Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Enaction as a Lived Experience: Towards a Radical Neurophenomenology” by Claire Petitmengin. Upshot: Mild” neurophenomenology does not solve the “hard problem” of consciousness; in a way it actually aggravates it. “Radical” neurophenomenology “dissolves” the hard problem. However, I suggest that it may be premature to give up on actually solving the hard problem; and indicate several lines of research that are still open.
Stewart J. (2017) What is it like to be conscious? Towards solving the hard problem. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 155–156. http://constructivist.info/12/2/155
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.