Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Enaction as a Lived Experience: Towards a Radical Neurophenomenology” by Claire Petitmengin. Upshot: Why has the neurophenomenological approach not been adopted as a common and even obligatory tool in the study of consciousness? I suggest that the problem with the neurophenomenological approach is its effectiveness on the one hand and its almost impossible demands from the scientist on the other: One cannot accept the neurophenomenological approach without rejecting not only the paradigm of cognitive science, but the scientific paradigm as a whole.
Ataria Y. (2017) Varela as the uncanny. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 153–154. http://constructivist.info/12/2/153
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.