Download the full text in
PDF (89 kB)
Upshot: We respond to three main challenges that the commentaries have raised. Firstly, we clarify our misunderstood intention of introducing a newcomer to the neurophenomenological family. Rather, we situate our approach under the broader umbrella of phenomenology. Secondly, we argue that from our empirical position it is questionable that the strategy we pursued in the target article left the black box of consciousness completely closed. Thirdly, we argue that the subjective fluctuations that may appear as outcomes in an experimental paradigm are not to be considered with a resigned attitude but as valuable information to work with. We conclude our response by agreeing with the concerns of two of the commentators about extending the perspectives and plurality of the methods to investigate the explanatory gap problem.
Baquedano C. & Fabar C. (2017) Author’s response: Multiple views in search of unifying models. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 186–189. http://constructivist.info/12/2/186
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.