“Dialectical Dance” and “Dialectical Star”: What Exactly Are We Talking About?
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Add Comment
Open peer commentary on the article “Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being” by Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol. Upshot: In this commentary, though I agree with most of Vörös and Bitbol’s statements about Varela’s work, I ask the authors both for a clarification regarding their concept of dialectic and whether their understanding of this concept should lead us to accept their view according to which no further attempt to “find a theoretical fix […] to solve the mind-body problem” is needed (§26.
Zaslawski N. (2017) “dialectical dance” and “dialectical star”: What exactly are we talking about? Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 44–46. http://constructivist.info/13/1/044
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Bitbol M. & Antonova E. (2016)
On the too often overlooked radicality of neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations. 11(2): 354–356. ttp://constructivist.info/11/2/354 http://constructivist.info///000
Labarrière P.-J. (1979)
Introduction à une lecture de la phénoménologie de l’esprit. Aubier, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2004)
Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 3(4): 381–398. http://cepa.info/1137
Varela F. J. (1997)
The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: Searching generative mutual constraints. Alter, Revue de Phénoménologie 5: 355–385. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (2003)
Phenomenology and metaphysics. In: Zahavi D., Heinämaa S. & Ruin H. (eds.) Metaphysics, facticity, interpretation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 3–22. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (2013)
Naturalized phenomenology: A desideratum or a category mistake? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 72: 23–42. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.