The Reflective Science of Ethnography and Its Role in Pragmatic Design
William J. Clancey
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Varela’s Radical Proposal: How to Embody and Open Up Cognitive Science” by Kristian Moltke Martiny. Upshot: Analyses of the epistemological premises of modern ethnography suggest that “opening up” cognitive science is problematic, caught between a theoretically impossible “translation” of another world view or culture and reverting to an autobiography. Rather, an ethnography might be viewed as a “poetic” expression of interpersonal experiences, whose writing is a new experience contributing to ongoing conversations with ethical value. In particular, one can adopt an instrumental perspective in which an ethnography is a tool for engineering design; thus the “opening” is manifest as applied science within a design collaboration.
Citation
Clancey W. J. (2017) The reflective science of ethnography and its role in pragmatic design. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 73–76. http://constructivist.info/13/1/073
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Bamberger J. & Schön D. A. (1983) Learning as reflective conversation with materials: Notes from work in progress. Art Education 36: 68–73.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clancey W. J., Lowry M., Nado R. & Sierhuis M. (2011) Software productivity of field experiments using the mobile agents open architecture with workflow interoperability. Proceedings of IEEE Fourth International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology, IEEE, Palo Alto CA: 85–92.
http://billclancey.name/SMCIT2011WClancey.pdf.
Clancey W. J., Sierhuis M., Seah C., Buckley C., Reynolds F., Hall T. & Scott M. (2008) Multi-agent simulation to implementation: A practical engineering methodology for designing space flight operations. In: Artikis A., O’Hare G., Stathis K. & Vouros G. (eds.) Engineering societies in the agents’ world VIII. Springer, Berlin: 108–123.
http://billclancey.name/ESAW07OCAMSClancey.pdf
Dourish P. & Button G. (1998) On “Technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human–Computer Interaction 13: 395–432.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kendall M. B. (1987) Review of The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue, and rhetoric in the post-modern world, by Stephen A. Tyler. Anthropological Linguistics 29(3): 322–325.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rosch E. (2016) Introduction to the revised edition. In: Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (eds.) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: xxxv–lvi.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schön D. A. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spradley J. P. (1980) Participant observation. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth TX.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Squyres S. W., Knoll A. H., Arvidson R. E., Ashley J. W., Bell J. F., Calvin W. M., Christensen P. R., Clark B. C., Cohen B. A., De Souza P. A. et al. (2009) Exploration of Victoria crater by the Mars rover Opportunity. Science 324: 1058–1061.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson E. (2016) Introduction to the revised edition. In: Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (eds.) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: xvii–xxiii.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tyler S. (1978) The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. Academic Press, New York NY.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tyler S. (1987) The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue, and rhetoric in the post-modern world. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vertesi J. (2008) “Seeing Like a Rover”: Embodied experience on the Mars Exploration Rover mission. CHI ’08 Proceedings. ACM, Florence: 2523–2532.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
