Author’s Response: Degrees of Openness, Embodiment, Circularity, and Invariance
Kristian Moltke Martiny
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Add Comment
Upshot: I clarify Varela’s radical proposal by discussing different degrees of “openness,” “embodiment,” “circularity” and “invariance.” In doing so, the aim is to further describe and exemplify how his proposal is indeed radical.
Martiny K. M. (2017) Author’s response: Degrees of openness, embodiment, circularity, and invariance. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 83–90. http://constructivist.info/13/1/083
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Alsmith A. J. T. & de Vignemont F. (2012)
Embodying the mind and representing the body. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3(1): 1–13. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parnas J., Møller P., Kircher T., Thalbitzer J., Jansson L., Handest P. & Zahavi D. (2005)
EASE: Examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology 38(5): 236–258. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ravn S. & Høffding S. (2017)
The promise of “sporting bodies” in phenomenological thinking – how exceptional cases of practice can contribute to develop foundational phenomenological concepts. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 9(1): 56–68. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.