You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board & Policies
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Call for Book Reviewers
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 16
Number 1
Volume 15
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 14
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 13 · Number 1 · Pages 46–48
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
Enacting Science: Extending Enaction Beyond the Content of a Theory

Ema Demšar

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Share on

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being” by Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol. Upshot: In general agreement with the target article, I relate Vörös and Bitbol’s elucidation of Varelian philosophical roots of enaction to a discussion of enaction put forward by Varela’s co-authors Rosch and Thompson in their introductions to the revised edition of The Embodied Mind. I align Vörös and Bitbol’s multi-layered understanding of enaction to Rosch’s distinction between its “phase 1” and “phase 2” accounts. I consider the implications of the relationship between the pseudo-subject and the meta-subject of the enactive account of mind for the general enactivist conception of science and scientific knowledge.

Citation

Demšar E. (2017) Enacting science: Extending enaction beyond the content of a theory. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 46–48. http://constructivist.info/13/1/046

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Kordeš U. (2016) Going beyond theory: Constructivism and empirical phenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 375–385. http://constructivist.info/11/2/375
Rosch E. (2016) Introduction to the revised edition. In: Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E., The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: xxxv–lv. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stewart J. (2001) Radical constructivism in biology and cognitive science. Foundations of Science 6(1–3): 99–124. http://cepa.info/3634
Thompson E. (2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2016) Introduction to the revised edition. In: Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E., The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: xvii–xxxiii. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (2016) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.