Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being” by Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol. Upshot: I consider the lack of clear guidelines for groundless non-dualist research proposed by Vörös and Bitbol’s interpretation of Varela’s programme. I attempt to clarify a mode of being that this kind of research calls for, and propose that understanding such a research-oriented existential attitude might replace the need for a detailed research “technique.” I reflect upon the ethical implications of research-oriented being.
Kordeš U. (2017) The elusive blueprint for building bridges. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 48–50. http://constructivist.info/13/1/048
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.