Høffding S. (2017) The Perils of “Open Science”: How Radical and How Many?. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 72–73

Volume 13 · Number 1 · Pages 72–73

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

The Perils of “Open Science”: How Radical and How Many?

Simon Høffding

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Varela’s Radical Proposal: How to Embody and Open Up Cognitive Science” by Kristian Moltke Martiny. Upshot: I ask exactly how “open” we should be in “opening up cognitive science” and how many scientists should embrace the radical openness Martiny advocates. I suggest that the most fruitful realization of Martiny’s vision would consist in the creation of research groups with a balance between scholars of singular disciplines and transdisciplinary cognitive scientists.

Citation

Høffding S. (2017) The perils of “open science”: How radical and how many? Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 72–73. http://constructivist.info/13/1/072

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Høffding S. & Martiny K. (2016) Framing a phenomenological interview: What, why and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(4): 539–564. http://cepa.info/4346

Petitmengin C. & Bitbol M. (2009) Listening from within. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(10–12): 363–404. http://cepa.info/2373

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.