Enaction as a Lived Experience: Towards a Radical Neurophenomenology
Claire Petitmengin
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The founding idea of neurophenomenology is that in order to progress in the understanding of the human mind, it is indispensable to integrate a disciplined study of human experience in cognitive neuroscience, an integration which is also presented as a methodological remedy for the “hard problem” of consciousness. Problem: Does neurophenomenology succeed in solving the hard problem? Method: I distinguish two interpretations and implementations of neurophenomenology: a light or “mild” neurophenomenology, which aims at building correlations between first-person descriptions and neural recordings, and tries to evaluate the validity of first-person descriptions through objective criteria; and a deep or radical neurophenomenology, which aims at investigating the process of co-constitution of the subjective and the objective poles, within lived experience, and tries to evaluate first-person descriptions through processual criteria. Results: While mild neurophenomenology does not solve the hard problem, radical neurophenomenology solves it by dissolving it. Exploring the early stages of phenomenal processes such as the emergence of a perception or an idea highlights: (1) a dimension of experience where the separation usually perceived between the subjective and the objective poles vanishes; (2) micro-actions that instant after instant create and support this process of co-constitution, which Varela called “enaction.” This involves on the one hand experiencing concretely the dissolution of the hard problem, and on the other hand verifying the theory of enaction in lived experience. Implications: Radical neurophenomenology is a research programme that enables us to investigate precisely the mutual unfolding of the subjective and objective poles, from its most primitive phases such as perceptual events, to its latest phases such as the co-construction of scientific objectivity and intersubjectivity.
Citation
Petitmengin C. (2017) Enaction as a lived experience: Towards a radical neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 139–147. http://constructivist.info/12/2/139
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Allen M., Smallwood J., Christensen J., Gramm D., Rasmussen B., Gaden Jensen C., Roepstorff A. & Lutz A. (2013) The balanced mind: The variability of task-unrelated thoughts predicts error-monitoring. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 743.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ataria Y. (2017) The answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything, or: Some reflections on the feasibility of the neurophenomenology research program. Journal of Consciousness Studies, Journal of Consciousness Studies 24(1–2): 7–30.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bach y Rita P. (1962) Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. Academic Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bagdasaryan J. & Le Van Quyen M. (2013) Experiencing your brain: Neurofeedback as a new bridge between neuroscience and phenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 680.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bayne T. J. (2004) Closing the gap: Some questions for neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 349–64
http://cepa.info/2260
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2015) The science of mind as it could have been: About the contingency of the (quasi-) disappearance of introspection in psychology. In: Soler L., Trizio E. & Pickering A. (eds.) Science as it could have been. The University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh: 285–316.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2017) Neurophenomenology and the microphenomenological interview. In: Velmans M. & Schneider S. (eds.) The Blackwell companion to consciousness. Second edition. Wiley & Sons, Chichester: In press.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bitbol M. (2014) La conscience a-t-elle une origine? Des neurosciences à la pleine conscience: Une nouvelle approche de l’esprit. Flammarion, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bitbol M. (2017) Neurophenomenology of surprise. In: Depraz N. & Celle A. (eds.) Surprise surprise! Surprise at the crossroads of phenomenology and linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: In press.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cardeña E., Jönsson P., Terhune D. B. & Marcusson-Clavertz D. (2013) The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex 49(2): 375–385.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Christoff K., Gordon A. M., Smallwood J., Smith R. & Schooler J. W. (2009) Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. PNAS 106(21): 8719–8724.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comte A. (1945) Cours de philosophie positive. Leçons 1 à 45. Hermann, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Desbordes G. & Negi L. T. (2013) A new era for mind studies: Training investigators in both scientific and contemplative methods of inquiry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 741.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Diaz B. A., Van Der Sluis S., Moens S., Benjamins J. S., Migliorati F., Stoffers D., Poil S. S., Hardstone R. & Van’t Ent D. (2013) The Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire reveals multiple phenotypes of resting-state cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 446.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ditchburn R. W. (1973) Eye-movements and visual perception. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Freud S. (1959) The Uncanny. In: Collected Papers. Volume 4. Translated by A. Strachey) Basic Books, New York: 368–407. German original published in 1919.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(1): 14–21.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Garrison K. A., Santoyo J. F., Davis J. H., Thornhill IV, T. A., Kerr C. E. & Brewer J. A. (2013) Effortless awareness: Using real time neurofeedback to investigate correlates of posterior cingulate cortex activity in meditators’ self-report. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 440.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gendlin E. (1992) Meaning prior to the separation of the five senses. In: Stamenov M. (ed.) Current advances in semantic theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 31–53.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Guggisberg A. G. & Mottaz A. (2013) Timing and awareness of movement decisions: Does consciousness really come too late? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 385.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hardcastle V. G. (1996) The why of consciousness: A non-issue for materialists. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 7–13.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Holton G. (1988) Thematic origins of scientific thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1970) The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental philosophy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL. German original published in 1936.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1993) Appendices aux études psychologiques pour la logique élémentaire. In: Husserl E. & Twardowski K., Sur les objets intentionnels. Vrin, Paris: 255–268. German original published in 1893.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (2001) Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Originally published in German as: Husserl E. (1966) Analysen zur passiven Synthesis, Husserliana XI. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (2012) Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge, London. German original published in 1913.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Huxley T. H. (1986) Lessons in elementary physiology. Macmillan, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ihde D. (2007) Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound. State University of New York Press. First edition published by Ohio University Press in 1976.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jaynes J. (1976) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jo H.-G., Hinterberger T., Wittmann M. & Schmidt S. (2015) Do meditators have higher awareness of their intentions to act? Cortex 65: 149–158.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jo H.-G., Wittmann M., Borghardt T. L., Hinterberger T. & Schmidt S. (2014) First-person approaches in neuroscience of consciousness: Brain dynamics correlate with the intention to act. Consciousness and Cognition 26: 105–116.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kriegel U. (2009) Subjective consciousness: A self-representational theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kuhn T. (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. Third edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lachaux J.-P. (2011) If no control, then what? Making sense of “neural noise” in human brain mapping experiments using first-person reports. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18: 162–166.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lachaux J.-P., Axmacher N., Mormann F. Halgren E. & Crone N. E. (2012) High- frequency neural activity and human cognition: Past, present and possible future of intracranial EEG research. Progress in Neurobiology 98: 279–301.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lamme V. A. F. (2006) Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 494–501.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lifshitz M., Cusumano E. P. & Raz A. (2013) Hypnosis as neurophenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 469.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Loy D. (1988) Nonduality: A study in comparative philosophy. Humanity Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lutz A. & Thompson E. (2003) Neurophenomenology integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(9–10): 31–52.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lutz A. (2002) Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: A first empirical case study. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 133–167.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mackenzie M. J., Carlson L. E., Paskevich D. M., Ekkekakis P., Wurz A. J., Wytsma K., Krenz K. A., McAuley E. & Culos-Reed S. N. (2014) Associations between attention, affect and cardiac activity in a single yoga session for female cancer survivors. Consciousness and Cognition 27: 129–146.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McCall C., Hildebrandt L. K., Bornemann B. & Singer T. (2015) Physiophenomenology in retrospect: Memory reliably reflects physiological arousal during a prior threatening experience. Consciousness and Cognition 38: 60–70.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nāgārjuna (2002) Stances du milieu par excellence de Nāgārjuna. Translated by G. Bugault. Gallimard, Paris. Originally published in Sanskrit as: Mūlamadhyamakakārikās.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Natorp P. (1912) Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Northoff G. & Heinzel A. (2006) First-person neuroscience: A new methodological approach for linking mental and neuronal states. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1: 1–10.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (1999) The intuitive experience. In: Varela F. J. & Shear J. (eds.) The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter: 43–77
http://cepa.info/2411
Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for a science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 229–269
http://cepa.info/2376
Petitmengin C. (2011) Describing the experience of describing? The blind spot of introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18(1): 44–62.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (2016) The scientist’s body at the source of meaning. In: Schoeller D. & Saller V. (eds.) Thinking thinking. Practicing radical reflection. Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg / München. 28–49.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pacoud B. & Roy J.-M. (1999) Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pacoud B. & Roy J.-M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 1–80.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Price D. D., Barrell J. J. & Rainville P. (2002) Integrating experiential–phenomenological methods and neuroscience to study neural mechanisms of pain and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 11(4): 593–608.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rainville P., Duncan G. H., Price D. D., Carrier B. & Bushnell M. C. (1997) Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277(5328): 968–971.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Remillieux A. (2014) Les coulisses d’une invention: Une description expérientielle du processus d’invention technique. Intellectica 61: 273–310.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schmidt S., Jo H.-G., Wittmann M. & Hinterberger T. (2016) “Catching the waves”: Slow cortical potentials as moderator of voluntary action. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 68: 639–650.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steinam R. M. & Levinson J. Z. (1990) The role of eye movement in detection of contrast and spatial detail. In: Kowler E. (ed.) Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stern D. (2010) Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Strle T. (2013) Why should we study experience more systematically: Neurophenomenology and modern cognitive science. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 11(4): 376–390
http://cepa.info/1067
Stuart S. A. J. (2013) The union of two nervous systems: Neurophenomenology, enkinaesthesia, and the Alexander technique. Constructivist Foundation 8: 314–323
http://cepa.info/908
Thompson E. & Zahavi D. (2007) Phenomenology. In: Zelazo P. D., Moscovitch M. & Thompson E. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 67–87.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 381–398
http://cepa.info/1137
Thompson E. (2006) Neurophenomenology and contemplative experience. In: Clayton P. & Simpson Z. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of religion and science. Oxford University Press, New York: 226–235
http://cepa.info/2356
Thompson E., Lutz A. & Cosmelli D. (2005) Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In: Brook A. & Akins K. (eds.) Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement. Cambridge University Press, New York: 40–97
http://cepa.info/2374
Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche (1999) As it is. Vol I. Rangjung Yeshe Publications, Hongkong.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche (2000) As it is. Vol II. Rangjung Yeshe Publications, Hongkong.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Uexküll J. von (1909) Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Julius Springer, Berlin. English translation: (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89(4): 319–391
http://cepa.info/2404
Van den Bussche E., Vermeiren A., Desender K., Gevers W., Hughes G., Verguts T. & Reynvoet B. (2013) Disentangling conscious and unconscious processing: A subjective trial-based assessment approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 769.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1999) The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 266–314
http://cepa.info/2081
Vermersch P. (2016) L’entretien d’explicitation. ESF, Paris. Originally published in 1994. Werner H. (1934) L’unité des sens. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 31: 190–205.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Werner H. (1956) Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 52: 347–353.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zanesco A. P., King B., MacLean K. & Saron C. D. (2013) Executive control and felt concentrative engagement following intensive meditation training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 566.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.