Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Varela’s Radical Proposal: How to Embody and Open Up Cognitive Science” by Kristian Moltke Martiny. Upshot: I ask exactly how “open” we should be in “opening up cognitive science” and how many scientists should embrace the radical openness Martiny advocates. I suggest that the most fruitful realization of Martiny’s vision would consist in the creation of research groups with a balance between scholars of singular disciplines and transdisciplinary cognitive scientists.
Høffding S. (2017) The perils of “open science”: How radical and how many? Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 72–73. http://constructivist.info/13/1/072
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.