in adaptive architecture. In: CAADRIA2004: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Seoul, Korea 28–30 April 2004: 815–828.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Herr C. & Fischer T. (2013) Systems for showing and repurposing: A second-order cybernetic reflection on some cellular automata projects. Journal of Mathematics and System Science 3(2013): 201–216
http://cepa.info/2323
Herr C. M. (2015) The big picture: Connecting design, second order cybernetics and radical constructivism. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3): 107–114
http://cepa.info/2468
Holl S., Pallasmaa J. & Pérez-Gómez A. (2006) Questions of perception: Phenomenology of architecture. William Stout, San Francisco CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hollingsworth R. & Müller, K. H. (2008) Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology. Socio-Economic Review 6(3): 395–426.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Irwin T. (2015) Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study and research. Design and Culture 7(2): 229–246.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jelić A. (2015) Designing “pre-reflective” architecture: Implications of neurophenomenology for architectural design and thinking. Ambiances – International Journal of Sensory Environment, Architecture, and Urban Space: 11 September 2015.
http://ambiances.revues.org/628
Jonas W. (2007) Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In: Michel R. (ed.) Design research now: Essays and selected projects. Birkhäuser, Basel: 187–206.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2007) Research through DESIGN through research: A cybernetic model of designing design foundations. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1362–1380.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2012) Exploring the swampy ground. In: Grand S. & Jonas W. (eds.) Mapping design research. Birkhäuser, Basel: 11–41.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2014) The strengths/limits of Systems Thinking denote the strengths/limits of Practice-Based Design Research. FORMakademisk 7(4): Article 1: 1–11.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jonas W. (2015) A cybernetic model of design research: Towards a trans-domain of knowing. In: Rogers P. A. & Yee J. (eds.) The Routledge companion to design research. Routledge, London: 23–37.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jones J. C. (1984) How my thoughts about design methods have changed during the years. In: Essays in design. Wiley, Chichester: 13–27. Originally published in 1974.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jones P. (2014) Design research methods in systemic design. In: Sevaldson B. & Jones P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Symposium of Relating Systems Thinking to Design (RSD3) Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo.
http://systemic-design.net/rsd3-proceedings/
Knorr Cetina K. (1992) The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In: Pickering A. (ed.) Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL: 113–138.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kolarevic B. (2003) Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. Taylor & Francis, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lautenschlaeger G. & Pratschke A. (2011) Don’t give up! Media art as an endless conversational process. Kybernetes 40(7/8): 1090–1101.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leach N. (2012) Parametrics explained. In: Leach N. & Yuan P. F. (ed.) Scripting the future. Tongij University Press, Shanghai. Reprinted as: Leach N. (2014) Parametrics explained. Next Generation Building 1(1): 8–15.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Littlewood J. (1964) A laboratory of fun. New Scientist 22(391): 432–433.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lloyd Thomas K., Amhoff T. & Beech N. (eds.) (2016) Industries of architecture. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lobsinger M. L. (2000) Cybernetic theory and the architecture of performance: Cedric Price’s Fun Palace. In: Goldhagen S. W. & Legault R. (eds.) Anxious modernisms: Experimentation in post-war architectural culture. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 119–139.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mallgrave H. F. (2011) The architect’s brain: Neuroscience, creativity, and architecture. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mallgrave H. F. (2013) Architecture and embodiment: The implications of the new sciences and humanities for design. Routledge, New York NY.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mathews S. (2005) The Fun Palace: Cedric Price’s experiment in architecture and technology. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 3(2): 73–91.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mathews S. (2006) The Fun Palace as virtual architecture: Cedric Price and the practices of indeterminacy. Journal of Architectural Education 59(3): 39–48.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mathews S. (2007) From agit-prop to free space: The architecture of Cedric Price. London: Black Dog.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1990) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: Krohn W., Kuppers G. & Nowotny H. (eds.) Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 12–35
http://cepa.info/607
Mead M. (1968) Cybernetics of cybernetics. In: Foerster H. von, White J. D., Peterson L. J. & Russell J. K. (eds.) Purposive systems. Spartan Books, New York: 1–11
http://cepa.info/2634
Medawar P. (1996) Is the scientific paper a fraud? In: The strange case of the spotted mice and other classic essays on science. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 33–39. Originally published in 1963.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Michel R. (2007) Design research now: Essays and selected projects. Birkhäuser, Basel.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2008) The new science of cybernetics: The evolution of living research designs. Volume I: Methodology. Edition Echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller K. H. (2011) The new science of cybernetics: The evolution of living research designs. Volume II: Theory. Edition Echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Negroponte N. (1975) Soft architecture machines. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nowotny H., Scott P. & Gibbons M. (2006) Re-thinking science: Mode 2 in societal context. In: Carayannis E. G. & Campbell D. F. J. (eds.) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport CT: 39–51.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Oxman R. (2006) Theory and design in the first digital age. International Journal of Design Studies 27: 229–265.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pallasmaa J. (2005) The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pickering A. (1993) The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 559–589.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Popper K. R. (1976) Unended quest: An intellectual autobiography. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pratschke A. (2007) Architecture as a verb: Cybernetics and design processes for the social divide. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1458–1470.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ramsgard Thomsen M. (2007) Drawing a live section: Explorations into robotic membranes. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1471–1485.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rawes P. (2007) Second-order cybernetics, architectural drawing and monadic thinking. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1486–1496.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rawes P. (ed.) (2013) Relational architectural ecologies: Architecture, nature and subjectivity. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rietveld E. (2016) Situating the embodied mind in a landscape of standing affordances for living without chairs: Materializing a philosophical worldview. Sports Medicine: 1–6.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. & Webber M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. & Webber M. (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems. In: Cross N. (ed.) Developments in design methodology. Wiley, Chichester: 135–144.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rittel H. (1972) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the “first and second generations.” Bedriftskonomen 8: 390–396.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schneidewind U. & Augenstein K. (2012) Analyzing a transition to a sustainability-oriented science system in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 3: 16–28.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1988) Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies 9(3): 181–190.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1991) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Arena, Farnham. Originally published in 1983.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scott B. (2011) Explorations in second-order cybernetics: Reflections on cybernetics, psychology and education. Edition Echoraum, Vienna.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Snow C. P. (1961) The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spiller N. (2006) Visionary architecture: Blueprints of the modern imagination. Thames and Hudson, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spiller N. (ed.) (2002) Cyber_reader: Critical writings for the digital era. Phaidon Press, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sweeting B. (2014) Architecture and undecidability: Explorations in there being no right answer – Some intersections between epistemology, ethics and designing architecture, understood in terms of second-order cybernetics and radical constructivism. PhD Thesis, UCL, London.
http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1443544
Toffler A. (1970) Future shock: A study of mass bewilderment in the face of accelerating change. Bodley Head, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Trimingham R. (2008) The role of values in design decision-making. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 13(2): 37–52.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turnbull D. (2000) Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Upitis A. (2013) Alexander’s choice: How architecture avoided computer aided design c. 1962. In: Dutta A. (ed.) A second modernism: MIT, architecture, and the “techno-social” moment. SA+P Press, Cambridge MA: 474–505.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.