Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being” by Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol. Upshot: Setting up a dialectic between knowing and being poses an uncomfortable challenge to our usual way of doing science. As a modest contribution to the new collective culture we need, this commentary shares a few Zen koans, and three Taoist stories.
Citation
Stewart J. (2017) Saying what cannot be said. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 50–52. http://constructivist.info/13/1/050
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Jullien F. (2007) Vital nourishment: Departing from happiness. Zone Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Menary R. (2010) Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 459–463. http://cepa.info/2284
Needham J. (1969) Science and civilization in China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stewart J., Gapenne O. & Di Paolo E. (eds.) (2010) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.